To what extent is Willy Loman a tragic hero?

Authors Avatar

To What Extent Is Willy Loman A Tragic Hero?

The play, “Death of a Salesman”, written by Arthur Miller, is about the ‘American Dream’ and a man so disillusioned by it that he becomes a modern day ‘tragic hero’.

Tragic heroes derive from the Greeks, but Shakespeare adapted his own genre for tragedy. Most Shakespearean tragedies all fit the same pattern, which is that the protagonist is of noble birth and have a fatal character flaw which usually leads to their demise. Arthur Miller took Shakespeare’s ideas for what a tragic hero should be and made them relevant to this time period. One particular critic thought, “a contemporary audience can no longer accept that a tragic hero is punished by comic force…A tragedy must be brought about by… recognisable social factors.” This means that the factors of Shakespearean and Aristotelian tragedies are outdated for a modern day audience, audiences cannot accept that the protagonist falls due to a higher power, it must be something they can relate to or understand.

Willy Loman is a struggling salesman around the age of sixty. He lives with his wife Linda and two sons Biff and Happy. Willy does not fit the usual criteria established by Shakespearean or Aristotelian tragedies. Firstly, he is not of noble birth, although in the play Miller makes a link known to the audience because Willy is made to appear of noble birth as he is in fact referred to as, “a prince”, by his son. Miller commented, “I believe that the common man is as apt a subject for tragedy in its highest sense as kings were”. This gives us clear insight why Willy is still a tragic hero even if he is not of high social ranking or status. It allows us to see that Miller believed that it is just as tragic, if not more, to see “the common man” fall from grace because it is more real and relatable to the audience.

Join now!

Another difference between Miller and Shakespeare’s tragedies is that Shakespeare’s heroes were motivated by lust, greed and ambition, whereas Willy is simply determined to live the ‘American Dream’. During the 1940’s, the ‘American Dream’ was something every ‘ordinary man’ strived to achieve. Willy had a stunted image of the ‘American Dream’, he believed whole heartedly in the success and easy wealth it claimed to give. It could be said that this is the key view which makes Willy a tragic hero because if you were to compare themes from ‘Death of a Salesman’ to a traditional tragedy such as ...

This is a preview of the whole essay

Here's what a star student thought of this essay

This essay has a poor structure, as mentioned above. The introduction offers nothing - examiners will hate to see introductions which simply explain the author of the play and a short plot summary. Instead, introductions should engage with the question and set up a cogent argument. Similarly, the conclusion is poor - it may seem to draw upon evidence, but this is not clear, and the use of the first person should be avoided. Using the first person makes any views seem personal, whereas arguments should be built upon the foundations of evidence and analysis. Spelling, punctuation and grammar are fine.

The analysis here is basic, and there is little focus on literary construction. Comments such as "Music is also heard throughout the play, it is used to represent Willy's inability to focus on reality" show potential, but there is no real evidence of how it is used and what effect it has on the audience. Whenever you are analysing tragedy, I would always recommend referring all your points back to how the audience respond, as this allows a discussion on the reception and intent of the play. This essay has the tendency to retell, rather than analyse, and this is mostly due to the poor structure of the argument. If the essay had chosen to analyse a few main characteristics of a tragic hero, they wouldn't have to narrate with comments such as "He never comes to terms with reality". Looking at dramatic techniques such as soliloquies would be relevant here.

This essay engages with the concept of tragedy well, but I don't think direct comparisons with Shakespearian tragedies is the best way to construct an argument. If I were answering this question, I would begin with a strong introduction using Miller's essay "Tragedy and the Common Man" to begin the argument that the play is still a tragedy, and then summarise the main characteristics of a tragic hero in this context. The question isn't asking "To what extent is Willy Loman a Shakespearian tragic hero?" so comments such as "Another difference between Miller and Shakespeare's tragedies" adds nothing to the argument. The most sophisticated arguments will be looking at how Miller has adapted tragedy.