• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The war on the western front.

Extracts from this document...


The war on the western front. 1. Source A was written by Craig Mair in 1982 for a textbook in a British School, the source was written 63 years after the First World War which makes it a secondary source. The Source describes clearly the events of the battle of the Somme. In the source there are mainly facts which are read as from my own knowledge I know the British army was told all the Germans would be dead and were unaware they had build deep bunkers below, thousands were killed. The Source was written for a British textbook so it seems unlikely the source will be inaccurate and there is little evidence indicating the source is biased. Craig Mair was not an eye-witness and must have collected information from others therefore his source must have been put together with different people's views on things. Most historians have there own opinion on accounts so that may have influenced his source. However the source does describe the effects of artillery and is reliable in the account the information in the source is correct. Source B is a photograph taken in September 1916 near the remains of a German machine gun post near Guillemont. As the photograph was taken during the war it's a primary source. Although the source is a photograph we must not automatically assume the source is reliable. This source could have been staged as we don't know what is around the area which is photographed. At the time both the British and German wanted to recruit men and keep Morale high so this could have been used as propaganda. Also this could only show part of an event. ...read more.


The slogan on the poster reads "time for one more" creating the image of War being relaxed and fun. The poster has two main aims one is to sell cigarettes another is for men to join the army. The poster shows hardly any realistic objects or settings in the poster, the only things the poster has in common with reality are the trenches, gun and the uniform. The trenches were normally infested with disease there was constant firing so any heads sticking out would have been shot before anyone could have the chance to realise. In the source there isn't anything other then the guns and trench setting to link the poster with the war combat. The trenches were muddy and the weather was always a problem. The reality of the trenches was far from a laid back clean environment. We now know that they were infested with mice, rats and dead bodies heaped upon one another and the stench of blood baking in the sun. Trenches were deep and often showed men and horses drowning in this much: The combat on the Western Front was constantly under raids there was firing at enemy lines, soldiers going over the top and constantly artillery barrages were going. This is all known due to knowledge from other evidence and in this poster none of this can be seen. I don't think anything can be learnt about the combat at the western Front in world war one as there is no detail or much reality in the poster except the government was desperate for recruits they were willing to lie to the public. However I do believe the source is very useful in understanding how propaganda was used and how morale was kept high. ...read more.


However, this failed. Had this attempt succeeded, it would have opened up a new route to the Black sea and Russia and drawn the Germans away from the Western Front. If this had happened then perhaps the allies may have won back land and maybe have won the war on the Western Front. The new weapons in the First World War also helped to make the war last longer, as they added yet more new conditions to the war. Nobody was really sure what tactics to use against them. The British tanks, brought in 1916, during the Somme, failed to make a big impact. The next year in November 1917 at Cambrai, the tanks were improved and managed to break through the German barbed wire but over stretched themselves and got into trouble. Tanks, in order to have any real effect forced new tactics upon the generals and this took many battles and a lot of time to perfect these tactics and thus lengthening the war (eventually in 1918 it was well used and feared). Gas also lengthened the war because nobody was really sure what to do to avoid this incredibly effective weapon. Gas caused many deaths during the war but it was rather unpredictable if the wind blew. However, this only lengthened the war rather than shortened it and caused an even bigger deadlock situation between the two sides. Also the technology slowed the down as there was less war effort. Other reason the war wasn't a short war was the fact both armies had huge armies and heavy industries this caused there factories to produce huge quantities of weapons also the generals on both sides were confused by the new situation they had only planned a war of movement with cavalry and now had to develop new tactics for a new kind of war. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level War Poetry section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level War Poetry essays

  1. To what extent was poor leadership responsible for massive loss of life, and stalemate ...

    Something that still lives in the minds of veterans as thousands upon thousands of their comrades were simply wiped out. This is probably the greatest example of the extent of poor leadership that existed during the First World War, and ended in calamity with loss of life on an entirely new scale.

  2. The Battle of the Somme 1916

    Told for boys and girls of the Empire.' We are not told the author of the book, but the title suggests that he was British or from a country with the Empire, so he and the book were probably biased.

  1. The idea of trenches first started in the battle of the Marne in September ...

    We wore our great coats, with full equipment on top of this. Our mack we put on top of the pack. Our water bottle was full and of course we carried our mess tin, also mug and cutlery. The one blanket we were allowed to take was rolled in the

  2. Source Work : The War On the Western Front

    As they didn't know what else to do. There for it can be perceived that this is an accurate representation of the commanders in the trench's at that time. 3.The two sources are contrasting the first (Source D) is totally against Haig and gives him no praise as a general.

  1. The impact of bombing during WWII

    Many people felt they were fighting against the Germans simply by carrying on amidst the devastation. This man was obviously brave to try and prepare the bodies for burial and must have felt a strong duty to his people and country to carry out such a task.

  2. The aims of the allies were when they engaged in the battle of the ...

    The allies lost 620,000 men, the Germans 450,000. On the first day alone the British casualties numbered 55,000. The losses were tremendous with the allies losing far more men than the enemy, 170,000 more in fact. As Lloyd George wrote: "It is claimed that the battle of the Somme destroyed

  1. 'Lions Led by Donkeys'. How valid is this interpretation of the conduct of British ...

    dear, I have just received your letter dear and was very pleased to get it. It came rather more punctual this time for it only took five days. We are not in the same place dear, in fact we don't stay in the same place very long...

  2. Why was Trench Warfare so terrible

    This truce often extended to the wagons which delivered such sustenance. Truces such as these rarely lasted long; usually a senior officer would hear of its existence and quickly stamp it out.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work