• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

What is the doctrine of precedent

Extracts from this document...


What is the doctrine of precedent? The doctrine of precedent is a form of reasoning and decision-making formed by case law. If a higher court has made a significant legal point in one case, it would be considered as binding in later courts. In order to understand this doctrine more clearly, it would be necessary to examine the hierarchy of the English Courts. The House of Lords holds the highest position, any decision made by them, would be binding to lower courts which filter down to the Court of Appeal, to the Crown Courts and County Courts. This is otherwise recognised as the doctrine of stare decisis, which means standing by what has been decided. This doctrine is a fundamental principle of English Law. The use of precedent is vital to the decision making process of the courts. ...read more.


This is evident in the earlier given example of Pickstone v. Freemans over "equal pay" and also in the case of Finnegan v, Clowney Youth Training Programme Ltd [1990] 2 All ER 546 on the retirement age for women under the Sex Discrimination Act 1976. Further to the point of the European Court of Justice, all English courts are required to be consistent with the jurisdiction laid down from U.K.'s membership to the E.U. particularly in relation to the Human Rights Act 1998. A persuasive precedent is different to a binding precedent in that the lower courts are unable to bind the higher courts to their decision, but can only be persuasive. As in the Mandla v. Dowell Lee case, we can identify how the House of Lords decision was swayed by the decision made in the Court of Appeal level in Australia. ...read more.


However, in attempt to overturn this principle, Lord Denning M.R. tried to make a House of Lords decision per incuriam. A previous court ruling can be labelled as per incuriam, i.e. the decision oversaw a number of significant material facts before submitting a legal rule. This attempt was made and condemned later in the House of Lords in Broome v. Cassell [1972] 2 Qb 354. Lord Denning M.R. tried to ignore the ratio in Rookes v Barnard [1964] AC 1129 with the reasoning that there was a significant oversight made by the Law Lords. When this case reached the House of Lords, Lord Hailsham stated, "In the hierarchical system of courts which exists in this country, it is necessary for each lower tier, including the Court of Appeal, to accept loyally the decisions of the higher tiers". This affirms the doctrine of precedent that lower courts cannot overturn the precedent set out in higher courts. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree English Legal System section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree English Legal System essays

  1. Law Making - Judicial Precedent.

    Most part time workers are woman. Part time workers were being sacked before full rights were achieved and so never did come into it. Didn't have dismissal rights. Delegated Legalisation Reasons for Delegated Legislation: - 1. Time The queen's speech sets out the typical plans of the government for the next parliamentary session.

  2. The ultra vires doctrine

    which it provided under contracted out arrangements with a number of local authorities. The claimants had lived at the home for over 17 years when LCF decided to close the home and to place the claimants in smaller, community-based units in the surrounding area 16 6.

  1. Discuss the operation of the doctrine of precedent in the Australian courts

    The case revolved around two migrants, Mr. and Mrs. Amadio who was unfamiliar had to sign a contract relating in favor of a mortgage of their land through a bank for their son. The son had told his parents that the mortgage was limited to $50,000 and was to be for six months.

  2. The doctrine of Precedent.

    6. Inferior courts (Crown Court, County Court, Magistrates' Court) do not create precedents and must follow decisions of all the above courts. THE HOUSE OF LORDS AND THE PRACTICE STATEMENT THE NEED FOE THE PRACTICE STATEMENT 1. From the middle of the 19th century the House of Lords generally regarded themselves as bound by their own past decisions (Beamish

  1. Where judges do not follow precedent (or where they distinguish binding cases on dubious ...

    In a similar way, dissenting judgements by judges in the appellate courts are sometimes treated as persuasive in later cases. Lower judges clearly cannot follow a dissenting judgement if it contradicts a binding precedent in the majority decision, but higher courts may do so.

  2. Judicial Precedent

    Binding precedents may also be considered on a European level at this point, where the affect of the European Court of Justice holds binding influence over the English legal system today. This is evident in the earlier given example of Pickstone v.

  1. Common Law, the Doctrine of Precedent and Statutory Interpretation in Australia

    precedent should be a higher court in the same legal system or hierarchy of courts the case is being presented before. This simply means that the doctrine of precedent is restricted by the legal system the court deciding the case is in.

  2. Judicial Precedent

    Commonwealth countries such as Canada, and Australia * obiter dicta, particularly where the comment was made in a House of Lords decision. This was seen in the case of R v Howe where the House of Lords ruled ratio decidendi that duress was not available as a defense to murder.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work