• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. 9
  10. 10
  11. 11
  12. 12
  13. 13
  14. 14
  15. 15
  16. 16
  17. 17
  18. 18
  19. 19
  20. 20
  21. 21
  22. 22
  23. 23
  24. 24

the advantages and disadvantages of the United Kingdom Law Commission’s proposal that the law governing homicide in England and Wales be reformed to codify homicide offences.

Extracts from this document...


1. Woollin [1999] 1 AC 82 2. Adomako [1995] 1AC 171 3. Smith (Morgan) [2001] 1 AC 146 4. Wilmot (No 2) [1985] 2 Qd R 413 5. DPP v Beard [1920] AC 479 6. Boughey (1986) 161 CLR 10 7. Kai-Whitewind [2005] EWCA Crim 1092, [2005] 2 Cr App R 31 8. Cawthorne [1996] 2 Cr App Rep (S) 445 9. Z [2005] UKHL 22, [2005] 2 AC 467 10. Howe [1987] AC 417 11. Gotts [1992] 2 AC 412. 12. Z [2005] UKHL 22, [2005] 2 AC 467 13. Dixon v US (2005) 413F 3rd 520 1. Law Commission Act 1965 2. Human Rights Act 1998 3. Criminal Justice Act 2003 4. Infanticide Act 1938 5. Homicide Act 1957 6. European Convention on Human Rights 1.0 Introduction: The Law Commission The Law Commission was set up by section 1 of the Law Commission Act 1965 for the purpose of promoting the reform of the law. The Law Commission reviews the various elements of murder, including the defenses and partial defenses to it, and the relationship between the law of murder and the law relating to homicide (in particular manslaughter) in England and Wales. The review will make recommendations that take account of the continuing existence of the mandatory life sentence for murder and provide coherent and clear offences which protect individuals and society. It is also to ensure that those convicted to be appropriately punished. Recommendations that are made should be fair and non-discriminatory in accordance with the European Convention of Human Rights and the Human Rights Act 1998. The process of review used is open, inclusive and evidence-based which involves a review structure that will look to include key stakeholders and consultation with the public, criminal justice practitioners, academics, those who work with victims' families, parliamentarians and faith groups. It also involves looking at evidence from research and from the experiences of other countries in reforming their law. ...read more.


Consequently, the scope of the defence has become unclear. There appears to be little prospect of the courts resolving this disagreement. (B) Diminished responsibility The introduction of the partial defence of diminished responsibility in 1957 was a welcome reform. However, medical science has moved on considerably since then and the definition of diminished responsibility is now badly out of date. It has not been drafted with the needs and practices of medical experts in mind. Lord Justice Buxton describes the wording of the Act as "disastrous" and "beyond redemption".10 (C) Killing in pursuant of suicide pact Section 4 of the Homicide Act 1957 makes the survivor of a suicide pact who took part in the killing of another person in the pact guilty of manslaughter and not murder. This provision was meant to allow the jury to take pity on those desperate enough to seek to take their own lives along with that of another person or persons. (D) Infanticide The main problem is on the procedure for ensuring that evidence of a mother's mental disturbance at the time of the killing is heard at trial. A mother may be 'in denial' about having killed her infant. She may, therefore, be unwilling to submit to a psychiatric examination if the point of this examination seems to her to be to find out why she did it. In such circumstances, she is unlikely to have another defence and is, therefore, likely to be convicted of murder. This is not in the public interest.11 Apparently, this is not an easy problem to solve in order to do justices in such cases. 4.2 Recommendations on partial defences The Law Commission proposed that the operation of the partial defences should be confined to first degree murder only. There should be no partial defences to second degree murder or manslaughter. Partial defences with a successful plea shall have the effect of reducing first degree murder to second degree murder. ...read more.


Offences and defences specific to murder must take their place within a readily comprehensible and fair legal structure. This structure must be set out with clarity, in a way that will promote certainty and in a way that non-lawyers can understand and accept. All in all, it should be noted that codifying homicide offences should be done to certain extent only - retain current laws that are advantageous, and repeal disadvantageous current laws with a more efficacious new laws. 1 On murder see Woollin [1999] 1 AC 82 and on manslaughter see Adomako [1995] 1 AC 171 and Smith (Morgan) [2001] 1 AC 146. 2 Recommendations for manslaughter build upon previous Law Commission recommendations and Home Office proposals. 3 See "The Structure of Criminal Homicide" [2006] Criminal Law Review 471, 474. 4 Wilmot (No 2) [1985] 2 Qd R 413. 5 DPP v Beard [1920] AC 479. 6 Boughey (1986) 161 CLR 10. 7 Victor Tadros, "The Homicide Ladder" (2006) 69 Modern Law Review 601, 605. 8 J Pradel, Droit P_nal G_n_ral, (14th ed 2002) _ 502. 9 Infanticide Act 1938 10 Partial Defences to Murder (2004) Law Com No 290, para 5.43 n 40. 11 Kai-Whitewind [2005] EWCA Crim 1092, [2005] 2 Cr App R 31. 12 Jonathan Rogers, "The Law Commission's Proposed Restructuring of the Law of Homicide" [2006] Journal of Criminal Law 223. 13 See Cawthorne [1996] 2 Cr App Rep (S) 445. 14 Catherine Elliott, French Criminal Law (1991) p 49. 15 Howe [1987] AC 417. 16 Gotts [1992] 2 AC 412. 17 Z [2005] UKHL 22, [2005] 2 AC 467 at [18] by Lord Bingham. 18 Dixon v US (2005) 413F 3rd 520. 19 Jean Pradel, Manuel de proc�dure p�nale, (10th ed, 2000), �380 20 If the defendant assists or encourages the victim to commit suicide, the defendant commits the offence of aiding, abetting, counselling or procuring suicide contrary to the Suicide Act 1961, s 2. The offence is punishable by a maximum term of imprisonment of 14 years. 21 Criminal Justice Act 2003, s 269 and sch 21. 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree Criminal law section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree Criminal law essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Criminal Law - Problem Question - Homicide

    4 star(s)

    In order to establish factual causation, the 'but for' test is applied (White2). Since Brian had not died but for Alan's act of shooting at him, Alan has factually caused Brian's death. The next aspect which needs to be examined is legal causation.

  2. Marked by a teacher

    Analysis of the law relating to the offence of Murder and relevant offences of ...

    4 star(s)

    Sometimes too trivial acts can result in liability for murder if this principle is applied. The correct test would seem to be that substantial cause is anything, which is more than merely insignificant and does contribute to the death of the victim.

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Attempt to establish the relative advantages of both custodial and non-custodial sentencing in relation ...

    4 star(s)

    In this instance, the need is for the aforementioned more punitive sentencing that results in incapacitation. Durkeim argues that 'punishment is an index of society's moral codes' plus a demonstration of the force of state power and control which support's the 'norms of life,' for when they are weakened by

  2. Marked by a teacher

    Personalism-impact on victims and how Restorative justice conference can balance the interest of victims ...

    4 star(s)

    for both parties to join together to express themselves freely for a more direct communications.

  1. Sexual Offences Act 2003 - The Problem of Consent and Intoxication.

    added that whether this occurs or not is something that the jury has to decide upon, and the judge has to offer them guidance in this respect. The term 'capacity' itself has not been defined by the judges R v Bree.

  2. In order to advise Aidan on his criminal liability, it is necessary to look ...

    Depending on the exact facts, it may be that although switching off the life support machine was the immediate cause of Derek's death, this may still not have broken the chain of causation as the original wound made a significant contribution to Derek's death.16 If the prosecution can satisfy that

  1. Compare the defence of provocation to the new defence of Loss of control

    will serve to defeat the purpose for which Parliament had enacted the Coroners and Justice Act 2009. It is expected by this legislation that she will have to conduct herself as a normal female who is envisaging abnormal circumstances; reacting as an expert in predicting outcomes; and adopting the required preventive measures.

  2. After Woollin, the law of Intention remains unclear, but nonetheless works in a satisfactory ...

    55 [6] [1999] AC 82 [7] [1947] KB 997 [8] [2000] 4 All ER 961 [9] [2003] 2 Cr App R 30 [10] Ashworth, Andrew.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work