Vollono

Nick Vollono

Katherine Hamilton

21 January 2009

Frankenstein’s Colonialism

        Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein sits in the collective conscious as the ultimate scary story; the seminal text on what the Western monster manifests itself as.  When analyzing the complex relationship between the monster and Frankenstein, and together the effect of sexuality, a lesser said, more engrained message comes forth, which involves Shelley’s investigation of the fears of her era.  The monster is created as the ultimate incarnation of Otherness, where he is seen as so far different from “us” that our own identity is formed in reference to the monster.  Victor’s identity is formed in a similar way, as the monster symbolizes everything that Victor tries to not be, but at the same time is a manifestation of all that Victor represents.  Shelley reveals this dynamic characterization through scenes that involve sex and death.  In the end, the two themes of omnipotence and procreation are tied together as Frankenstein’s ultimate desire, while the monster represents not only a manifestation of those wants, but an opposing symbol of the projection of society’s fears and beliefs regarding sexuality.  

Frankenstein remains isolated from his family for months while creating his monster.  Having finished his creation, Victor dreams that he is kissing his true love, Elizabeth, but as he kisses her she turns into the dead corpse of his mother.  He awakens to the sight of his monster staring at him, framing Frankenstein as an object of desire.  “He held up the curtain of the bed; and his eyes, if eyes they may be called, were fixed on me.” (59)  This fixed gaze that the monster has on Frankenstein parallels the very gaze in Victor’s dream, during his first and only sexual contact with Elizabeth.  Although bringing up the recurring theme of domestic love, his dream reveals less about a repressed desire of love for his mother, than an inability to accept the domesticating aspects of a nurturer.  Essentially he creates a mirror image of himself, but the major difference is the monster’s ability to subvert the culture which would otherwise force Victor into a father and husband role.

Join now!

Frankenstein through this scene shows his narcissistic view of his creation.  “A new species would bless me as its creator and source; many happy and excellent natures would owe their being to me.  No father could claim the gratitude of his child so completely as I should deserve theirs.” (55)  Frankenstein places himself so highly on his own scale of importance, that it becomes clear his creation is very much a reflection of his own wishes to be able to procreate without a woman, and in the case of the monster, creation without life.  This projection of desire ultimately ties ...

This is a preview of the whole essay