• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

What is the doctrine of precedent

Extracts from this document...


What is the doctrine of precedent? The doctrine of precedent is a form of reasoning and decision-making formed by case law. If a higher court has made a significant legal point in one case, it would be considered as binding in later courts. In order to understand this doctrine more clearly, it would be necessary to examine the hierarchy of the English Courts. The House of Lords holds the highest position, any decision made by them, would be binding to lower courts which filter down to the Court of Appeal, to the Crown Courts and County Courts. This is otherwise recognised as the doctrine of stare decisis, which means standing by what has been decided. This doctrine is a fundamental principle of English Law. The use of precedent is vital to the decision making process of the courts. ...read more.


This is evident in the earlier given example of Pickstone v. Freemans over "equal pay" and also in the case of Finnegan v, Clowney Youth Training Programme Ltd [1990] 2 All ER 546 on the retirement age for women under the Sex Discrimination Act 1976. Further to the point of the European Court of Justice, all English courts are required to be consistent with the jurisdiction laid down from U.K.'s membership to the E.U. particularly in relation to the Human Rights Act 1998. A persuasive precedent is different to a binding precedent in that the lower courts are unable to bind the higher courts to their decision, but can only be persuasive. As in the Mandla v. Dowell Lee case, we can identify how the House of Lords decision was swayed by the decision made in the Court of Appeal level in Australia. ...read more.


However, in attempt to overturn this principle, Lord Denning M.R. tried to make a House of Lords decision per incuriam. A previous court ruling can be labelled as per incuriam, i.e. the decision oversaw a number of significant material facts before submitting a legal rule. This attempt was made and condemned later in the House of Lords in Broome v. Cassell [1972] 2 Qb 354. Lord Denning M.R. tried to ignore the ratio in Rookes v Barnard [1964] AC 1129 with the reasoning that there was a significant oversight made by the Law Lords. When this case reached the House of Lords, Lord Hailsham stated, "In the hierarchical system of courts which exists in this country, it is necessary for each lower tier, including the Court of Appeal, to accept loyally the decisions of the higher tiers". This affirms the doctrine of precedent that lower courts cannot overturn the precedent set out in higher courts. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree English Legal System section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree English Legal System essays

  1. Law Making - Judicial Precedent.

    Most part time workers are woman. Part time workers were being sacked before full rights were achieved and so never did come into it. Didn't have dismissal rights. Delegated Legalisation Reasons for Delegated Legislation: - 1. Time The queen's speech sets out the typical plans of the government for the next parliamentary session.

  2. The doctrine of Precedent.

    The ruling in London Tramways v London County Council had the effect of making the law to rigid. 4. In 1966 the Lord Chancellor issued the Practice Statement giving the House of Lords flexibility to depart from past decisions.

  1. 'The scope of the flexibility of the doctrine of binding precedent has two sources; ...

    Therefore another advantage can be found in the rigidity the use of precedent can create. In the viewpoint of those active in the judicial system precedent is extremely useful.

  2. Discuss the operation of the doctrine of precedent in the Australian courts

    This principle will usually be stated in the case itself. Typically the rule will be laid down in one case and followed, developed and interpreted in the other cases. This is known as Ratio Decidendi. The limitations of ratio decidendi can be described as, firstly, the ratio is the revered

  1. The ultra vires doctrine

    general public or to individuals as public functions unless they involve the exercise of coercive power to special authority, both because of the difficulties in defining and limiting the extent of this form of vertical effect of the Act, and because such treatment legitimates state control of many activities by

  2. Where judges do not follow precedent (or where they distinguish binding cases on dubious ...

    J's mother sought an order compelling the doctors to give "all available treatment" to preserve his life, but the Court of Appeal refused to make such an order. Lord Donaldson MR said it would be an abuse of power for the court to order a doctor to carry out treatment which he believed contrary to his duty to his patient.

  1. Judicial Precedent

    particularly in relation to the Human Rights Act 1998. As stated the judicial precedent system relies heavily on an accurate system of law reporting. Even nowadays, with a computer database holding details of nearly half a million cases, it is still difficult to find the relevant case law.

  2. Common Law, the Doctrine of Precedent and Statutory Interpretation in Australia

    precedent should be a higher court in the same legal system or hierarchy of courts the case is being presented before. This simply means that the doctrine of precedent is restricted by the legal system the court deciding the case is in.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work