• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

“How significant was Bismarck in securing the unification of Germany 1862 – 1871?”

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Year 12 AS Coursework Bismarck and the Unification of Germany c. 1848 - 71 Question 2 (50 marks) "How significant was Bismarck in securing the unification of Germany 1862 - 1871?" To credit Otto von Bismarck with uniting Germany throughout the period of 1862 to 1871 seems absurd, given his "contempt for nationalism and liberalism"(i). However, there are several perspectives on which a historian can view the events leading up to the eventual unification of Germany, all with differing attitudes towards exactly how attributable Bismarck was for the unification of the German states. The focus of this essay is, bearing all of these viewpoints in mind, to analyse Bismarck's motives and intentions behind his decisions from 1862 to 1871 as well as other factors, and to present them from the differing viewpoints with the intention of assessing the importance of his contribution to the eventual unification of Germany. The Bismarckian interpretation is one mostly advocated by modern historians such as Gall and Craig, Bismarck in his memoirs of 1890, and also by statements made by ministers of the time: Disraeli was told by Bismarck of his plans to "attack Denmark in order to get Schleswig-Holstein; he will put Austria out of the confederation." ...read more.

Middle

The manoeuvre to aid Russia in the Polish revolt was more self-preservation than anything else; practically speaking, Bismarck sealed off the borders with Poland to prevent the riots spreading to Prussia and its lot in Poland. It is quite possible that Bismarck was first and foremost a pragmatist, with the aim of expanding Prussian territory as much as possible but with events leading, quite accidentally, to the unification of Germany - similar in many ways to Cavour in Italy. His decisions in Schleswig-Holstein again could be interpreted as a move to prevent it's independence, as this would prove a formidable barrier to annexation. While it is difficult to argue Bismarck did not in some way pre-plan this - many decisions made by Bismarck indicate he was antagonising Austria into war - the logical reason for his doing so is more in line with his own 'realpolitik' ideals than the romanticist notions he ridiculed. As Michael John states in The Unification of Germany, "Bismarck's only clear policy was his determination to prevent any attempt by the Austrians to reassert their leadership of the German States. Bismarck certainly entertained the idea of a united 'Kleinduschland' under Prussian domination, but he was not committed to fighting a war to make this possible." ...read more.

Conclusion

His statesmanship and ability to manipulate the political and international situation of the time are undeniable, but the factors he was not able to foresee and prepare for are evidence that Bismarck had not masterminded the entire series of events, and could not be credited for them except if to congratulate his 'strategy of alternatives'. It could be argued that his significance in unifying Germany stretched only as far as his ability to facilitate current events to successfully secure the next - for example, had Austria had won the war against Prussia, there would have been little hope for the creation of a North German Confederation and France would never have intervened. Bismarck was ostensibly the most important factor in the unification of Germany in 1871 - of course, Prussia was gaining strength and the international situation was ripe for a change in the balance of power, but it took the Prussian minister-president to utilise these individual factors for the eventual formation of a united Germany, whether it was his original intention or not. (i) Whitfield, Germany 1848 - 1914 (ii) Michael John, The Unification of Germany (iii) Breuilly, The First German Unification, 1847-71 (iv) Smith, Bismarck's planning of German Unification (v) Breuilly, The First German Unification, 1847-71 (vi) AJP Taylor, The Struggle for Mastery in Europe (vii) Whitfield, Germany 1848 - 1914 (viii) Michael John, Early Modern History ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. To what extent was Bismarck responsible for German unification?

    Bismarck then pressured the southern German states into unification by saying that if any Kings or Dukes opposed it then they would be overthrown. The last thing he had to do was persuade the King William, he done this by getting King Ludwig of Bavaria to offer Bismarck the throne

  2. To what extent should Bismarck receive credit for the unification of Germany?

    The first of these wars arose from the Schleswig - Holstein question, though it may not seem as important as the other two wars, the Schleswig -Holstein question set the stage for the final demolishing of the first barrier, Austria.

  1. To what extent was the contribution of Bismarck to German unification the most important ...

    The more successful Bismarck gets the more power he achieves The northern German confederation was established after the Astro- Prussian war. All the land annexed by Prussia and all the states north of the river Main were members. It had control of the armed services and foreign policy.

  2. What were the obstacles to German Unification immediatly before the 1848 Revolutions

    It was an obstacle because it reminded the German States that Austria was the leader of the states and it was still powerful, with Austria oppose to unification every other power in the Confederation would follow Austria's lead, not just because they disagreed with unification but because they would be

  1. Hitlers Germany

    The defeat in the first ballot brought Goebbels to despair; but Hitler, now that he had committed himself, with great presence of mind dictated the announcement that he would stand a second time and got it on to the streets almost before the country had learned of his defeat.

  2. How significant was Bismarck in securing the unification of Germany 1862-71?Bismarck's significance in securing ...

    in order to maintain Prussian dominance. Austria's relations with Russia were at a low point after the Crimean war where Austria's failure to support Russia, even after Russia had intervened and helped maintain Austrian rule in Hungary in 1849, meant that the long standing alliance between these two powers had come to an end .

  1. "To What Extent Can Bismarck Claim The Credit For German Unification".

    The revolutions, which took place in France, Italy and the Austrian Empire along with the fall of prince Metternicht, encouraged the German nationalists who longed for a unified Germany. The middle classes also pressed for political reform. Revolts in Prussia caused the king to create a Prussian national assembly, which

  2. How far do you agree that Cavour made the most significant contribution to Italian ...

    His conquests of Sicily and Naples were a worrying development for Cavour who was deeply suspicious of Garibaldi?s republican and democratic views. Garibaldi?s intervention in the south forced Cavour to complete the unification process. Cavour now took the view that if Italy was going to be unified it would be

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work