• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. 9
  10. 10
  11. 11
  12. 12
  13. 13
  14. 14
  15. 15

By the mid nineteenth century, Britain had been the world's strongest economic power for nearly a century. It was the first industrialised nation and was hailed as the 'workshop of the world'.

Extracts from this document...


By the mid nineteenth century, Britain had been the world's strongest economic power for nearly a century. It was the first industrialised nation and was hailed as the 'workshop of the world'. In 1850, Britain was supplying more than 60 per cent of the world's coal, half the world's cotton goods, half its iron, and nearly three-quarters of its steel. Britain's staple industries were in fact accounting for 40 percent of the world's manufactured goods. However, in the last quarter of the century, although the industrial output was still increasing as well as the GDP, this once huge economic lead over all the other countries was rapidly being lost. By the onset of the First World War (1914-1918), the USA and Germany had overtaken Britain's manufacturing output in several key industries (see Table 1.1 - 1.3). Table 1.1: Coal Production (million tonnes) 1850 1860 1870 1880 1890 1900 1910 Germany 6 12 34 59 89 149 222 USA 3.4 10 64.9 143 244 350 Britain 57 81 112 149 184 228 268 Table 1.2: Pig Iron Production (million tonnes) 1850 1860 1870 1880 1890 1900 1910 Germany 1.3 2.5 4.1 7.5 9.5 USA 0.8 1.7 3.9 9.4 14 27 Britain 2.2 3.9 6 7.8 8 9 10 Table 1.3: Steel Production (million tonnes) 1850 1860 1870 1880 1890 1900 1910 Germany 0.3 0.7 2.3 6.7 13.8 USA 1.3 4.3 10 26 Britain 0.7 1.3 3.6 5 5.9 Source: AJP Taylor The Struggle For Master in Europe 1848-1918, 1971, pp.29-30 The obvious question to ask is what had gone wrong. There has been no shortage of answers from historians to explain the relative decline of Britain's economic performance. The lack of tariff protection for British industries, a shortage of capital, the seeming inability to modernise industry, a lack of skilled technicians, scientists and entrepreneurs, are amongst the plethora of explanations. The most frequent explanation given for this relative decline and the subject of ongoing controversy was the apparent weakness in British entrepreneurship, as Burnham and Hoskins concluded from their study of the iron and steel industry in 1902. ...read more.


Lars G. Sandberg went even further in his defence of the entrepreneur. In 1969, Sandberg published his article, 'American Rings and English Mules: The Role of Economic Rationality', in the Quarterly Journal of Economics. Whereas, Wilson had used newer industries to counter the failure hypothesis, Sandberg went directly against the Aldcroft and Landes view using the cotton industry as an example of entrepreneurial efficiency. In the slow adoption of the ring spindle over the much slower and less efficient spinning mules, Sandberg concluded that this was not indicative of 'technological conservatism', but was instead the 'rational' response of British industrialists to the various factor costs, and the availability of a skilled workforce making the innovation unnecessary at that time.18 This was still the case in the 1930s when almost seventy-five percent of Lancashire's cotton yarn was still being produced on mules.19 What was so unique about Sandberg's theory, was not so much his results, but more the method he used to get them. His undertaking of a formal cost-benefit analysis, was the start of a wave of quantitative assessments, the most famous of these being the work of Donald N. McCloskey. Not only does McCloskey feel he has redeemed the performance of the British entrepreneur, but in his article 'Did Victorian Britain Fail?', published in 1970, McCloskey also arrived at a favourable conclusion of Britain's economic performance in the 1870-1914 period. Unlike the pessimistic image portrayed in the findings of Landes and Aldcroft, McCloskey views the late Victorian period as "a picture of an economy not stagnating but growing as rapidly as permitted by the growth of its resources and the effective exploitation of the available technology".20 McCloskey argued that there was no break in trend in British industrial production and real product growth, especially on a cyclical basis, till 1913. He reached this conclusion by measuring the aggregate output of the economy as a whole, and then he gauged how efficiently Britain utilised the available techniques and resources. ...read more.


we continue to accept generalised explanations about characteristics which, in so far as they amounted to 'short-comings' or even 'failure', were so variously distributed?".37 The work of Landes and Aldcroft, stressed the fall in entrepreneurial performance, offering examples, showing what they believe implicitly to be illustrative of poor industrial leadership and management. The main focus of their theories, being the poor response of British businessmen in adopting the latest techniques and machinery. However, by using the same statistical indicators, historians such as Charles Wilson, S.B. Saul were quick to dispute the claims of Landes and Aldcroft, by showing examples of industries that were more productive and profitable than their American and German counterparts. The quantitative assessments of McCloskey, Sandberg and Floud have opened the debate up to further controversial discussion. Although there work is of equal and perhaps greater merit than the early hypothesis of entrepreneurial failure, it is by no way fully conclusive. Ultimately any judgement made on the performance of British entrepreneurs or on the decline of British industrial performance is dependent upon the historian's choice of performance indicators. Entrepreneurial activity as this essay has shown, is not a factor in itself to explain the relative decline of the economy or the comparatively poor performance of British industrial production. It is difficult to ascertain whether an entrepreneur's aims and goals are going to be those that prove to be the best thing for the national economy. There clearly was not a typical Victorian entrepreneur, some were disappointing, particularly in the older staple industries, but they were not characteristic of the period as a whole. Successes could also be found in the newer industries and within the service industry, but again, this is not characteristic either. There are also regional disparities where cases of entrepreneurial endeavour and failure can be seen. At this moment in time there is simply not enough statistical evidence or enough detailed case studies to either be able to condemn the late Victorian and Edwardian entrepreneur, or redeem him. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level UK, European & Global Economics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level UK, European & Global Economics essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    International Business Strategy - Case Study on Unilever

    4 star(s)

    Global businesses often operate at one of the four basic levels of globalization: Multidomestic - the first level of globalization. Businesses at this level consist of several independent units that operate in various countries, where communication between these units are minimal.

  2. A study of Patent system in India in the light of Patent Cooperation Treaty.

    The PCT offers applicant upto 18 months more time then they would have the traditional patent system to decide whether and for which countries they wish to pursue patent protection18. One more advantage for developing countries to file the application through PCT is that PCT give the option to the inventors to file the patent in other countries.

  1. Why was Britain the First Industrial Nation?

    This population increase was mainly in the middle and working class people, probably due to the rising medical knowledge, and the fact that more hospitals were set up, consequently decreasing the death rate. Many historians argue that when the population began to expand, after 1750 it provided the critical ingredient necessary to trigger off industrialisation.

  2. 'Critically assess the role of the World Trade Organisation (WTO) as a means of ...

    was presented by developed countries as a necessary condition to promote innovation and to stimulate technology and capital flows to developing countries...the assumption was that people from developed and developing countries will benefit alike from IPRs...it remains unproven, however, that reinforced and expanded protection of IPRs worldwide shall increase the

  1. International entrepreneurship in Europe

    benefits of European countries, and it also gives some critical analysis about nowadays Europe international marketing. 2.2 Wright, R. W., & Ricks, D. A. (1994). Trends in International Business Research: Twenty-five years later. International Business Studies, 25(4): pp.687-701. The authors highlighted international entrepreneurship as a newly emerging research direction, and

  2. Robert Keohane and Joseph Nye have described international relations as exhibiting 'complex interdependence'. What ...

    can result in the dispute being solved. It can also be said that the increasingly rapid expansion of non-state actors acted as a catalyst for the broadening of linkages between states on various levels. Previously inter-governmental relations had been conducted through designated channels.

  1. What are the main determinants of industrial location?

    Another factor outlined includes the dispersion forces: As production concentrates, the price of immobile factors will rise relative to locations where production does not take place. Agglomeration and dispersion forces decide where firms locate (Fujita, Krugman and Venables, 1999). Trade barriers will affect both trade costs and to a degree the mobility of labour.

  2. The value of world trade has been growing at a faster rate than world ...

    Although this may previously have been a particularly significant disadvantage to the UK in the past, when manufacturing played a big part in the UK's economy, it is now less so. The UK is currently a country dominated by tertiary sector employment, with 81% of all jobs classified as tertiary.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work