• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

What is the doctrine of precedent

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

What is the doctrine of precedent? The doctrine of precedent is a form of reasoning and decision-making formed by case law. If a higher court has made a significant legal point in one case, it would be considered as binding in later courts. In order to understand this doctrine more clearly, it would be necessary to examine the hierarchy of the English Courts. The House of Lords holds the highest position, any decision made by them, would be binding to lower courts which filter down to the Court of Appeal, to the Crown Courts and County Courts. This is otherwise recognised as the doctrine of stare decisis, which means standing by what has been decided. This doctrine is a fundamental principle of English Law. The use of precedent is vital to the decision making process of the courts. ...read more.

Middle

This is evident in the earlier given example of Pickstone v. Freemans over "equal pay" and also in the case of Finnegan v, Clowney Youth Training Programme Ltd [1990] 2 All ER 546 on the retirement age for women under the Sex Discrimination Act 1976. Further to the point of the European Court of Justice, all English courts are required to be consistent with the jurisdiction laid down from U.K.'s membership to the E.U. particularly in relation to the Human Rights Act 1998. A persuasive precedent is different to a binding precedent in that the lower courts are unable to bind the higher courts to their decision, but can only be persuasive. As in the Mandla v. Dowell Lee case, we can identify how the House of Lords decision was swayed by the decision made in the Court of Appeal level in Australia. ...read more.

Conclusion

However, in attempt to overturn this principle, Lord Denning M.R. tried to make a House of Lords decision per incuriam. A previous court ruling can be labelled as per incuriam, i.e. the decision oversaw a number of significant material facts before submitting a legal rule. This attempt was made and condemned later in the House of Lords in Broome v. Cassell [1972] 2 Qb 354. Lord Denning M.R. tried to ignore the ratio in Rookes v Barnard [1964] AC 1129 with the reasoning that there was a significant oversight made by the Law Lords. When this case reached the House of Lords, Lord Hailsham stated, "In the hierarchical system of courts which exists in this country, it is necessary for each lower tier, including the Court of Appeal, to accept loyally the decisions of the higher tiers". This affirms the doctrine of precedent that lower courts cannot overturn the precedent set out in higher courts. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree English Legal System section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree English Legal System essays

  1. Law Making - Judicial Precedent.

    The speech might suggest 25-30 new statutes. In addition parliament introduces new statutes which are not mentioned in the speech. It will be highly unlikely that new statutes would exceed 100 per year. By comparison delegated legislation exceeds 2,000 per year.

  2. 'The scope of the flexibility of the doctrine of binding precedent has two sources; ...

    R [1992] 1 AC 599. In the words of Lord Reid on a request for a departure from a binding precedent (Jones v. The Secretary of State for Social Services [1972] 2 WLR 210) "My understanding of the position when this resolution was adopted was and is that there was

  1. The doctrine of Precedent.

    c) The Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) will normally follow its own past decisions, but has flexibility to depart from a decision where the liberty of a person is involved (R v Taylor (1950)). 4. a) Divisional courts must follow House of Lords and Court of Appeal decisions.

  2. Discuss the operation of the doctrine of precedent in the Australian courts

    Hence the doctrine of precedent stated that if a man by habits or drunkenness had entirely destroyed his capacity as a man of understanding, any instrument executed by him was invalid. Such a decision of the court posed a limit to future cases in which a party was at a special disadvantage while making contracts.

  1. The ultra vires doctrine

    was not in that respect a public authority by virtue of s.6 (5). Lord Nicholls elaborated a policy in favour of a interpretation of function of a public nature: the extent to which the body: Is publicly funded in carrying out the relevant function, or is exercising statutory powers, or

  2. Where judges do not follow precedent (or where they distinguish binding cases on dubious ...

    D got into his lorry and drove forward to push V's car out of the way; V was trapped between the two vehicles and died of her injuries. The House of Lords upheld D's conviction for manslaughter, and Lord Roskill added obiter that the Caldwell/Lawrence definition of recklessness should apply

  1. Judicial Precedent

    Freemans over "equal pay" and also in the case of Finnegan v, Clowney Youth Training Programme Ltd (1990) on the retirement age for women under the Sex Discrimination Act 1976. Further to the point of the European Court of Justice, all English courts are required to be consistent with the jurisdiction laid down from U.K.'s membership to the E.U.

  2. Common Law, the Doctrine of Precedent and Statutory Interpretation in Australia

    precedent should be a higher court in the same legal system or hierarchy of courts the case is being presented before. This simply means that the doctrine of precedent is restricted by the legal system the court deciding the case is in.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work