• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

With reference to case law, discuss the difficulties surrounding the legal tests used to identify a contract of employment.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Employment Law Coursework 1 Title "Certainly there is no one factor which marks out a contract of employment. A factor which is important in one case may be insignificant or not present in the next". (Michael Jefferson, Principles of Employment Law) With reference to case law, discuss the difficulties surrounding the legal tests used to identify a contract of employment. Word Guidance: 2000 Words Hand in date: Monday November 17th 2003 Most people, I think, could answer the question "Are you an employee?". Some people may answer yes, while others, those being self-employed, will reply in the negative. However, as simple the question appears, in law a positive result gives significant rights and obligations. It is imperative therefore that an employee be distinguished from a independent contractor. It is said that an employee works under a contract of service, whereas an independent contractor works under a contract for services. In my opinion, that distinction does nothing to help distinguish, indeed it perhaps confuses, the situation. There are a multitude of rights that flow from being an employee which are not available to independent contractors. These include written particulars of employment; unfair dismissal, redundancy, equal pay, statutory sick pay and maternity rights; health and safety provisions; rights to statutory and contractual notice periods; social security payments; amongst many others. ...read more.

Middle

The fact that the drivers could delegate their duties was crucial as this is not something seen in employment contracts. The test has now been accepted by the courts. The first limb of the test can be seen from Lord Thankerton's adapted control test in Short v J & W Henderson7. Adrian Williams argues that the inclusion of "or other renumerartion" can be criticised in that it doesn't distinguish between the regular salaries paid to employees and the lump generally paid to independent contractors. The second test is merely a restatement of the control test. In Market Investigations v Minister of Social Security8, Cooke J observed that "control will no doubt always have to be considered, although it can no longer be regarded as the sole decisive factor". In that case, Cooke J considered the third limb of the test. The question to be determined by the court was whether a person was in business on his own account. That case concerned an interviewer who carried out market research part time. She could do the work at whatever time she wished, provided that it was done within the given time. It was held that she was an employee. ...read more.

Conclusion

Likewise, in Motorola v Davidson20, the employer had a sufficient degree of day to day control, which made the worker an employee. All the relevant factors need to be considered, and as long as the employment tribunal takes these into account, their decision will be a question of fact and their finding can not be challenged unless they came to the conclusion which could not be reasonably obtained by any other tribunal. The only thing that is certain is that if there is control, no delegation and a mutuality of obligation the court should find a contract of employment. Going back the original question, it is clear that the tests created by the Courts were inadequate in a modern society. The courts now tend to look at a multitude of factors in deciding employee status. The most important factor, it seems, will be mutuality of obligations. Adrian Williams concludes his article by suggesting that statutory intervention is necessary. I agree that because of the importance and number of rights an 'employee' will receive, it is paramount that the courts can determine worker status accurately. I find it difficult to see though how a statutory test would advance the position we are in now, the position of painting a picture of all factors and balancing them out. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree Contract Law section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree Contract Law essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Of all of the elements which make up the definition of theft, which are ...

    3 star(s)

    where the defendant received gifts from a man of limited intelligence (Ashworth, 2006). It can be seen that perhaps the law is protecting the vulnerable against exploitation by doing this and ensuring that dishonest behaviour is a huge element and therefore provides the main factor in theft.

  2. The Main Requirements of a Simple Legal Binding Contract - Law of Contract.

    For example a tenant who may be moving into a house will assume that an implied term of contract would include the rights of tenants. Les Affreteurs V Walford 1919, in this case a charter of a ship was provided and it was the custom of the trade for the payment to be made at a later stage.

  1. misrepresentation-problm question

    The take-over was not successful and the claimants brought an action against the defendants alleging that they had negligently prepared the accounts. The Court of Appeal dismissed the action on the ground that the representation did not play a 'real and substantial' part in inducing the claimants to act.

  2. Critically examine how the law on exclusion clauses in contracts has developed and the ...

    true when trying to establish a course of dealing with a consumer. One example of this situation is Hollier v Rambler Motors (AMC) Ltd [1972] 2 QB 71, [1972] 1 All ER 399 the defendants relied on an exclusion clause, in their standard repair form, that stated they would not be liable for fire damage.

  1. Discuss the significant features of the Contract (Rights of Third Parties) Act. Is its ...

    to the third party by the privity doctrine, since, where reasonable expectations have been created in C by a contract made to confer some benefit on him between A and B, it is considered unjust by many for the law to deny C any benefit, especially where C has relied on the contract to regulate his affairs.

  2. Business Law The Law of Contract

    Is the Exclusion Clause valid? As it must form a part of the contract, all parties must be aware of it. This is usually by a signature on a contract. It is not usually possible to go against an exclusion clause to which the accusing party has put a signature on the grounds that they did not see the clause.

  1. Contract Law - P.Q/2

    time a good and ergonomic residence of steady condition without having to engage another contractor. We proceed now with the second part of the question addressed and this concerns Jim's part in the scenario's facts. While Neil sub-contracting with Jim at the very beginning, Jim had quoted a price of

  2. Law of the work Place - Unfair dismissal

    This brought the organisation and integration test in to play as a means to decide whether a contract of employment exists. The case where integration was first introduced was Stevenson, Jordan & Harrison v MacDonald & Evans5. This test involved the courts looking at whether the services or work carried

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work