• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

It is my opinion that no one person can be held responsible for the tragic deaths of the two lovers, Romeo and Juliet. Rather it is a combination of people and circumstances that contrive to form a tragic ending.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Final Draft for Coursework assignment. It is my opinion that no one person can be held responsible for the tragic deaths of the two lovers, Romeo and Juliet. Rather it is a combination of people and circumstances that contrive to form a tragic ending. Obviously, Romeo and Juliet is a tragedy, and thus has all the generic features of a tragedy; that there is a fatal flaw on the part of the main characters, in this case their passionate love at first sight for each other, "Did my heart love 'till now?" This passionate love means the two lovers cannot be separated, and their desperation to be together could be the reason for their plight. Alternatively, it could also be argued that Shakespeare built up dramatic expectation, via prophetic fallacy and short scenes accelerating to a climax, that the death was necessary as a dramatic ending. This structure can be clearly seen throughout the play as a whole as Shakespeare uses lower status characters (talking in prose) usually to speed up the pace, using riots and conflicts, whereas he uses the higher status characters (talking in verse) at balls or parties to slow down the pace and deepen the play. Therefore, due to Shakespeare's deliberately convoluted plot, it is imperative to discuss each topic in turn, evaluating how and to what extent, each factor was responsible; starting with, arguably, one of the most important reasons; fate, or chance. ...read more.

Middle

This first scene cleverly reflects Act 3 scene 1, but Shakespeare has changed the roles so that Romeo discards his pacifist views and is provoked into " fire-eyed fury." When Shakespeare draws references to Italy, he may be reflecting the traditional, and rather stereotypical, view of Italians as all having private vendettas or feuds. However, to a certain extent it works as Shakespeare is using a literary technique of setting the events in a place the Elizabethan audience would not know about apart from what they've been told. In particular, by leaving the facts unclear about the "ancient grudge," one begins to feel that perhaps there wasn't one, or that it has escalated out f all control. This is used for dramatic irony, as it is in inverse proportion to the amount of destruction incurred by the end of the final scene, "all are punished!" Another reason which Shakespeare decided to introduce was the Friar's own motives. He says, to Romeo, that he wants to " turn your household's rancour to pure love", but he seems wary to allow the lovers to wed in public and appears more intent of the joining of the two households than that the two lovers are together, "for this alliance may so happy prove". ...read more.

Conclusion

It can be argued that the structure of the play therefore reflects the pair's turbulent relations as when they are harmonious the pace is slowed, and this is then sped up when the two are desperately seeking each other. Perhaps the tragic ending is Shakespeare's way of rebuking both "love at first sight" and the artificial, chivalric love between Rosaline and Romeo. In conclusion, as can be seen from the discussed reasons; there are, as with all of Shakespeare's plays a multitude of factors, which are all equally valid and viable. Also, all of Shakespeare's language is intentional, so he is able to cleverly link both individual passages and whole scenes to the play as a whole. However, Shakespeare emphasises some more than others and in this respect I believe it is fate, which is the most predominantly mentioned of the factors. This is consistently mentioned by Shakespeare and lends itself to the play as a whole well. As previously discussed it lends a feeling of impending doom, and inevitable tragedy to the play. This factor could have become too linear, so Shakespeare introduced the idea of chance, which adds a random and chaotic air to the play. Also, all of Shakespeare's language is intentional, so he is able to cleverly link both individual passages and whole scenes to the play as a whole. Craig Brown 10h ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree Romeo and Juliet section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree Romeo and Juliet essays

  1. For never was a story of such woe than that of Juliet and her ...

    My ghostly father, no. I have forgot that name, and that name's woe. What is the guarantee that if he did marry Juliet and live peacefully with here, if he saw a more beautiful woman, that he would not have forgotten Juliet as quickly as he did Rosaline?

  2. HOW DOES DRAMATIC IRONY AFFECT THE AUDIEDIENCE IN ROMEO AND JULIET?

    The Globe catered to everyone; common people, merchants, professionals, soldiers, and even the aristocracy. Shakespeare in his turn had to do the same, creating plays that would appeal to every strata of society. It also has been estimated that about 20 to 25 per cent of the population attended the playhouses, which is a far higher percentage than today.

  1. Comparative essay on theme of Love in Romeo and Juliet and the Taming of ...

    stating: "'Tis deeds must win the prize, and he of both That can assure my daughter greatest dower Shall have Bianca's love" (II.i.342-44). Though at last Lucentio can marry Bianca, it is because Lucentio can offer the highest bid for her.

  2. "Compare Luhrmann's and Shakespeare's versions of the last scene- the death of Romeo and ...

    These above things showed that his version of the play was modern. There are many modern day machines in which Baz Luhrmann used these were 21st century technology. I mean equipment such as camera's, computers, cars, helicopters, guns, radios, and lights.

  1. Explore the ways that the audience is prepared for the

    negative, therefore the audience can see that the end of the play is likely to be negative.

  2. With reference to Romeo and Juliet what makes the play a tragedy?

    Usually, within a tragedy, when a character is introduced as being noble, the audience is aware that in the end of the play, the character will have a tragic fall. Another necessary quality possessed by a tragic hero is the hero's tragic flaw, which in Romeo's case is falling in love too quickly and deeply.

  1. Show how Romeo is changed by love and how the language of Shakespeare conveys ...

    He uses example of hyperbole, when he speaks of Juliet's beauty, but the language he uses, contains gratified speech, and he no longer speaks of how his feelings for Rosaline give him torture and affliction, but how Juliet is an asset to his life.

  2. Compare the way in which Luhrmann and Zeffirelli introduce the characters of Romeo and ...

    He aimed it mainly to bring the younger generation of people an understanding of Shakespeare and so modernised it so that it would appeal to the audiences of 1997. Even though there was a 30 year gap between the making of these films, they were both very successful and attracted mass audiences.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work