• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

What is the doctrine of precedent

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

What is the doctrine of precedent? The doctrine of precedent is a form of reasoning and decision-making formed by case law. If a higher court has made a significant legal point in one case, it would be considered as binding in later courts. In order to understand this doctrine more clearly, it would be necessary to examine the hierarchy of the English Courts. The House of Lords holds the highest position, any decision made by them, would be binding to lower courts which filter down to the Court of Appeal, to the Crown Courts and County Courts. This is otherwise recognised as the doctrine of stare decisis, which means standing by what has been decided. This doctrine is a fundamental principle of English Law. The use of precedent is vital to the decision making process of the courts. ...read more.

Middle

This is evident in the earlier given example of Pickstone v. Freemans over "equal pay" and also in the case of Finnegan v, Clowney Youth Training Programme Ltd [1990] 2 All ER 546 on the retirement age for women under the Sex Discrimination Act 1976. Further to the point of the European Court of Justice, all English courts are required to be consistent with the jurisdiction laid down from U.K.'s membership to the E.U. particularly in relation to the Human Rights Act 1998. A persuasive precedent is different to a binding precedent in that the lower courts are unable to bind the higher courts to their decision, but can only be persuasive. As in the Mandla v. Dowell Lee case, we can identify how the House of Lords decision was swayed by the decision made in the Court of Appeal level in Australia. ...read more.

Conclusion

However, in attempt to overturn this principle, Lord Denning M.R. tried to make a House of Lords decision per incuriam. A previous court ruling can be labelled as per incuriam, i.e. the decision oversaw a number of significant material facts before submitting a legal rule. This attempt was made and condemned later in the House of Lords in Broome v. Cassell [1972] 2 Qb 354. Lord Denning M.R. tried to ignore the ratio in Rookes v Barnard [1964] AC 1129 with the reasoning that there was a significant oversight made by the Law Lords. When this case reached the House of Lords, Lord Hailsham stated, "In the hierarchical system of courts which exists in this country, it is necessary for each lower tier, including the Court of Appeal, to accept loyally the decisions of the higher tiers". This affirms the doctrine of precedent that lower courts cannot overturn the precedent set out in higher courts. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree English Legal System section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree English Legal System essays

  1. The doctrine of Precedent.

    c) The Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) will normally follow its own past decisions, but has flexibility to depart from a decision where the liberty of a person is involved (R v Taylor (1950)). 4. a) Divisional courts must follow House of Lords and Court of Appeal decisions.

  2. Law Making - Judicial Precedent.

    Only if the rule fails should they progress to the next one. 1. The Literal Rule You give it is normal English meaning if you don't know what it is, you consult the Oxford Dictionary The literal approach will give the word its normal meaning.

  1. 'The scope of the flexibility of the doctrine of binding precedent has two sources; ...

    Where as, judicial dictum; will have been given considerable thought by the judge. The judicial dicta maybe so persuasive as to be practically indistinguishable from ratio.6 Thus this would suggest there is some flexibility. There are some cases where a court may not be bound by the ratio but have made a decision from the judicial dictum.

  2. The ultra vires doctrine

    or article 10(2) therefore unlikely to see any flood of such cases coming to court. The important case of Aston Cantlow20 helped to clarify some of the questions raised in early cases. The House of Lords found that the PCC was not a "core" public authority under s.6 of the

  1. Where judges do not follow precedent (or where they distinguish binding cases on dubious ...

    Although a majority of the House agreed that CC should succeed in the instant case, there was no legal principle commanding majority support and hence no ratio applicable more widely. A judge very rarely says explicitly what part of his decision is the ratio decidendi, but there are isolated exceptions.

  2. Judicial Precedent

    For example, Gomez followed the precedent held in Morris over appropriation in theft. The legal rule may also have been formed in the same level of court, as in the case of Regina v. Mazo (1997) and Regina v. Hinks (1998), where there were conflicting ratios made within the Court of Appeal over consent and appropriation.

  1. Judicial Precedent

    Commonwealth countries such as Canada, and Australia * obiter dicta, particularly where the comment was made in a House of Lords decision. This was seen in the case of R v Howe where the House of Lords ruled ratio decidendi that duress was not available as a defense to murder.

  2. Common Law, the Doctrine of Precedent and Statutory Interpretation in Australia

    precedent should be a higher court in the same legal system or hierarchy of courts the case is being presented before. This simply means that the doctrine of precedent is restricted by the legal system the court deciding the case is in.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work