To what extent does the tragedy of Titus Andronicus unfold from the protagonist and his actions?

Authors Avatar

To what extent does the tragedy of Titus Andronicus unfold from the protagonist and his actions?

The tragic events that take place throughout the play of Titus Andronicus all come from the catalyst of Titus slaying Tamora's eldest son, Alarbus. Tamora begged for Alarbus' life as the crime he's accused of is protecting his own people. At this point his murder is unnecessary and unjust. A murder being defined as an unlawful killing and whilst at the time the play was written this may have been considered unjust, to an audience today it would not constitute death. From this point onwards all else becomes an act of revenge from this original deed.

In the very first instance of the play we have many impressions given of Titus in a very small amount of time. Titus comes into the play with all the honour and nobility you'd expect of a Roman hero, as 'Shakespeare draws on the standard motifs of austere republican virtue that typify Rome's "great ethical heroes"'. He follows this seemingly heroic entrance with his interaction with Tamora, in contrast he appears as a harsh, unfeeling character here. Despite this harshness we see when given the opportunity to become emperor he refuses the power in light of his traditionalism, an aspect of his character that truly is his downfall as if he had accepted this offer he would have become emperor, preventing Tamora gaining any power and demolishing any chances of the subsequent tragedy. It is possible that he turns down the position of emperor because of a slight insecurity as he claims 'a better head her glorious body fits'. As one of the many first impressions we gain of Titus we see that of an altruistic old man, however prior and subsequent actions cause the audience to deviate from this as a final opinion. In the Hopkins adaptation of the play the first scenes very much contradict each other and set the tale of an almost childlike unsureness of Titus' self, he tries to be a strong leader whilst doubting his strength, causing the audience to doubt Titus and his character. If this doubt is not the reason for his objections then we are left with his traditionalism as his reasoning, in which case the audience still see a great flaw in Titus as he's willing to put his family and the empire in jeopardy simply to uphold tradition.

Join now!

In the play we often see Titus' traditionalism in his acts, the first of which would be his support of Saturninus. He asks the people to 'create your emperor's eldest son, Lord Saturnine.' His reasoning appears here to be that he is choosing the eldest son, who would have been the rightful heir to the throne. Titus' support then leads Saturninus to choose Lavinia as his future empress. In the Hopkins interpretation of the play we see Bassianus and Lavinia together, and so immediately we know of Titus' awareness of their relationship, Titus' hesitance leads to the impression that ...

This is a preview of the whole essay