• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

This essay will firstly address the similarities and differences between marriage and civil partnerships. It will then address the various commentators, who have argued for the legitimacy and fairness of the distinction and then highlight invaluable oppos

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

This essay will firstly address the similarities and differences between marriage and civil partnerships. It will then address the various commentators, who have argued for the legitimacy and fairness of the distinction and then highlight invaluable opposing arguments against these justifications. The nature of the distinction between marriage and civil partnerships is based upon legislation. The Civil Partnership Act (CPA) is nearly identical to the Matrimonial Causes Act (MCA) despite a few missing statutory provisions. Firstly both Acts allow couples to create permanent legally recognised relationships. However the institution of marriage is solely open to opposite-sex couples1 while civil partnerships are solely open to same-sex couples2. Civil partnerships cannot be dissolved on the same grounds as marriages; where a marriage can be dissolved based upon adultery3 this provision is not available to civil partners, alternatively a civil partnership can be dissolved based upon inappropriate behaviour.4 Similarly 'non consummation' as a ground for dissolution is not available to civil partners under the CPA 2004 as it is for married couples under the MCA 1973. There basically is no mention of sex5 throughout the entire CPA 2004. Despite the above differences civil partnerships are practically identical to marriage. ...read more.

Middle

Commentators of the Christian Institute add to this concept by arguing that the Governments enactment of the CPA 2004 will enforce a moral change within society and undoubtedly change people's attitudes towards same-sex marriage in the UK.22 However Beresford et al argues that other countries such as Canada, 'no longer require marriage to fulfil a unique status in order to fulfil the interests of society.'23This outlines the irrelevance of the Governments need to gradually allow same-sex couples to marry. What invalidates these propositions for the legitimacy of the distinction is the allowance of same-sex marriage by other countries such as the Netherlands, Canada, Belgium and Spain24. Beresford et al assert that the inequality of same-sex couples as opposed to opposite sex couples lies within the enactment of the CPA 2004 itself; Beresford et al outline that as countries such as Canada have allowed same-sex marriage, the UK's denial of their entry represents an inequality.25 They also state that the existence of the CPA 2004 is a form of '...sexual apartheid...' rendering same-sex couples as "second best."26 Beresford et al highlight pressure groups such as Outrage who argued that the separate statute, 'entrenches inequality' and is discriminatory to same-sex couples. ...read more.

Conclusion

& D. 130 17 [2003] UKHL 21 at 46 18 [2006] EWCH 2022 (Fam) 118 19Bankst (n 14) 12 20 Katie Rainscourt, 'The limitations of the Civil Partnership Act 2004: an analysis of cross-border recognition of same sex marriage', (2006) 25, C.J.Q. 150. 2 21 Lord Falconer of Thoroton, 'Church, State and Civil partners' (2007) Ecc. L.J page 2 22 Response of The Christian Institute to "Civil Partnership - A framework for the legal recognition of same-sex couples"Page 8 23 Beresford, Falkus (n 12) 11 24 Beresford, Falkus (n12) 6 25 Beresford, Falkus (n12) 6 26 Beresford, Falkus (n12) 2 27Beresford, Falkus (n12) 6 28 Wilkinson (n18) 122 29 Wilkinson (n 18) 120 30 Humphreys (n 9)18 31 (A-G), 2003 CanLII 26403 (ON C.A.) 32Hyde (n 16) 33 [1970] 2 WLR 1306 34 (n31) 36 citing, EGALE Canada Inc. v. Canada (Attorney General), [2003] B.C.J. No. 994 35 Bellinger (n 17) 36 Rainscourt (n 20) 3 37Kate Standley, Family law (7th edn Palgrave Macmillan, 2010) 40 38(App no 28957/95) (2002) 35 EHRR 18 39 Wade K. Wright, 'The Tide in Favour of Equality: Same-Sex Marriage in Canada and England and Wales', (2006) 20, IJLP&F, 249. 269 40Standley (n37) 269 41Standley (n37) 268 ?? ?? ?? ?? 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree Family Law section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree Family Law essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    The distinctions between void and voidable marriages serve no purpose in modern family law ...

    4 star(s)

    The grounds for determining a voidable marriage can be found in section 12 of the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973. The voidable marriage was ideally referring to defects present at the time of the marriage, but that do not generate the marriage to be completely non-existent (void).

  2. The present law governing cohabiting couples has been widely criticized; so much so that ...

    A study conducted in Australia, where whose living together for two years or more are treated in the same was as married couples, suggested that reform had no effect on marriage rates20. The state has however traditionally favored marriage and sought to encourage people to marry, most explicitly by providing

  1. Are cohabiting couples treated as if they were married? Critically review recent proposals to ...

    This was due to the fact that cohabitation is growing and the laws overseeing it are "inadequate and give rise to unwelcome consequences", added to this the issues discussed in the report are issues that are on the rise and will not go away.

  2. Discuss and explain: a) How same-sex relationships have come to be increasingly recognised under ...

    invited by the 'reasonable implications that can be drawn from the practical provision that is in fact made'6. There are several examples of rights given to same-sex couples under the legislation that coincide with marital rights. One of the most major of these is the extension of access to life insurance payouts.

  1. Changes in Patterns of Marriages and Divorce may Reflect Changing Views of the Place ...

    Mother is only a container to carry the child. Children born from same mother but different fathers can have sexual relationship. There is another example of Tahiti where women can give her children often to her parents and in Ashanti of West Africa children are property of the wife's family.

  2. Family law.

    1960 represented a year where marriage was upheld and respected as an institution.23 Compared to contemporary society, current attitudes reveal a marked reduction in the significance of marriage. In 1991, it was predicted that 26% of 16 year olds would remain unmarried by age 50.24 The importance of this statistic

  1. Cohabitation - the need for legal reform

    https://eric.exeter.ac.uk/repository/bitstream/handle/10036/23612/barlowcohab.pdf?sequence=1 http://www.christiantoday.co.uk/article/church.of.england.faces.opposition.after.approving.cohabitation.rights/7979.htm http://www.familylawweek.co.uk/site.aspx?i=ed743 http://www.law.ox.ac.uk/published/OSCOLA_4th_edn.pdf http://www.journalonline.co.uk/Magazine/57-8/1011519.aspx#.UIh0fMWzjpg http://www.zenithchambers.co.uk/cms/document/Cohabitation_and_Trusts_of_Land_Update___ED.pdf http://lawcommission.justice.gov.uk/docs/20110906_Statement_on_Govt_response.pdf http://www.findlaw.co.uk/law/family/marriage_and_civil_partnerships/500265.html http://lawcommission.justice.gov.uk/docs/Cohabitation_FamLaw_082006.pdf ________________ [1] Gilmore, S and Glennon, L, Hayes and Williams? Family Law, (3rd ed.

  2. Problem Question, Divorce& FInancial Provision

    But it is merely a delay method.[41] Raj unlikely to have a defence under s5 or s10, but it can be a bar to divorce if he can prove that marriage isn?t irretrievable breakdown s1(4)[42]. 1. Financial Provision Courts have a wide discretion in deciding financial provision (Wagstaff v Wagstaff [1992][43]).

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work