One of the most outstanding Irish playwrights of the twentieth century, who is generally recognized not only in his native country, but internationally as well, is Frank McGuinness. Born in County Donegal he graduated from the University of Dublin after having studied mythology and medieval literature. His writing career started with poetry, which consequently transformed into plays that are now performed all over the world. His celebrated works include The Factory Girls, Mary and Lizzie, The Bread Man and many more. McGuinness, like every outstanding artist of the world, has put most of his hidden intrinsic abilities into his plays.  From 1982 onwards, the writer has been contributing the inmost writing abilities on the dramatics that reveal important social and psychological problems of modern society.  

       One of McGuinness’ most outstanding plays Someone Who’ll Watch Over Me was inspired by a series of hostage sieges in the 1980’s. Although he did not touch the political motives of the executioners in his play, McGuinness devoted the major part of the text to the problem of relationships between the three imprisoned men. He revealed what he considered was most important in human relationships in this kind of extreme situation: he tried to show what strains of personality might uncover when one is captured and held in prison in enormously atrocious  conditions.

     The three imprisoned men are the representatives of England, the United States and Ireland: Michael, a British professor, Adam, an American doctor, and Edward, an Irish journalist. A dreadful boredom together with the horror of facing death is the basis for all the other anxieties they feel. At first the three men are aggressive and hostile, treating one another as though they are enemies. They fail to realize that the real enemies are those political terrorists who keep them imprisoned in Beirut. Initially the hostages fail to understand that they need to support and help each other, rather than constantly causing assault and offence. However, over time they recognize that they are the only real support and salvation left for each other.  It is only through this understanding that they find the compassion and the imagination they need to enable them to survive their ordeal.  Through time they also accept the fact that it is highly probable that they would not get out of the prison in the nearest future; if they could actually ever get out of it alive.

     The author reveals a completely new understanding of life conditions that are not frequently encountered by a normal modern person. In fact, most people cannot imagine their behaviour as a reaction upon such matters as terrorism, imprisonment and the fear of death. McGuinness’ play helps the audience to get a better understanding of what people feel under such terrible circumstances. The protagonists of the play at the very beginning of their suffering find it impossible to accommodate the despair and horrors that surround them, but still they manage to save respect and understanding of each other. When their isolation increases and they lose hope for freedom, they find strength in caring for each other, even though they know they might face the reality of death soon.  

     The conditions, in which the three prisoners spend most of the play, are intolerable: the three men are chained to a wall, which is covered with Islamic graffito. The few possessions they have access to are the Bible and the Koran. McGuinness does not highlight the political aspect of the plot. He pays great attention to the isolation and depression of those men, who are seized as hostages and kept imprisoned by the will of fate. The playwright detaches the protagonists from time and place: the cell has no windows and the guard is never seen. This isolation enables McGuinness to emphasize the boredom and horrifying thoughts that are based on their uncertain destiny. McGuinness dramatizes these feelings of the imprisoned men by making the audience realize: they have actually committed no crime except for being in the wrong place at the wrong time. The playwright also pays particular attention to the change in moods and attitudes of these men towards each other.  These attitude changes are referred to by  Michael who refers to the Old English poem “The Wanderer” from which he narrates ‘Oft him anhaga are gebideth’, when translated reads ‘A man who is alone may at times feel mercy, mercy towards himself.’ They have discussions on various topics: movies, sports, family, sex, and religion. They tell different stories, recite poems, sing songs, hold arguments on historical and political issues, and write imaginary letters home. All this makes the audience first feel the horror and depression of their situation and then great sympathy for the Lebanon prisoners.

Join now!

       The “unseen enemy” (the hostage takers), who play an important role in creating the right atmosphere, are not actually seen throughout the whole play. This method employed by the author makes the role of the guards and their lack of physical presence even more frightening.  The existence of the enemy is the main reason of the initial isolation and fears of the imprisoned men. This is also the major psychological tool of intimidation. The victims have not seen the threat, thus they are able to create the threat in their own minds from all the things they ...

This is a preview of the whole essay