• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Many Economists and managerial Scientists in our days question that the sole aim of a firm is the maximisation of profits.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

"The increased rate of merger activity both nationally and internationally suggests that many enterprises will adopt a multi-divisional internal structure. The implication of this divisionalisation must be that modern business firms are more likely to adopt goal pursuits and least cost behaviour associated with the neo-classical profit maximisation hypothesis." Many would make the basic assumption that firms are in business for a simple reason: To make money. Traditional economic theory suggests that firms make their decisions on supply and output on the basis of profit maximisation. However many Economists and managerial Scientists in our days question that the sole aim of a firm is the maximisation of profits. These economists suggest that there are a number of other objectives that are important to a business. Personal motives may be important, especially where the manager is also the owner of the firm. In this case emphasis may be placed on good employee relations and the welfare of the workers. Divorce of ownership from control in modern day businesses has challenged the traditional theory of economists that profit maximisation is the main objective. Many businesses, especially those involved in merger activity are beginning to move away from the traditional U (unitary) ...read more.

Middle

There are many alternative to the neo-classical profit maximisation theory that challenges their ideas. Sales Revenue Maximisation is one of these alternatives. This objective was initially developed by the work of Baumol (1959). Baumol's research focused on the behaviour of manager-controlled businesses - where the day-to-day decisions taken by managers are divorced from the shareholders (the owners of the business). Baumol argued that annual salaries and other perks might be more closely correlated with total sales revenue rather than profits. It could be argued that if your sales are maximised then your revenue is likely to rise at a faster rate than your costs (as you can exploit economies of scale more) and the end result of this is likely to be an increase in profits. Another alternative view was put forward by Williamson (1963), who built a model based on the concept of managerial satisfaction (utility). This model is similar to Baumol's sales revenue maximisation in the sense that managers try to maximise their own utility subject to some profit constraint. Managerial utility includes high salaries, perks, status, and power and job security. These factors provide the basis for managers to spend money on staff. ...read more.

Conclusion

As we have seen most of the short-term objectives such as sales revenue maximisation, are very important short-term objectives but tend to inevitably lead to higher profits in the long term. With multi divisional organisations it is easier for the executives to aim for profit maximisation as they entrust the day to day running to the separate departments who are responsible for the main decisions whilst being advised by the top level management. To conclude I would accept that although business have shorter term objectives and are working within constraints which may threaten maximisation theories, it is clear that very few business would continue to operate with no profits. Firms can enjoy the incentive of higher profits if they can attract sufficient consumers to buy their products, and so I would accept that as short-term objectives those such as sales maximisation cannot be ignored. However the traditional neo-classical approach of profit maximisation seems to be the underpinning of almost every organisation regardless of size or status. Having said that I feel that it would be unwise of businesses to completely disregard the behavioural model as its foundations are built on achieving realistic results in a firm, as so it should be seen as a useful complement to the maximisation theories rather than as a substitute for them. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Structures, Objectives & External Influences section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Structures, Objectives & External Influences essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    ASDA's Ownership

    4 star(s)

    The staff as stakeholders didn't like the idea of being taken over by an American company as they knew new rules and regulations were going to be introduced and new rates of pay was going to be introduced. This meant, they were going to loose their overtime pay, Sunday pay, lieu days and double pay for bank holidays.

  2. The Business Environment Coursework. Describe the type of business, purpose and ownership of ...

    Different countries also have different work attitudes, for example in Britain we have a 'long hours culture' compared to many other European countries such as France and Italy, however hours worked in Britain are lower than in many South East Asian countries.

  1. Btec National Business Level 3 Year 1 - Exploring Business Activity

    Pressure group: They are seeking to exert the pressure on business decision making. E.g. pressure groups are Greenpeace and friends of the Earth that see themselves as defending the environment. They will try to press environmental concerns on to the business.

  2. Differentiate between strategic planning and operational planning.

    Slow and limited growth. I would suggest that Mary's Fashion would benefit and gain more if the business ownership is change to a Private Limited company. Structure of a Private limited company 1. Minimum 2 to maximum of 50 shareholders.

  1. Introduction to J Sainsbury plc

    & Trevitt, R. Business for Vocational A Level 3rd Edition. Stanley Thornes Publishers Ltd. 2000) The diagram has many advantages. It gives a quick and simple way of gaining a mental map of Sainsbury's organisational structure. It is based on the main managerial functions and is controlled from the top layer of senior management.

  2. Business report on J Sainsbury's.

    Retail staff have access to Learning@Sainsbury's, via the Sainsbury's intranet, which is helping to grow talent within the business, providing help and training when needed. It covers four faculties: 1. Management capabilities; 2. Customer service and selling skills; 3. Operating standards; 4.

  1. Business Objectives.

    efficiently as possible and they use the resources carefully, not only considering the environment as they'll run out one day but also to ensure no money is wasted where it isn't necessary. Conclusion: Considering all the points carefully, I came to a judgement that many of the points are in relation to each other.

  2. Investigating Business. Tesco PLC. I will be describing the aims and objectives of ...

    Work level 3 is about running an operating unit. Requires management skills, including planning, target setting and reporting. Work level 4 is about supporting operating units and recommending strategic change. Requires good knowledge of the business, the skills to analyse information and to make decisions, and the ability to lead others.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work