• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Is source a more reliable than source b for a study of the Effect of artillery in WW1?

Extracts from this document...


Is source a more reliable than source b for a study of the Effect of artillery in WW1? I have found, by using various sources that artillery wasn't very effective in WW1. In many sources the artillery had not broken the barbed wire and when the soldiers had to go over the top they couldn't get past the barbed wire and the German machine guns cut them to ribbons. Craig mare says this and I think that his source is unbiased as it was after the war and he made it for history students so it is unlikely to be biased. Jack cousins agrees with source an as he says the wire was untouched by the artillery. Liddle hart also agrees and he says that defence was slack and the Germans performed drills. AJP Taylor says that the guns were useless and could not penetrate Germans dug out. Russell says that it was useless, as the fence had not been touched. Agreeing with source B field Marshall Haig said the nation must bear the losses, as we cannot win without a few deaths was written before battle. Agreeing with source B 'spirits are high' he also says that 'the barbed wire was cut'. Private George Coppard Agrees with source A, hundreds were dead and there was no gap in the fence and the artillery makes it worse. I think that A is more reliable as there is more evidence to support it and we know why it was made. ...read more.


In November 1917 he was passed fit for General Service and returned to the Regimental Depot, from whence in January 1918, he was posted to Limerick. In February 1918, Sassoon was posted to Palestine with the 25th Battalion of the Royal Welch Fusiliers. After three months in Palestine the Battalion was posted to France and Sassoon eventually found himself in the Front Line near Mercatel. From there he moved to St. Hilaire and the Front Line at St. Floris where his old foolhardiness took over, despite the responsibility of being a Company Commander. Sassoon decided to attack the German trenches opposite them, and he went out with a young Corporal. His actions were paid for with a wound to his head on July 13, 1918, and Sassoon was invalided back to England. That was the end of Sassoon's War. After a period of convalescence he was placed on indefinite sick leave until after the Armistice, eventually retiring officially from the Army in March 1919. Much of Sassoon's poetry written during the War was epigrammatic and satirical in nature. Several poems, particularly those in Counter-Attack and Other Poems are aimed at those on the Home Front. Sassoon used his poems to hit out at those at Home whom he considered to be making a profit out of the War, or those whom he felt were helping to prolong the War. Only a few of his poems were actually about the generals and other senior officers - the two best known of these being Base Details and The General. ...read more.


Another major problem was rat infestation; a pair of rats can produce 880 offspring in a year and even clean and dry trenches were infested, "There are millions! Some are huge fellows nearly as big as cats. Several of our men were awakened to find a rat snuggling down under the blankets alongside them." Soldiers were theoretically well fed; this is an actual list of how much they ate per day, List of rations: 1 man per day Meat (bully beef) 1 LB Bread (or biscuits) 1 1/4 LB Bacon 1/4 LB Tea 1/2 oz Sugar 2 oz Jam 2 oz Cheese 1 oz Butter 3/4 oz Potatoes 3/4 LB Salt 1 oz Pepper 1/36 oz Mustard 1/20 oz Although cooking was difficult due to a limited supply of utensils. The only evidence that suggests that the source is right is from generals who had never been on the front line and didn't actually know what the conditions were like; these generals spent their time making plans hundreds of kilometres away in nice houses with all the comfort they wanted. This makes their ideas biased, as they have had no experience of life in the trenches. I therefore conclude that the source is wrong and that life in the trenches was far worse than the source depicts as the evidence against far out ways the evidence for the advert. When I was in Belgium I went in a canteen that had a ceiling of about four feet. It was waterlogged; the water was about a foot deep and my trainers a ruined Black Adder Chris Deaville 10W2 History ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level War Poetry section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level War Poetry essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Compare the ways in which Owen, Brooke and the Sassoon portray WW1

    3 star(s)

    Equally Sassoon feels the same. However, Brooke feels very different about the state and attitude of war. "Under an English heaven" This tells us Brooke declares his love for England and suggests England shall win the war. He is very open in agreeing with war and its state.

  2. Walking Wounded - review.

    will infer that the "birds" being referred to are the War planes. The "branches of leafed steel", refer to the wings of the plane. "Hiding round eyes" and "ripe grenades", refer to missiles and fresh grenades, which are ready to be dropped, and "birds" have been used to show that they fly.

  1. Died of Wounds was written by another well-known ww1 Poet, Siegfriel Sassoon. Sassoon was ...

    In the next verse Sassoon describes how he was going back to when he was at the frontline in the opening line." The ward grew dark; but he was still complaining". Sassoon, in the second verse uses speech to make the poem seem more realistic and that the event is happening at present.

  2. "The General" written by Siegfried Sassoon, an infantry officer on the Western Front in ...

    But the historian accepts that some people criticise the cost of Haig's methods, but he doesn't see them coming up with any other methods other than attrition. Source E obviously supports Haig and Source D criticises him. Well Haig was known as Butcher of the Somme when a lot of British lives were lost there.

  1. Henri Barbusse: UnderFire. Review of novel about French squad in WW1

    all this blood of men and things."3 These soldiers realized that as individuals they were easily spent and used up; it was the whole army that was valued, not the individual man. Part of the soldiers' perception of themselves as cannon-fodder stems from the loss of individualism in war. J.

  2. The Battle of the Somme 1916

    The writer mentions other countries: ''As ever the Australians and New Zealanders were to the fore.'' This must be because the book is for ''boys and girls of the Empire''. This includes Australia and New Zealand and since it was in the interest of the government to gather support for the war all over the Empire, this would have helped.

  1. The Battle of the Somme 1916 - source related study.

    If this is so, then it is likely that he is facing the wrong way. Why is he facing the wrong way? One solution to this may be that this is not a British trench, but possibly a trench they captured from the Germans.

  2. The year 1916 was the year of the Battle of the Somme.

    This line is very patriotic and publishing this line would help to maintain the war. Source E is a letter written by Lieutenant John Raws. This was his last letter. The letter we think is the people at home to show that Raws's friends had been murdered by the Generals

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work