• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

What is the doctrine of precedent

Extracts from this document...


What is the doctrine of precedent? The doctrine of precedent is a form of reasoning and decision-making formed by case law. If a higher court has made a significant legal point in one case, it would be considered as binding in later courts. In order to understand this doctrine more clearly, it would be necessary to examine the hierarchy of the English Courts. The House of Lords holds the highest position, any decision made by them, would be binding to lower courts which filter down to the Court of Appeal, to the Crown Courts and County Courts. This is otherwise recognised as the doctrine of stare decisis, which means standing by what has been decided. This doctrine is a fundamental principle of English Law. The use of precedent is vital to the decision making process of the courts. ...read more.


This is evident in the earlier given example of Pickstone v. Freemans over "equal pay" and also in the case of Finnegan v, Clowney Youth Training Programme Ltd [1990] 2 All ER 546 on the retirement age for women under the Sex Discrimination Act 1976. Further to the point of the European Court of Justice, all English courts are required to be consistent with the jurisdiction laid down from U.K.'s membership to the E.U. particularly in relation to the Human Rights Act 1998. A persuasive precedent is different to a binding precedent in that the lower courts are unable to bind the higher courts to their decision, but can only be persuasive. As in the Mandla v. Dowell Lee case, we can identify how the House of Lords decision was swayed by the decision made in the Court of Appeal level in Australia. ...read more.


However, in attempt to overturn this principle, Lord Denning M.R. tried to make a House of Lords decision per incuriam. A previous court ruling can be labelled as per incuriam, i.e. the decision oversaw a number of significant material facts before submitting a legal rule. This attempt was made and condemned later in the House of Lords in Broome v. Cassell [1972] 2 Qb 354. Lord Denning M.R. tried to ignore the ratio in Rookes v Barnard [1964] AC 1129 with the reasoning that there was a significant oversight made by the Law Lords. When this case reached the House of Lords, Lord Hailsham stated, "In the hierarchical system of courts which exists in this country, it is necessary for each lower tier, including the Court of Appeal, to accept loyally the decisions of the higher tiers". This affirms the doctrine of precedent that lower courts cannot overturn the precedent set out in higher courts. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree English Legal System section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree English Legal System essays

  1. The doctrine of Precedent.

    However, where there are conflicting past decisions, 'the later decision is to be preferred if it is reached after full consideration of the earlier decisions' (Colchester Estates v Carlton Industries (1984)). 6. Inferior courts (Crown Court, County Court, Magistrates' Court)

  2. Law Making - Judicial Precedent.

    The judge looks at the original statute and the purpose for which it was passed. The judge is allowed to slightly change the wording to enable the statute to achieve its purpose R v Allen 1872 Offence of bigamy "Anyone who marries, when already married" Under English law you can only marry one person at a time.

  1. The ultra vires doctrine

    If the (PCC) could not be characterised as "public" then it is difficult to see how any other institutions that are not obviously "core" public authorities, such as charities, hospitals, or schools, should be caught by s 6 when doing something much less invasive as employing people or organising their own finances.

  2. 'The scope of the flexibility of the doctrine of binding precedent has two sources; ...

    Gratis dicta can be translated as being free; it has no value or persuasive force. Gratis dicta is the judges thought that has no mean as not much thought has been put in it. Gratis dicta should not influence the flexibility of binding precedent.

  1. Where judges do not follow precedent (or where they distinguish binding cases on dubious ...

    PP sued for negligent misrepresentation and the judge applied the principles set out by the House of Lords in Hedley Byrne v Heller [1963] 2 All ER 575. Academic lawyers, he said, might argue that those principles were obiter dicta and that he was bound by the contrary decision of

  2. Judicial Precedent

    For example, Gomez followed the precedent held in Morris over appropriation in theft. The legal rule may also have been formed in the same level of court, as in the case of Regina v. Mazo (1997) and Regina v. Hinks (1998), where there were conflicting ratios made within the Court of Appeal over consent and appropriation.

  1. Judicial Precedent

    Commonwealth countries such as Canada, and Australia * obiter dicta, particularly where the comment was made in a House of Lords decision. This was seen in the case of R v Howe where the House of Lords ruled ratio decidendi that duress was not available as a defense to murder.

  2. The problem with precedent.

    The romantic view is that the earliest judicial decisions were made by the `wandering justices' of the 13th century, who travelled the land at the King's behest, applying and unifying the existing law of the land. The pragmatic view is that the English common law results from an attempt by

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work