• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The purpose of this experiment was to demonstrate the uncertainty of experimental measurements. The free-fall times of two metal balls of varying weight were measured. This data was used to calculate the best estimate of these measurements and its consi

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Experiment 3: Motion with Constant Acceleration Physics 1100-ETR6B: Professor Viraht Sahni 09/13/2011 Emily Callejo, Max Vlasyuk, and Aleksandr Bukhbinder Objective The purpose of this experiment was to demonstrate the uncertainty of experimental measurements. The free-fall times of two metal balls of varying weight were measured. This data was used to calculate the best estimate of these measurements and its consistency. Then, the acceleration due to gravity was determined using the data obtained. Procedure The heavier metal ball was used first. It was placed in the release mechanism of the electronic free-fall timer apparatus. The receptor plate was placed right below the release mechanism and the release mechanism was placed on the stand so that the measured distance from the top of the receptor pad to the bottom of the ball was the specified length given, which was 90 centimeters. Once the timer was set to zero, the ball was released by loosening the thumb screw to start the timer; the timer ended when the ball hit the pad. ...read more.

Middle

. The percent error was calculated using experimental value attained from the graph as well. Data Table 1: Heavy Steal Ball Fall Time Trial # Time t(s) 1 0.4175 2 0.4335 3 0.4335 4 0.4212 5 0.4230 6 0.4355 7 0.4211 8 0.4215 9 0.4196 10 0.4181 11 0.4223 12 0.4409 13 0.4199 14 0.4236 15 0.4194 16 0.4172 17 0.4217 18 0.4252 19 0.4544 20 0.4193 Table 2: Heavy Ball Calculation Results Average Time (s) 0.43 Standard Deviation (s) 0.0096 Experimental Value of Free-Fall Time from 90 cm Distance (s) 0.43+0.0096=0.44 0.43-0.0096=0.42 Acceleration Due to Gravity (cm/s2) 997 1.63 Table 3: Heavy Ball # of Trials Vs. Time # of Trials Time t(s) 2 0.417 2 0.433 4 0.421 2 0.423 1 0.435 4 0.419 1 0.418 1 0.422 1 0.440 1 0.425 1 0.454 Table 4: Light Steal Ball Fall Time Trial # Time t(s) Average Time (s) ...read more.

Conclusion

because the larger the angle, the more it resembles a motion of a free-falling object, which falls perpendicularly from the horizontal. Conclusion The motion of a puck sliding down an inclined plane, without air resistance, resembles a free-falling object and should have had a 9.80 m/s2 acceleration due to gravity. However, there were possibly two dominant sources of error in this experiment: the table was not completely level, which may have effected the motion and the velocity of the puck, and there was a lot of glare from the sunlight in the video, which made it difficult to see the dot in the middle of the puck. Therefore, there was random error due to the inaccuracy of the cursor tracking of the image of the middle of the puck. These were the probable causes of error in the experimental results. It can be concluded that the force acting upon the puck undergoing a two-dimensional projectile motion is gravity and its motion can be described in two different components independently, its horizontal and vertical motions. ?? ?? ?? ?? Callejo, Vlasyuk, Bukhbinder 6 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree Physics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree Physics essays

  1. Acceleretion due to gravity

    The difference of the value of the acceleration due to gravity obtained from this experiment to the accepted value could be due to a number of reasons. One of the major reasons for this difference in values could be due to sideways movement of the pendulum.

  2. Fluid Flow In a Duct of Varying Cross-Section.

    venturi converges so that the cross-sectional area is at its minimum value. Graph One represents the change in static head (pressure difference) along the duct. From the continuity equation; smaller the area, greater the velocity of the flow and hence the greater the velocity, lower the pressure.

  1. Fluid flow in a duct of varying cross-section.

    8 24 460 40.5 123.5 0.01863 9 24 534 40.5 123.8 0.01863 10 24 607 40.5 123.9 0.01863 Specimen calculations; The velocity (v) was calculated from the continuity equation Q = v A , where A = the cross sectional area of the pipe.

  2. Can we have free will?

    Suppose the box is totally empty - a perfect vacuum. We then introduce one particle, as single oxygen molecule. We then close the divider. Which half is the oxygen in? We have a 50:50 chance of guessing the right answer.

  1. Projectile Motion

    The motion that acts vertically is the force of gravity, and this pulls an object towards the earth at 9.8 meters per second. But while gravity is pulling the object down, the projectile is also moving forward, horizontally at the same time.

  2. Using a Ballistic Pendulum To Demonstrate the Law Of Conservation of Momentum.

    sec 0.416 0.416 v0 cm/s 564.4 0.0 % Difference 13.0 Conclusion The concepts of conservation of momentum and conservation of mechanical energy were investigated and used to demonstrate that the law of conservation of momentum is valid. A ballistic pendulum was used to show that the initial velocity of the projectile could be determined using these concepts.

  1. How a standard Television works and what understanding of Physics was needed to develop ...

    = 21600000*1.6*10-19 = 3.456*10-12 Amps Phosphors Looking at a television set in a dark room I noticed something else. If the television set is on and then turned off, the screen glows faintly and a vague outline of the last image remains.

  2. Acceleration of a Freely Falling Object

    s 0.4070 s2 1.80 m 0.6050 s 0.6050 s 0.6047 s 0.6045 s 0.6043 s 0.6047 s 0.3657 s2 1.60 m 0.5706 s 0.5707 s 0.5710 s 0.5708 s 0.5708 s 0.5708 s

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work