• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

With reference to case law, discuss the difficulties surrounding the legal tests used to identify a contract of employment.

Extracts from this document...


Employment Law Coursework 1 Title "Certainly there is no one factor which marks out a contract of employment. A factor which is important in one case may be insignificant or not present in the next". (Michael Jefferson, Principles of Employment Law) With reference to case law, discuss the difficulties surrounding the legal tests used to identify a contract of employment. Word Guidance: 2000 Words Hand in date: Monday November 17th 2003 Most people, I think, could answer the question "Are you an employee?". Some people may answer yes, while others, those being self-employed, will reply in the negative. However, as simple the question appears, in law a positive result gives significant rights and obligations. It is imperative therefore that an employee be distinguished from a independent contractor. It is said that an employee works under a contract of service, whereas an independent contractor works under a contract for services. In my opinion, that distinction does nothing to help distinguish, indeed it perhaps confuses, the situation. There are a multitude of rights that flow from being an employee which are not available to independent contractors. These include written particulars of employment; unfair dismissal, redundancy, equal pay, statutory sick pay and maternity rights; health and safety provisions; rights to statutory and contractual notice periods; social security payments; amongst many others. ...read more.


The fact that the drivers could delegate their duties was crucial as this is not something seen in employment contracts. The test has now been accepted by the courts. The first limb of the test can be seen from Lord Thankerton's adapted control test in Short v J & W Henderson7. Adrian Williams argues that the inclusion of "or other renumerartion" can be criticised in that it doesn't distinguish between the regular salaries paid to employees and the lump generally paid to independent contractors. The second test is merely a restatement of the control test. In Market Investigations v Minister of Social Security8, Cooke J observed that "control will no doubt always have to be considered, although it can no longer be regarded as the sole decisive factor". In that case, Cooke J considered the third limb of the test. The question to be determined by the court was whether a person was in business on his own account. That case concerned an interviewer who carried out market research part time. She could do the work at whatever time she wished, provided that it was done within the given time. It was held that she was an employee. ...read more.


Likewise, in Motorola v Davidson20, the employer had a sufficient degree of day to day control, which made the worker an employee. All the relevant factors need to be considered, and as long as the employment tribunal takes these into account, their decision will be a question of fact and their finding can not be challenged unless they came to the conclusion which could not be reasonably obtained by any other tribunal. The only thing that is certain is that if there is control, no delegation and a mutuality of obligation the court should find a contract of employment. Going back the original question, it is clear that the tests created by the Courts were inadequate in a modern society. The courts now tend to look at a multitude of factors in deciding employee status. The most important factor, it seems, will be mutuality of obligations. Adrian Williams concludes his article by suggesting that statutory intervention is necessary. I agree that because of the importance and number of rights an 'employee' will receive, it is paramount that the courts can determine worker status accurately. I find it difficult to see though how a statutory test would advance the position we are in now, the position of painting a picture of all factors and balancing them out. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree Contract Law section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree Contract Law essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Of all of the elements which make up the definition of theft, which are ...

    3 star(s)

    where the defendant received gifts from a man of limited intelligence (Ashworth, 2006). It can be seen that perhaps the law is protecting the vulnerable against exploitation by doing this and ensuring that dishonest behaviour is a huge element and therefore provides the main factor in theft.

  2. The Main Requirements of a Simple Legal Binding Contract - Law of Contract.

    The ship was requisitioned by the French government before the charter began, and so there was no hire earnt. An express term will override a term otherwise implied by custom, the commission was payable on hire. Terms implied by statute:- certain statutes imply terms into particular types of contract.

  1. This executive summary deals with the Marilyn M. case.

    Under the heading of character criteria, Ashleigh must maintain good communication between themselves and Royal Bank, submitting any information deemed important to the line of credit when requested by Nancy Featherstone. As indicated in the case, this requirement appears to have been met as their account required little supervision and has met and exceeded budget targets.

  2. misrepresentation-problm question

    However Lord Denning distinguished between this, where two parties negotiating a contract, are able to equally form an opinion, or, as in the case of Esso Petroleum Ltd. v Mardon [1976] QB 801 one party has special knowledge or skill.

  1. Law of the work Place - Unfair dismissal

    had the power to substitute himself for another when he pleased, thus, the court ruled, because of this, that he was self employed. In the case Hall v Lorimor7 the court listed ten factors that were relevant when deducting whether a person was self employed or an employee.

  2. Discuss the significant features of the Contract (Rights of Third Parties) Act. Is its ...

    In fact, according to Catherine Macmillan 'One of the reasons for reform was the existence of non-comprehensive exceptions to the privity rule.' The privity doctrine has been criticised as a source of injustice on the basis that it both frustrates the intentions of the contracting parties and disappoints the legitimate expectations of the third party (Kincaid).

  1. Business Law The Law of Contract

    meaning must be claie and match the nature of the defense to which it is to be put. * It must not be prevented by statute * The contract must remain intact that the clause has some legal force. Is the Exclusion Clause valid?

  2. Critically examine and discuss the inter-relationship between the law of Contract and the law ...

    impossible to prove his expectancy, but he will not be able to use this to escape a bargain which the defendant can show would have been a bad one even if the contract had been performed.2 The history of tort and contractual liability can be written as the history of

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work