• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Business Ethics. The case The Harry Potter Lexicon is about a legal dispute between Steve Vander Ark and J.K. Rowling, the author of the Harry Potter book series. Steve Vander Ark created the Harry Potter Lexicon which is basically an onlin

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

CaSarah Severs Business ethics Paper #1 September 13, 2011 "The Harry Potter Lexicon" INTORDUCTION The case "The Harry Potter Lexicon" is about a legal dispute between Steve Vander Ark and J.K. Rowling, the author of the Harry Potter book series. Steve Vander Ark created the Harry Potter Lexicon which is basically an online summary of what happens in the book series. The case references Wikipedia which states that the Lexicon lists "characters, places, creatures, spells, potions, and magical devices." When the Lexicon was first created Rowling had no problem with it, in fact she thought it was a wonderful idea and even referenced the site on several occasions. However when RDR books offered Vander Ark a publishing contract to put out a printed version of the Lexicon, Rowling along with Warner Bros., the producers of the Harry Potter movies, filed a suit against Vander Ark and RDR Books. Rowling is against the publishing of the book because she doesn't want Vander Ark and RDR to succeed financially from her hard work. ...read more.

Middle

The decision of whether or not to consider self-interest is s moral dilemma the judge will need to overcome. STAKEHOLDERS There are a number of stakeholders involved in this lawsuit including Steve Vander Ark, RDR Books, J.K. Rowling, the federal judge, and the general public. Depending on the outcome of the lawsuit Vander Ark and RDR Books could be affected financially; they could lose the possibility to make a large sum of money. In winning the case they would be able to publish and sell the book with the potential to make huge financial gains. In losing the case they will not be able to publish the book and therefore will lose that opportunity to sell the book. The lawsuit and its outcome could also affect the reputations of RDR Books and the judge. When it comes to RDR Books their reputation could be damaged through publicity. If they lose the case many authors could view it as bad publicity for RDR Books and therefore not want their name associated with the publishing company. ...read more.

Conclusion

I also want to point out that although Warner Bros. is involved in the lawsuit I don't think they are stakeholders. I don't think that the outcome of this situation will directly affect them in any way. SOLUTIONS One solution for this case is for the judge to rule in favor of Steve Vander Ark and RDR Books allowing them to publish the Harry Potter Lexicon as a book without it being copyright infringement. Another solution is to rule in favor of Vander Ark and RDR Books allowing them to publish the book but requiring that a portion of the profits made be paid to Rowling. A third solution, the exact opposite of the first, is to rule in favor of Rowling and Warner Bros and not allow the book to be published and have it remain as an internet web site only. A fourth solution, similar to the last, is to rule in favor of Rowling and Warner Bros by not allowing the book to be published but also making Vander Ark take down the internet site by concluding that the Lexicon, in its entirety, is copyright infringement. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Case Studies and Analysis section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Case Studies and Analysis essays

  1. Proctor & Gamble, Inc. (Scope Case)

    Also, to get the approval for reducing gum inflammation and fighting gingivitis, especially for the CDA, Scope has to submit their packaging and advertising for approval to the HPB. They also require products to demonstrate effectiveness against cavities or plaque/gingivitis .

  2. Social implications of business ethics. The main areas I will be highlighting are ...

    'Aeneas Enterprises, judging by its bank records, the small consulting company with no listed telephone number was an instant success. Within a month, its records show, Aeneas had taken in $2.3 million from a single client. Its founder, Robert Abramoff, a lawyer is the brother of Jack Abramoff, the lobbyist

  1. PEST is a planning tool which is used by a business to evaluate and ...

    such as lorries, this is because they will be travelling less distance this means things such as there tyres will take less time to wear down. This will affect their aim to maximise profit as they will not have to pay out as much money for these aspects so they will have increased profit left over in the business.

  2. Identify and describe a selected case significant stakeholder influence over a business. (P2)

    They opened their first store in the UK in 1929 in Burnt Oak which is located in Edgware in North London. They then became a private limited company in 1932. Tesco kept growing into new markets and countries. Tesco launched their new clothing range in 2001 - Florence and Fred.

  1. Unit 12 - International Dimensions of Business Task 1

    This is why it would not be clever for a new let's say Romanian cigarette brand to expand to Holland or the UK because it is completely pointless to work in nations were demand of your product is falling and it would most likely be more effective to companies to

  2. Assignment 1 - Understand the legal requirements for a valid contract

    Therefore the car could not be considered as an item that belongs to Elliot. Even though her writing in her diary ?8th July-Ring Elliot at 8pm to agree car sale. Is intention to create legal relations, but no-one knows about it so technically it does not apply.

  1. Nestle stakeholders and business environment

    As a food and beverage enterprise, the responsibility to ensure quality of its products is vital and the key factor of its existence. Nestlé’s commitment is never to compromise on the safety of any product. It is Nestlé’s responsible to implement their commitment of “Good food, good life”.

  2. I will be identifying the legal criteria for offer and acceptance in a valid ...

    It?s not easily decided and is usually found very difficult determining which terms are chosen and sometimes there might not be a valid contract at all due to the conflicts that arise. Modern approaches today in courts take the most recent counter-offer as the one being accepted by the offeror,

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work