• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why did Agriculture not share in the ‘boom’ of the 1920’s ?

Extracts from this document...


Why did Agriculture not share in the 'boom' of the 1920's ? Not all people and businesses shared in the prosperity of the 1920's. The worst of the effected was the agricultural industry. There are many reasons as to why agriculture did not share in the boom of the such as falling demand, World War 1, overproduction and increased competition. All of these link together to explain the reasons why agriculture did not share in the boom. At the end of World War 1, America had exported a great deal of it's resources such as wheat, to Europe. Now that the war had ended, Europe was left poor and could not afford much of this trade anymore as the prices were too high. They had become America's main market so this loss of market meant that the businesses selling their resources to Europe lost profit. ...read more.


The tariffs and competition completely desecrated their business concerning exports to outside of America but within America, they would have problems selling their produce too. During the 1920's, America's population was falling which meant that there were fewer mouths to feed. The overproduction of products such as wheat that was caused by new technology (better machinery such as the combine harvester) meant that there was a surplus amount of product that nobody wanted. People weren't buying as much because of the lack of people and also because the new 'Roaring Twenties' lifestyle was very luxurious and many people now demanded meats and vegetables. The farmers of the 'luxury' products of course did not suffer as badly in fact some prospered. For example, the shipping of lettuce went up by 38,000 crates between 1920 and 1928. The surplus amounts of the other products such as wheat also lowered the value of the product so that even if the Americans were ...read more.


This didn't just effect the prices of cotton but the wages aswell. People were employed to pick the natural fibres and because the business lost profit, wages were cut. The worst effected of these was maize where the price for a bushel went from 45 pence to 10 pence. All of these reasons explain how agriculture did not share in the boom of the 1920's and I think that overproduction is probably the factor that had the largest restricting and devastating effect on agriculture because if it had not happened, the businesses and small farmers would not have been effected so greatly. It wouldn't have lowered the prices even further as it did which was not needed at all because of all the other factors that have been explained and the businesses would possibly have suffered less greatly. All the reasons mentioned though were needed to have such a large scale effect on the agricultural industry during such a prospering time in America's history. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Production - Location & Change section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Production - Location & Change essays

  1. The Role and Importance of Agriculture In the Carribean. Organisations involved in its ...

    Inter-American Development Bank (I.D.B.) The oldest and largest regional institution of multilateral development. The aim is to accelerate economic and social development in Latin American and Caribbean countries. Operations cover the entire spectrum of infrastructure, energy, transportation and urban development. Current lending priorities: poverty reduction, social equity and modernization.

  2. The Multiplier effect explained and with examples.

    Talking about human and economic location factors, it is useful to start with such important factor as labour.

  1. Is Biological Pest Control Better Than Chemical Control?

    In the US, the two-spot ladybird was successfully bred and released in orange groves to eat the aphids on the orange trees. There are also, wasps (encarsia) that lay their eggs in the bodies of young whitefly. The whitefly is killed by the development inside it of a wasp from an egg.

  2. Major innovations in agriculture have always proved to be controversial. With reference to recent ...

    The increasing demand for organic goods has led to the growth of organic farming in many parts of the world especially in MEDCs. Organic farming can be considered as a method of sustainable farming as produces food but also conserves the environment as it excludes the use of chemicals but

  1. Importance of Agriculture in Argentina

    Pastoral farming is leaving the land under the grass for the grazing of animals. Sheep farming is one of the main industries of Argentina. That is why they are the ninth largest cotton and wool producers. One of the reasons for pastoral farming is so that they can export live animals to other countries.

  2. The Relationships Between Human Health and Agriculture

    Undoubtedly, the most significant agricultural products contributing to the 'absence of infirmity or illness' in human beings are alimentary products. The fruits, vegetables, cereals, nuts, meat, milk, produced by cultivation, contain vitamins and minerals as well as proteins, carbohydrates, and lipids, which are indispensable to maintain a healthy, functioning organism.

  1. Is biological pest control better than chemical pest control?

    Chemical control is the use of pesticides. Insects, which eat crops, can be killed with insecticides. Fungi, which grow on crops, are controlled with fungicides. Weeds, which compete with crop plants for water, light and minerals, can be controlled with herbicides; pesticides are usually applied as pellets, powders or sprays.

  2. Soil Degradation in Canada

    relatively sloppy agriculture probably reflected not only Ontario's distance from principle markets, which led to relatively lower land values and hence to more extensive agricultural practice, but also the careless approach to land that had developed in the years of wheat-fallow-farming.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work