• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

With reference to case law, discuss the difficulties surrounding the legal tests used to identify a contract of employment.

Extracts from this document...


Employment Law Coursework 1 Title "Certainly there is no one factor which marks out a contract of employment. A factor which is important in one case may be insignificant or not present in the next". (Michael Jefferson, Principles of Employment Law) With reference to case law, discuss the difficulties surrounding the legal tests used to identify a contract of employment. Word Guidance: 2000 Words Hand in date: Monday November 17th 2003 Most people, I think, could answer the question "Are you an employee?". Some people may answer yes, while others, those being self-employed, will reply in the negative. However, as simple the question appears, in law a positive result gives significant rights and obligations. It is imperative therefore that an employee be distinguished from a independent contractor. It is said that an employee works under a contract of service, whereas an independent contractor works under a contract for services. In my opinion, that distinction does nothing to help distinguish, indeed it perhaps confuses, the situation. There are a multitude of rights that flow from being an employee which are not available to independent contractors. These include written particulars of employment; unfair dismissal, redundancy, equal pay, statutory sick pay and maternity rights; health and safety provisions; rights to statutory and contractual notice periods; social security payments; amongst many others. ...read more.


The fact that the drivers could delegate their duties was crucial as this is not something seen in employment contracts. The test has now been accepted by the courts. The first limb of the test can be seen from Lord Thankerton's adapted control test in Short v J & W Henderson7. Adrian Williams argues that the inclusion of "or other renumerartion" can be criticised in that it doesn't distinguish between the regular salaries paid to employees and the lump generally paid to independent contractors. The second test is merely a restatement of the control test. In Market Investigations v Minister of Social Security8, Cooke J observed that "control will no doubt always have to be considered, although it can no longer be regarded as the sole decisive factor". In that case, Cooke J considered the third limb of the test. The question to be determined by the court was whether a person was in business on his own account. That case concerned an interviewer who carried out market research part time. She could do the work at whatever time she wished, provided that it was done within the given time. It was held that she was an employee. ...read more.


Likewise, in Motorola v Davidson20, the employer had a sufficient degree of day to day control, which made the worker an employee. All the relevant factors need to be considered, and as long as the employment tribunal takes these into account, their decision will be a question of fact and their finding can not be challenged unless they came to the conclusion which could not be reasonably obtained by any other tribunal. The only thing that is certain is that if there is control, no delegation and a mutuality of obligation the court should find a contract of employment. Going back the original question, it is clear that the tests created by the Courts were inadequate in a modern society. The courts now tend to look at a multitude of factors in deciding employee status. The most important factor, it seems, will be mutuality of obligations. Adrian Williams concludes his article by suggesting that statutory intervention is necessary. I agree that because of the importance and number of rights an 'employee' will receive, it is paramount that the courts can determine worker status accurately. I find it difficult to see though how a statutory test would advance the position we are in now, the position of painting a picture of all factors and balancing them out. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree Contract Law section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree Contract Law essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Of all of the elements which make up the definition of theft, which are ...

    3 star(s)

    where the defendant received gifts from a man of limited intelligence (Ashworth, 2006). It can be seen that perhaps the law is protecting the vulnerable against exploitation by doing this and ensuring that dishonest behaviour is a huge element and therefore provides the main factor in theft.

  2. The Main Requirements of a Simple Legal Binding Contract - Law of Contract.

    The ship was requisitioned by the French government before the charter began, and so there was no hire earnt. An express term will override a term otherwise implied by custom, the commission was payable on hire. Terms implied by statute:- certain statutes imply terms into particular types of contract.

  1. Consideration - in the existence of a contract.

    The exception to this was if a further gift was granted then this could, because consideration need not be adequate. The court appears to view money as only being money but an object has the value given to it by an agreement; this may seem a little odd but it

  2. This executive summary deals with the Marilyn M. case.

    product and 10% for the cash flows without the new product (exhibit(?)). The reason I have chosen 12% as the rate for the Marilyn M. cash flow is for two reasons: first it represents that the Marilyn M. project is riskier.

  1. misrepresentation-problm question

    Smith was aware of this and it was held to be misrepresentation. In this case Bowen LJ said that where "the facts are equally known to both parties, what one party says to the other is frequently nothing but an expression of opinion...But if facts are not equally known to

  2. Critically examine and discuss the inter-relationship between the law of Contract and the law ...

    is recognised as the case of, Junior Books v Veitchi Co Ltd12, where the plaintiffs entered into a contract with A to build a warehouse. The defendants were nominated subcontractors for the flooring. The House of Lords held that the plaintiffs could have a tort action against the defendants even

  1. Business Law The Law of Contract

    It is presumed that this is the intention in normal commercial contract. In the case of Balfour v Balfour (1919) Mr Balfour had agreed to give his wife �30 a month for maintenance while he was living abroad. Once he had left, they separated and the payments stopped.

  2. Contract law - review of cases.

    And there is a rule called ?postal acceptance rule? in which an acceptance is sent through a mail. It helps to indicate the time when all parties create or revoke a contract through mail, and does not apple to option contracts (case Adams v Lindsell ? 1818) in the appendix).

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work