Whilst the play is entitled Othello, Iago is arguably the focus of the play- and thus his malignant influence could be interpreted as a pollutant that distorts Othello from a romantic comedy into a tragedy.

Authors Avatar

‘Iago “rewrites” ‘Othello’: a play which begins as a romantic comedy, but which ends as a tragedy’

Evaluate the relationship between tragedy and comedy in ‘Othello’ in light of this comment.

Whilst the play is entitled ‘Othello’, Iago is arguably the focus of the play- and thus his malignant influence could be interpreted as a pollutant that distorts ‘Othello’ from a romantic comedy into a tragedy. At the outset of the play, it seems as though ‘Othello’ may be a romantic comedy in the vein of ‘Much Ado About Nothing’, as the contemporary Jacobean audience would undoubtedly have found the hapless Roderigo an entertaining embodiment of Schadenfreude. However, the tone of the play is instantly soured by Iago’s use of prejudiced, offensive language with regards to the eponymous protagonist of the play – describing him as a “black ram” and his lovemaking with his wife as “making the beast with two backs”. This offensive episode is a microcosm for the way Iago ‘rewrites’ ‘Othello’ as a tragedy - influencing potentially harmless situations and warping them into life-shattering incidents. However, it is also possible that Iago is merely a catalyst for the inevitable tragedy that was destined to befall Othello, whose hamartia of pride ultimately consigned the play to end in tragedy.

In fact, Othello could be viewed as the embodiment of the Aristotelian ‘tragic hero’, his fatal flaw dooming him to failure. Described by A. C. Bradley as “the most romantic among all Shakespeare’s heroes” and by F. R. Leavis as “egotistical”, Othello is a polarising character who evokes myriad reactions from critics. However, the influence of Iago is such that most of the critical evaluation of Othello’s character relies on the emphasis one places on Iago’s influence. Even before we are introduced to Othello, our perception of him has been tainted by Iago, who refuses to name him in the opening scene and uses a negative semantic field of prejudice to colour the audience’s impression, “the moor”, “black ram”. Whilst this impression is dispelled by Othello’s eloquent use of blank verse in Act I Scene III, and rhetoric so powerful the Duke is forced to acknowledge, “that tale would win my daughter too”, Iago’s influence continues to linger with Othello accused of “black magic” by Brabantio. This theme of race perverts a situation which could be suitable in a romantic comedy, the marriage of a couple without parental consent. Here, it could be argued both that Iago ‘rewrote’ the situation and that Othello’s colour made the situation inevitable.

Join now!

The central plot of the play, Othello’s doubts about Desdemona’s fidelity, could also be found as comedic insofar as the evidence is almost slapstick in its authenticity – the status of the dropped handkerchief as the “ocular proof” of Desdemona’s guilt an almost farcical indication of either Othello’s blindness due to the “green-eyed monster” or Iago’s Machiavellian ability to ‘rewrite’ the play and use this flimsy evidence to exact his revenge on Othello, “wife for wife”. In terms of dramatic effect, it could be argued that the importance of the handkerchief is a negative indictment on Shakespeare – a ...

This is a preview of the whole essay