• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent did the 'collective' farms of Eastern Europe work?

Extracts from this document...


To what extent did the 'collective' farms of Eastern Europe work? The ideology of collectivisation 1st became a viable policy in Stalinist Russia. The primary thinking behind this revolutionary initiative was to improve agricultural production to a level that could sustain the ever-increasing urban masses. Furthermore the decision makers in Eastern Europe wished to ensure an abundant supply of cheap food was available so that they could control, and keep real wage rates at a manageable level. The collectivisation of agriculture was envisaged by the socialist regimes as the "Ideal vehicle to achieve this objective." (1) The large-scale cultivation necessitated by collectivisation was seen by the socialist regime as a fundament strategy to improve the total productivity of the agricultural sector. Within a short space of time its origins and principles had began to spread rapidly throughout the Eastern European states, until the widespread adoption of the policy became an essential tool for the majority of socialist regimes. As one looks at collectivisation throughout Eastern Europe, it becomes apparent early on that no 2 nation states had identical results from the adoption of this policy. Each State has to be judged on its own merits and individual socio-economic results. Hungary, Poland and Czechoslovakia were 3 infant states that had collectivisation enforced upon them by the expansionist German regime. In the immediate aftermath of the war they simultaneously decided that they would progress with the 'cooperative farm' ethos that the Nazi government had installed in their societies. It had shown a level of effectiveness and efficiency that when manipulated can have huge governmental benefits. ...read more.


(3) Whatever agricultural system was adopted, the stark fact remained that all Eastern European states continued to struggle to provide cheap food for the urban masses. With the pressure on foodstuffs mounting some alarming signals came to light. In Bulgaria in 1962 for example, the government of the day had to import copious amounts of wheat from Canada to quell disturbances originating from food shortages in the industrialising cities. The reasons for the productive inefficiencies cannot be labelled solely at the door of collectivisation. Other factors need to be taken into account. Admittedly, Bulgarian weather played a role in deteriorating crop growth. Also the lack of competent infrastructure in many of the socialist territories led to vast inefficiencies. M. Kaser and E.A. Radice are of the opinion that poor infrastructure "Resulted in the loss of as much as a 1/4 of gross harvest output." (4) This is an astronomical amount of harvest to squander, but ultimately it underlines the inefficiencies that marred much of the socialist regime. The relationship between investment levels and output within the socialist economies should have a positive correlation. Bearing this in mind, one can assume that the outcome of increased tractor provision and use of chemical fertilizers would lead to higher yield from the same amount of land. It seems that throughout this period it was chemical fertilizers that most cooperative farms relied upon the increase productivity rates. Between 1948 and 1971 the use of chemical fertilizer increased 7 fold in Czechoslovakia, and as much as 24 times its original rate in Hungary. ...read more.


The socialist governments of the day prioritised and supported the need for industrialisation over agricultural performance. This ultimately initiated the steady transformation from a predominantly agrarian society to the industrialised nations that we have today. Successful collective farms were no longer a governments 1st economic priority, thus its relative success rate would undoubtedly start to diminish. This leads me to believe that during specific periods in certain countries collectivisation was a successful policy to operate. But there are also individual circumstances where collectivisation had a relative inadequate outcome. In particularly, the incentives for agricultural production were basic at best; this ultimately had an adverse effect on a nations economic prosperity. It is on these grounds that I have made the assumption that, although the collective farms of Eastern Europe played an important role in revolutionising agricultural production. The extent to which they were a success will remain inconclusive for many years to come. Referencing: (1) D. H. Aldroft and S. Morewood, Economic change in Eastern Europe since 1918 (Aldershot, 1995), p. 118. (2) D. H. Aldroft and S. Morewood, Economic change in Eastern Europe since 1918 (Aldershot, 1995), p. 122. (3) D. H. Aldroft and S. Morewood, Economic change in Eastern Europe since 1918 (Aldershot, 1995), p. 119. (4) M. Kaser and E.A. Radice, (eds.) The Economic History of Eastern Europe 1919-1975, Volume II: Interwar Policy, the War and Reconstruction (Oxford, 1985), p. 67. (5) L. P. Morris, Eastern Europe since 1945, p. 109. (6) L. P. Morris, Eastern Europe since 1945, p. 109. (7) L. P. Morris, Eastern Europe since 1945, p. 107. (8) L. P. Morris, Eastern Europe since 1945, p. 109. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Production - Location & Change section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Production - Location & Change essays

  1. The Role and Importance of Agriculture In the Carribean. Organisations involved in its ...

    Disadvantages * A higher level of management is required. * There is a need to find market for different types of produce. * Animals can damage crops if the y are not properly enclosed or tied. Organic Farming Organic farming is the use of agricultural systems to produce food and fiber without the use of artificial pesticides, fertilizer and genetically modified plants.

  2. Is Biological Pest Control Better Than Chemical Control?

    These consumers also ate the red spider-mite. Now the red spider-mite has become a major pest and it is resistant to many pesticides. As its natural enemies have disappeared, farmers end up with a greater number of pests than when the pesticide was first used.

  1. The Multiplier effect explained and with examples.

    According to the source (www.bbc.co.uk, October 23, 2003), house price in the M4 Corridor increased twice, while in the South Wales it increased for 42% during the period from 1999 till the year 2003. As the population goes up and cities become bigger, another social change like the increase of the number of vacancies for jobs becomes obvious.

  2. To what extent do the sources agree that Russian Government Policy on agriculture consistently ...

    output increased in 1965, which presents a limited amout of support for the reforms, yet in general supports its failure. The reliability of source 5 is extremly limited as we have no regognition of its origin or the writer. It is a resonable assumption that the statisitics are from the

  1. What is meant by the terms core and periphery?

    The national cores we associate ourselves with include the following: South East of England with London as the core or at continental scale which includes South East England, Northern France - Paris, Northern Italy - Geneva, Western Germany and Benelux countries.

  2. "Can the theories that Alfred D. Chandler developed in his book 'Scale and Scope: ...

    Chandler develops these theories by tracing what he calls "the collective history" of the most important growth industries of the second industrial revolution. He divides these into those that mainly offer a potential for economies of scale and those that are more scope intensive.

  1. How successful was Stalin's attempt to industrialise the Soviet Union?

    The cities were crowded with people from the countryside and one historian uses the term 'ruralisation' to describe this growth. Magnitogorsk lacked the basic resources needed for workers' housing and the conditions in which the workers lived were appalling. Thus industrialisation did certainly occur but the people who actually brought the factories to life were often the losers.

  2. Why is the issue of agricultural subsidies such a contentious issue in WTO negotiations?

    Also agriculture is huge contributor to these nations' GDP. So the nature of agriculture is subsistence as far as South is concerned. On the other hand, North is not dependant on agriculture for employment. Also the share of agriculture in GDP is low.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work