• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Differences between monopoly and monopolistic market competition.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

DIFFERENCES BETWEEN MONOPOLISTIC COMPETITON AND MONOPOLY MARKET STRUCTURE Monopolistic competition and monopoly are two market structures existing on rather two extremities of the market structure analysis. In this essay I will give their definitions, discussing their characteristics, giving their differences and concluding with an overview of what I have been able to achieve. Amos WEB (2000-2010) defines Monopolistic competition as a market structure in which a large number of firms manufacture and produce not necessarily the same product but similar products but still maintain a substantial amount of profit. For example, the manufacturing of pens, firms manufacturing these can be said to exist in a monopolistic competition market where four or more firms manufacture the same product or similar products in this case pens. There is freedom of entry and exit and extensive knowledge of prices and technology. The diagram above represents monopoly competition. It has four characteristics, which are: 1. Large number of small firms: This market contains large numbers of comparatively small firms when compared to the size of the market. This gives for high rate of competition and little control over price or quantity. ...read more.

Middle

2. Restrictions of entry into and exit out of this industry: entry and exit into and out of this market is restricted by either legal or natural causes. 3. One unique product: the product being produced is unique and has no close substitutes or competition. 4. Information is not easily accessible: this is not available to other prospective producers as product is unique and there are barriers to entry and exit. This two market systems are very different and there differences are: 1. There exists only one producer of a unique product in monopoly while in monopolistic competition there can be hundreds of producers producing the same or closely similar products or services. In monopoly one particular firm makes 100% of the markets profit while profit has to be shared among many firms in monopolistic competition. 2. In the short run, firms in a monopolistic competition market can behave like monopolized firms, but in the long run other firms are introduced into the market and it becomes similar to perfect competition but does not shut down or loose profit completely as it maintains spare capacity. ...read more.

Conclusion

7. In the short run, firms in monopolistic market can make excess profit but this reduces as the excess profit attracts other firms and is finally reduced to its barest minimum. While a monopoly firm can preserve excess profit for a long time as barriers to entry prevent other firms from entering into the industry. The diagram above represents monopolistic competition in the short run and long run. 8. A monopoly firm would have a relatively inelastic demand curve, while a monopolistic competition firm would have a perfectly elastic demand curve. 9. In monopoly there is no pricing pressure from other competitive firms unlike the monopolistic competition that faces pricing pressure due to the numerous numbers of firms in this market structure. Pricing pressure is if the price of a good should affect another negatively or positively. In conclusion, there exist a lot of differences between monopolistic competition and monopoly, although this firms have similarities, their differences are said to outweigh them. In this essay I have discussed and defined the meanings of monopoly and monopolistic competition and diagrams that help us understand this market structures, given its characteristics and also its differences. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Markets & Managing the Economy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Markets & Managing the Economy essays

  1. "Discuss and evaluate the proposition that perfect competition is a more efficient market structure ...

    Examples of this are local public utilities such as telephone, gas water and electric power. Also it is sometimes cheaper to produce two related products in a single firm rather than in two separate firms. This are called Economies of scope.

  2. Free essay

    Pay differences between men and women

    paid a higher rate in such positions than the market rate and thus their overall pay increases closer to the average male pay.

  1. In this essay, I would like to take a view at the implications for ...

    Only when price equals marginal cost, the level of production is right. (Sloman, 2001, p126) Firstly, it is only in perfect competition that price equals marginal cost, so it is said that allocative efficiency can only be achieved in perfect competition.

  2. Monopoly. The following is going to discuss that monopoly is always against the ...

    whereas referring to figure1 and 4, in the equilibrium of perfect competition producing is at its lowest point of AC curve; it is therefore productively efficient. However, deadweight loss can be removed by used of 'price discrimination' which means charging different prices for different unit of the same good or service, e.g.

  1. What are the implications for economic welfare of a market structure changing from perfect ...

    The other part of deadweight loss (triangle GFB) is the loss of producer surplus. Because there is less output under monopoly. Obviously, monopoly is inefficient. The total surplus (economic welfare) is smaller under monopoly than under perfect competition. There is a deadweight loss to society when market structure changing from perfect competition to monopoly.

  2. In this essay, I will analyze and compare the two extremes of market structure ...

    The firm can set price for its products. However, monopoly firms cannot whatever price they like, they can only charge the maximum price that the consumer is willing to pay There are three conditions that give rise to a situation in which one seller or one firm is able to

  1. 'Although corporate pricing decisions are influenced by many different factors, fundamentally prices will reflect ...

    In other words, competitors are faced with barriers to entry. * Patents A patent is issued to an inventor to protect him or her from having the invention copied for a period of years. At the end of the patent period the patented invention is no longer private property but public property which anyone can copy or reproduce.

  2. What Are The Effects Of Tescos Oligopolistic Market Structure, On Both Consumers And Producers?

    corporations can threaten retailers, suppliers, and regulators far more effectively than little ones. Like many economists, he presents an ideal market that exists independent of politics and power. Because firms in an oligopoly characteristically charge above-equilibrium (i.e., high prices) the only way to compete is through product differentiation.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work