Stop and Search

This essay shall explore various issues in relation to police stop and search such as racism and discrimination directed from the police force and the pros and cons of the police powers of stop and search. The Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 (PACE) was introduced in order to balance the competing demands of bringing offenders to justice whilst preserving and maintaining the rights and liberties of suspects. In section (a) of this question, paying particular attention to the police powers of stop and search, this essay shall discuss and evaluate whether the balance of bringing offenders to justice whilst preserving the rights and liberties of suspects has been achieved in practice. In the second part of this question, section (b), my view will be given on whether the various steps taken by the government since 1999 to increase public confidence in stop and search procedures will remedy any perceived problems in this regard.

Section (a)

The Act (PACE) was the product of a Royal Commission set up following an earlier miscarriage of justice. This was in relation to the murder of a man in 1977 which resulted in three boys aged 14, 15 and 18, one of whom was educationally subnormal, being arrested, interrogated and as a result of their confessions charged with murder. However, three years later all three were released after a report into the case (Fisher Report) established that they had nothing to do with the murder.

Much concern was brought about as a result of this, this led to the set up of the Royal Commission on Criminal Procedure (RCCP). It stated in its report of 1989 that a balance needed to be reached between “the interests of the community in bringing offenders to justice and the rights and liberties of persons suspected or accused of crime.”

The purpose of PACE is to create a balance, however it has failed in doing so in some instances. For example, under the Police Reform Act 2002, s.50 a uniformed police officer can require a person who has behaved in an anti-social manner to give their name and address. Failure to comply is an offence and may form the basis for an arrest under s. 25 of PACE. This is a significant extension of police powers, which could be abused to harass young people. Police officers, aware of the power they have, are therefore able to gain the name of address of any person they wish legally. It is highly likely that this will be abused as they have to power to do so. Whilst this is a moderate form of abuse and cannot be compared to more serious police offences i.e. racism, it is still likely to cause offence.

Police stop and search is controversial in that people often believe the police single out and target particular groups of people via stereotyping. Code A of PACE s. 1.4 states that, the primary purpose of stop and search powers is to enable officers to allay or confirm suspicions about individuals without exercising their power of arrest. S 1.1 basically explains how stop and search should be used and how those stopped should be treated. It states that discrimination of any kind, such as age or racial background is unacceptable. S 3.1 is significant as it lays down the fundamental rule that police officers must abide by when stopping and searching, that is that searches require reasonable grounds for suspicion.

Join now!

People of African/Caribbean decent (black) are often seen in the media and newspapers conflicting with the police force in regards to stop and search methods. Black people were almost seven times more likely than white people to be stopped and searched by police last year, according to official figures. Ministry of Justice data shows the gap was even wider than in 2005, when black people were six times more likely to be stopped than white people. These statistics speak for themselves, they illustrate that black people are targeted more so than other races by the police, whether this means the police ...

This is a preview of the whole essay