• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Are GB and the USA really two-party systems?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Are GB and the USA really two-party systems?

Marek Janovský                                                                         for Mr. Crowford

Introduction:

The USA and GB are by the majority of people and textbooks considered classical examples of two-party systems. Can we define this way? This paper’s task is to shed light on this statement, analyze the party systems of the mentioned countries and their background.

The paper will also pay attention to party system evolution and will make an attempt to clarify why the system operates the way it does and whether it is prone to be changed or not. Firstly, the discussion is going to concentrate on the USA stating some theoretical points and comments, secondly, Great Britain is going to be on the spotlight.

The USA:

The first country, whose party structure is going to be discussed is the USA. It is important to define the two-party system, to determine what such a system is based on.

A two party system is a competitive environment in which only two parties have any chance of accomplishing the basic goal of a political party: capturing control of government and nominating the presidential candidate. This clearly shows that what can be seen in the USA can be defined as a two-party system.  The reasons for this are numerous. Leaving

...read more.

Middle

Many state and federal election laws offer a clear advantage to the two major parties. In some states, the established major parties need to gather only a few signatures to place their candidates on the ballot, whereas a minor party or an independent candidate must get many more signatures. Surprisingly, in some states, it is easier to get a new party’s presidential candidate on the ballot than to put a full slate of candidates for  the House of Representatives on the ballot. For example, in Louisiana, no signatures are needed to put a presidential candidate on the ballot, but 125 000 signatures of registered party voters are needed to field an entire House slate. The criterion for making such a distinction is often based on the total party vote in the last general election, penalizing a new political party that did not compete in the election. At the national level, minor parties face different obstacles. All of the rules and procedures of both houses of Congress divide committee seats, staff members, and other privileges on the basis of party membership. So, a legislator elected on a minor-party ticket, such as the Liberal party of New York, must choose to be counted with one of the major parties to get a committee assignment. The Federal Election Commission in charge of campaign financing also places restrictions on minor-party candidates.

...read more.

Conclusion

Conclusion :( my part, you can add it with your part, or leave it out, as you like, or you can leave it here, at the end of my part, I do not care)

        Even though it may not seem that way, it is a tough call to define the US party system. I did not take into consideration the state levels, which would make the evaluation even more divers. I presented a few opinions and facts from which I draw this conclusion: Looking at the national level political party competition, I think there is a competitive two-party system inherent for the USA itself, having only two major players vying for the control of national government. Some countries exhibit what has been called an indistinct two-party system. In the USA political competition at practically all levels, federal, state and local, is between the Republican and Democratic parties. However, party structure differs in major respects from that found in Britain and many other liberal democracies. The two parties do not have distinct ideological differences and are as likely to show intra-party (internal) splits as inter-party ones

...read more.

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree Computer Science section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree Computer Science essays

  1. Information systems development literature review. Since the 1960s Methodologies, Frameworks, Approaches and CASE ...

    Each entity was created either with a Primary/foreign or composite key depending on the information stored. Where an entity attribute has been underlined this indicates this to be the primary key for the table. Where an astrix is present before the name of an attributes this identifies this to be a primary key from a related table.

  2. Crucial Changes in Regards to the Election of the President

    The Second most important change in how the President is elected is the shift from the Convention system to the Primary system. In 1828, Andrew Jackson implemented the convention system to elect the party nominee. This process was soon overrun by corruption, and primaries slowly worked their way into the nomination process, but it was in 1968 when everything changed.

  1. Evaluate the relative merits of the different electoral systems that operate in Britain, the ...

    As already discussed above FPTP has many merits. The system is seen as being fair, simple and efficient. PR-STV which is used for local assembly elections also has many merits. This system is seen as being very fair and strong.

  2. Evaluate the role of the Electoral College and explain why it has not been ...

    In 1992, Ross Perot won 18.9% of the popular vote, but won no ECV's. If the Electoral College was to be reformed in a representative way, he could have changed the result of that election, with Bill Clinton maybe not coming to power.

  1. Why was an Independent Commission on the Voting system set up?

    The commission was given a government remit, "...to recommend the best alternative 'system or combination of systems' to the existing...First Past the Post System of election to the Westminster Parliament"2 The Commission was required to review the existing voting system in Britain and report on how it could be reformed to meet the following criteria: i.

  2. The purpose of this project is to discuss the issues associated with the deployment ...

    Restricted power consumption Smaller displays Different input devices (e.g., a phone keypad, voice input, etc.) Because of these limitations, the user interface of a wireless handset is fundamentally different than that of a desktop computer. The limited screen size and lack of a mouse requires a different user interface metaphor than the traditional desktop GUI.

  1. In what ways does the present Electoral Law in Britain affect Voting Behaviour?

    "This effect can be seen in the 1992 General election where for each 42, 356 votes cast for it, the Conservative party won an MP, and for every 42, 875 votes cast for it, Labour won an MP. But it took the Liberal Democrats a massive 304,183 votes for every

  2. To what extent has the German electoral system shaped its party system and the ...

    and the Free Democratic Party (FDP). Since the CDU and CSU form one block in the Bundestag, they can often, although not always, be considered one party, with the CDU putting up no candidates for election in Bavaria, and the CSU putting up no candidates for election outside Bavaria.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work