The purpose of the essay is to critically evaluate how the interpretation of work and leisure on a global scale has affected leisure and tourism trends in Europe.

Authors Avatar

Contemporary International Issues

The purpose of the essay is to critically evaluate how the interpretation of work and leisure on a global scale has affected leisure and tourism trends in Europe. In order to complete the remit it is necessary to discuss work patterns around the world and draw comparisons upon each paid annual holidays. Doing so would enable one to examine the implications for leisure and tourism trends in Europe.      

In order to understand how work affects leisure there is a need for the relationship to be examined separately in each of these various aspects. The ancient Greeks regarded the most desirable and the only “good life” as one of leisure. Work, in the sense of supplying the basic necessities of life, was a “…degrading activity which was to be allocated to the lowest groups within the social order, and to slaves.” Watson (1987). Where once not to work had “been an indicator of prestige and a good life it is now associated with failure, a poor life and even disgrace”.  Godbey (1999). In today’s modern society the concept of work ethic “…values the importance of work, to the identity and sense of worth of an individual”. The growth of industrial capitalism the spreading of work becomes the essential requirement of personal and social advancement, of prestige, virtue and self-fulfilment.  

Karl Marx believed employment was not about the money, but the solution to an individual’s happiness and fulfilment. For Marx men and women constructed their being through productive activities that we create through work. Believing it transforms the worker into a conscience, goal-directed, skilful person.  Csikszentmihalyi (1992) suggested if one is stimulated and satisfied by their work they can achieve flow. Csikszentmihalyi (1992) defined flow as a state of concentration so focused that it amounts to complete absorption in an activity.  

The work culture differs from many parts of the world. Hasegawa (2002) identifies that the Japanese approach human resource management differently from that used by their western counterparts. The Japanese introduced the concept of lifetime employment, its theory involves workers to manufacture production in mass and stay on at the company and grow as it does. Lifetime employment served this cause well since they are known for being the leaders in mass production. When it comes to making the same products in large quantities, no one can do it more efficiently than the Japanese, however this is only achieved from their number of working hours.

According to The Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare (2003) the annual total actual hours worked in Japan has been steadily decreasing, totalling 1,837 hours in 2002 at businesses with 30 employees or more. However, the level of non-scheduled working hours is still high, though its total annual number decreased to 137 hours in 2002.  

Japan has recently become under headline for its “fatal work ethic”. A recent survey by the Japanese Trade Union Confederation estimates one in thirty male workers in their early 30s put in more than 3,000 hours a year; equivalent to 58 hours a week, a level already defined by the government as a threat to health. (Scotland on Sunday 2004)  According to Hasegawa (2002) the Japanese government first recognised a link between work and death in 1987, when “Karoshi” was recognised a medical disease. The Japan Times described the term karoshi as death from overwork, which they believed, has become a social condition. Boe (1996) believes karoshi is now the second leading cause of death after cancer. Stating there are 10,000 confirmed victims, although many believe the number in fact is upwards of 30,000.    

 

America has developed a work culture different from what was expected forty years ago, as the impact of technology made human labour redundant. It was widely assumed that a four-hour workday, or a three-day week, or even a six-month year would eventually be the average. Schor (2002) the economist predicted the U.S. workforce was heading into a crisis of leisure, that people would have much free time. Those forecasts could not have been more incorrect. According to Harvard Economist Schor (2002), the amount of time Americans spend at work has increased over the last two or three decades. Stating "the average employed person is now on the job an additional 163 hours, or the equivalent of one month a year," compared to figures for 1969. Professor Schor estimated that U.S. manufacturing employees alone work 320 hours more than their French or German counterparts.  

Join now!

Statistics from the Industrial Labour Organisation illustrated in 2002 the average annual hours was 1,815; Japan worked in comparison to America was just 33 more hours.  Although the figures are not far apart the latest figures from The Journal News (2004) show for the first time since World War II, America surpassed Japan in the number of hours spent working. A recent user poll illustrated, almost three out of every four respondents said they work more than the presumed normal 40 hours per week: 45 percent said they work 41 to 50 hours per week, 17 percent said they ...

This is a preview of the whole essay