Brutus is the tragic hero of the play, because of his idealistic and pragmatic qualities. The mindset that Brutus possessed only allowed him to see the world and its people from one point of view. This point of view allowed him to make judgments that assumed only the best of people. This tragic weakness resulted in many errors throughout the play. The major incidences such as decisions made during the orchard soliloquy, the discussion with Cassius and the conspirators regarding decisions about Antony and the oath, his speech to the commoners after Caesar's assassination and finally the outward circumstance regarding Titinius and Cassius in act 5. Brutus was too idealistic and lived in a fantasy world in which he made all his decisions simply by expecting that all were as honourable as him.
Brutus' idealism was displayed when he was reviewing his decision to kill Caesar while in his orchard. While evaluating his feelings towards Caesar, he stated, “I know little personal cause to spurn at him, But for the general". Brutus felt that Caesar had not done anything incorrect, but was afraid of what might occur. He compared Caesar to a snake, which has the ability to sting. Just as one might step on the snake and be stung, Caesar might defeat anyone who interfered with his course of action.
The use of language in the play is varied throughout traumatic stages, as the play is interpreted as a wide meaning of deceit and death, and almost anything variably understandable to the evil eye, it was almost certainly depicted in this play.
Shakespeare, had a manner as to creating the imaginative speech, but instead of the basic formatted approach, it contains an utmost unusual direction into greed, love honour, pride and most definitely justice.
A prime example of greed is in Act 4: Scene 3; lines 1-28, the fear of speech, is portrayed in betrayal and greed, where Cassius wants more than he can have.
A conscious example of love is in Act 4: Scene 3; lines 152-160, this is the grievance of love, Brutus shares his despair and loss, and yet this seems to persuade the audience into feeling sorry for him, therefore turning his justice into him becoming a tragic hero.
A defiant illustration of honour is indeed a case in Act 5: Scene 3; lines 33-46, There is an impact of betrayal into the suicide assistance, there is also a undignified blackmail forced easily onto the servant, Pindarus, helping assist into the suicide, which of course he took the opportunity extremely easily, as this meant freedom, and quick escape from the invasion. Even though Brutus blackmailed Pindarus to take his life, this was a circumstance of which was taken extraordinarily differently, of course it took the audience by surprise, but the audience felt, the pain, sorrow, and the anguish of all that he had lost, had for some mishaps made him into a peculiar, tragic hero.
In Act 2: Scene 1; line 327, where Brutus quotes ‘A piece of work that will make sick men whole’, this is the speech, profoundly indulging into the men of admiral, healthy Rome. Brutus is exploiting Caesar, and trying to drag him down to go to another level.
Brutus may have made many mistakes before and after the death of Caesar, but he certainly didn’t make one whilst at the funeral. Brutus managed to alliterate an amazing, testifying speech, at no cost, and personifying it perfectly, just the way he wished he had altered many values of conspiracies.
At the time Shakespeare had written Julius Caesar, it had coincidently clashed within the period of the renaissance, it’s also referred to as the classical age. Its agricultural economy and Church-dominated intellectual and cultural life, was transformed into a society increasingly dominated by central political institutions, (Shakespeare has smeared this issue of politics into his play with it being at this time). At this time in life, politics was a very big issue, and the Roman law was introduced, (yet another reason why Shakespeare confirmed these issues into his play- basically anything that was involved with daily life at the time was revolving around through the play) and there was also a great divide of the people who abided to these rules, and the challenging, but not overthrowing, persevering renaissance theorists could cause collateral damage of it was needed, so conspirators at the time were possibly thought of around the country.
Many people at the time were also originating there background from a source of the Romans/the Roman Empire.
The play is based around greed, and getting too much of it- but the existence in this play is sympathetic- towards not Caesar, but to Brutus, this is why the play is so wisely positioned as to who the audience feels sorry for, yet the person you most probably shouldn’t this converts him not as a hero but foe.
The surprising, or to many, the least surprising effect as to the result in the end of the play, lead to the state of affairs within Brutus coinciding into assisted suicide, in the absence of the betrayal, deceit and all anger, Brutus was some how was revealed and appeared to be a major tragic hero, not through the whole play, but assumed a hero towards the end. This stated a finalisation to persuade the audience to think it that way.
