• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

What is the doctrine of precedent

Extracts from this document...


What is the doctrine of precedent? The doctrine of precedent is a form of reasoning and decision-making formed by case law. If a higher court has made a significant legal point in one case, it would be considered as binding in later courts. In order to understand this doctrine more clearly, it would be necessary to examine the hierarchy of the English Courts. The House of Lords holds the highest position, any decision made by them, would be binding to lower courts which filter down to the Court of Appeal, to the Crown Courts and County Courts. This is otherwise recognised as the doctrine of stare decisis, which means standing by what has been decided. This doctrine is a fundamental principle of English Law. The use of precedent is vital to the decision making process of the courts. ...read more.


This is evident in the earlier given example of Pickstone v. Freemans over "equal pay" and also in the case of Finnegan v, Clowney Youth Training Programme Ltd [1990] 2 All ER 546 on the retirement age for women under the Sex Discrimination Act 1976. Further to the point of the European Court of Justice, all English courts are required to be consistent with the jurisdiction laid down from U.K.'s membership to the E.U. particularly in relation to the Human Rights Act 1998. A persuasive precedent is different to a binding precedent in that the lower courts are unable to bind the higher courts to their decision, but can only be persuasive. As in the Mandla v. Dowell Lee case, we can identify how the House of Lords decision was swayed by the decision made in the Court of Appeal level in Australia. ...read more.


However, in attempt to overturn this principle, Lord Denning M.R. tried to make a House of Lords decision per incuriam. A previous court ruling can be labelled as per incuriam, i.e. the decision oversaw a number of significant material facts before submitting a legal rule. This attempt was made and condemned later in the House of Lords in Broome v. Cassell [1972] 2 Qb 354. Lord Denning M.R. tried to ignore the ratio in Rookes v Barnard [1964] AC 1129 with the reasoning that there was a significant oversight made by the Law Lords. When this case reached the House of Lords, Lord Hailsham stated, "In the hierarchical system of courts which exists in this country, it is necessary for each lower tier, including the Court of Appeal, to accept loyally the decisions of the higher tiers". This affirms the doctrine of precedent that lower courts cannot overturn the precedent set out in higher courts. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree English Legal System section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree English Legal System essays

  1. Where judges do not follow precedent (or where they distinguish binding cases on dubious ...

    Fitzsimons v Ford Motor Co [1946] 1 All ER 429, CA A workman P contracted Raynaud's disease as a result of vibration in the drill he had to use, and claimed for an industrial accident under the Workmen's Compensation Act 1925.

  2. Discuss the operation of the doctrine of precedent in the Australian courts

    Actually the mortgage held an unlimited liability. The bank was aware of this 'special disadvantage' of Mr. and Mrs. Amadio. The couple had lack of knowledge of English because of which, they could not interpret the documents. Although aware of this situation, the bank could have provided professional advice on this matter.

  1. The ultra vires doctrine

    Act 1985, pending a decision as to whether she was intentionally homeless. The property was later transferred to Poplar, which had been created by the council. In September 1999 the council decided that D was intentionally homeless and Poplar commenced proceedings for possession, having served notice under s.21 (4)

  2. The doctrine of Precedent.

    However, where there are conflicting past decisions, 'the later decision is to be preferred if it is reached after full consideration of the earlier decisions' (Colchester Estates v Carlton Industries (1984)). 6. Inferior courts (Crown Court, County Court, Magistrates' Court)

  1. 'The scope of the flexibility of the doctrine of binding precedent has two sources; ...

    We find this in the Practice Statement of Lord Gardiner (1966). This simply allows the House of Lords to adjust and review laws and previously binding precedents that are regarded as outdated or no longer 'good law'. An example of this can be found in the case of R v.

  2. Law Making - Judicial Precedent.

    1944 which said that the COA can change its own decisions: - 1. When there are 2 conflicting decisions 2. When the HOL overrules it 3. If it can be proven the decision was wrong (PER INCURIAM) High Court This court is not required to follow its own decisions.

  1. Common Law, the Doctrine of Precedent and Statutory Interpretation in Australia

    precedent should be a higher court in the same legal system or hierarchy of courts the case is being presented before. This simply means that the doctrine of precedent is restricted by the legal system the court deciding the case is in.

  2. Judicial Precedent

    I feel that the efficiency of the system would be improved if the two parts of the speech were clearly defined. A binding precedent would be established by a legal rule formed in a position of the higher courts of the hierarchy, either the Court of Appeal or the House of Lords.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work