• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How does Shakespeare present Edmund in King Lear?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

How does Shakespeare present Edmund in King Lear? King Lear is a play about child - parent relationships, nature, Christianity and enlightenment. King Lear initiates with a King dividing up his land and bestowing it upon his three daughters. After being betrayed by his youngest born Cordelia, Lear banishes her and starts his struggle with madness. King Lear is a tragic play and ends with many characters dying after a bloody war. Shakespeare touched on many themes when creating his masterpiece and all of these can be voiced through Edmund which makes him an integral character to the play. Edmund is the illegitimate son of the Duke of Gloucester. He is one of the first characters mentioned in the play, and throughout the play he seems to be the personification of evil. The mendacious bastard betrays his brother and father before dying with little remorse. Shakespeare used a variety of literary techniques to convey his message about Edmund and used the villain as a pawn in the story about Good vs. Evil. Edmund is a godless character; he embraces the concept of humanism and refuses to answer to any divine being when he stresses "thou nature art my goddess" he instantly dismisses the notion of an abrahamic God. To be an atheist was still seen as "satanic" so for Shakespeare to present Edmund as faithless, it reasserts this notion of malevolence. ...read more.

Middle

This is a prime example of how Edmund is usually only talking to one person in a secretive manner. This secrecy simply emphasises his slyness and deceptiveness. The fact that he never appears publicly also brings his sociability into question. It's obvious that Edmund is disgusted by his company therefore is rarely seen with them. Edmund's language in King Lear is very unique, unlike his counterparts he refrains from long speeches about inconsequential subjects, instead he uses very sharp poignant language. Edmund's speech similar to any nobility in the play is very formal. Similar to the speech of Goneril and Regan when they eulogised their father at the beginning of the play, Edmund through his dialogue shows much respect. When answering his father he always attaches "my lord" this could be interpreted as sarcastic. He in no way respects his father but despises him, therefore by adding the lord he lulls him into a false sense of security and it also adds comical effect. Edmund continues to show the utmost respect and shock in light of his brother's supposed treachery" I hope his heart is not/in the contents." This politeness and fa´┐Żade of naivety is very frustrating to the audience as we all know he was the conspirator behind his brother's demise. Edmund's speech is also littered with negativities. ...read more.

Conclusion

Also if we look at the background of Edmund it's no surprise he turned out to be such an individualist, the neglect of his father and the condescending manner of society meant Edmund had to go it alone. Instead of criticising Edmund really the audience should be criticising the society that forced in into a life of intolerance, greed and isolation. Despite apparent vindication for Edmund's actions I feel Shakespeare's overall presentation of Edmund is one of a malevolent Machiavellian. He possesses no traits of the angelic Cordelia, however is more like her vicious sisters Regan and Goneril. It was Shakespearian custom to have a out and out villain and Edmund adopts this role flawlessly. By using an array of literary techniques ranging from language to role Shakespeare has created a monster, someone who has no qualms with the murder or betrayal. Edmund is not someone who commits evil acts however manipulates others to do his dirty work. By doing this Shakespeare has made Edmund even more hated, he has not battled for power however stolen it through deceptiveness and deceit. Edmund was a Darwinist who loved a challenge and had a voracious attitude to life. Like A. Wilkinson said in his essay which explored Saints and Sinners in King Lear, Edmund "possesses a deep and black nature which is opposed to all things of beauty and light". Edmund is the personification of evil in King Lear and is a hero of darkness. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level King Lear section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level King Lear essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    How effectively does Shakespeare present Lear's loss of power in the play?

    4 star(s)

    Lear is not used to this treatment and his shock comes through in the line "Deny to speak with me?". He tries to find excuses for his daughter and her husband as though he cannot quite believe that anyone would willingly ignore him.

  2. Marked by a teacher

    The influence Act 1 has on the rest of the play in King Lear

    3 star(s)

    many people around him have noticed his naivety, such as Kent 'See better, Lear, and let me still remain the true blank of thine eye' and may, in the future take advantage of this as much as possible.

  1. Comparing and contrasting both the characters of Edmund and Edgar In king Lear.

    Edgar runs to the woods and hides out there. (III.4.119-120) Lear, Kent and the fool meet Edgar disguised as "Poor Tom" a madman and beggar. Edgar is also naked. He has gone back to nature, naked with flowers in his hair, noble, Christ like.

  2. Explore the presentation of Edmund in 'King Lear'

    The first scene introduces all the major characters except Edgar and the Fool and hinges upon the conflict of wills from which the plot develops. Kent and Gloucester reveal that this is a time a flux, with the future of the country uncertain.

  1. To What Extent Can King Lear Be Described as the Tragic Hero of Shakespeares ...

    let Lear keep fifty of his knights while Regan wanted to reduce the number further to 25: 'Thy fifty yet doth double her five and twenty, And thou art twice her love.' He still believes that what they are prepared to give him reflects the strength of their love; Just

  2. With particular reference to Act 1, Scene 1, show how Shakespeare presents the character ...

    been genuine, and that she was right in saying that she wasn't going to cave in and recite an inauthentic speech. It also shows that Cordelia does not want to dignify herself to such a pathetic game, but to show that she is not being rude and that she does love him, she adds "my Lord".

  1. Edmund's soliloquy in Act 1 scene ii reveals his plot to supplant and gain ...

    will power to do whatever he needs to to reach his goals. He completely rejects the natural order and hierarchy believed in by Lear and asserts the time is ripe for a new power to take over, a view shared by Gonerill and Regan.

  2. How does Shakespeare create a sense of unease in Act 1 Scene 1 of ...

    The sudden switch in language and ensuing disrespect towards a figure of comparative all-powerfulness is significant in displaying the general dissonance within the palace, and opening scene. Suspense and tension slowly builds during Lear?s defence of Cordelia (Lear?s stern warnings of ?The bow is bent? and ?On thy life, no more?), comes to a climax upon Kent?s banishment.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work