"A digitally processed photograph can no longer be regarded as evidence of anything external itself." Discuss with reference to Jean Baudrillard and Simulcra.

Authors Avatar

“A digitally processed photograph can no longer be regarded as evidence of anything external itself.”  Discuss with reference to Jean Baudrillard and Simulcra.

We often here the statement “A camera never lies” in everyday conversation.  Although to a certain extent this could be considered because the image that is caught must have existed in one form or another, it is not always clear if images have been manipulated or not.

The faking of photographs has a long history scanning over a hundred of years, but the introduction of new technology has put photographic faking on a new level and photographs can now be edited with very little trouble at all.  

Digital images first came about in the late 1980’s from the emergence of personal computers.

During the last 10 years, the traditional mechanical and chemical process of photography has been overtaken by the introduction of digital cameras and scanners.

Join now!

The ability to digitally enhance and manipulate images is not particularly new.  Since the late 1980’s early 90’s professional graphic designers have been using expensive scanners, high end software and sophisticated imaging workstations.

However it is only recently that the power of digital imaging has been affordable and freshly available to the general public, due to the introduction of easy to use editing programs, the drop in price of digital cameras and the widespread use of personal computers.  This has also been coupled with the introduction of email and the World Wide Web which enable the photographs to ...

This is a preview of the whole essay