• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

“How significant was Bismarck in securing the unification of Germany 1862 – 1871?”

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Year 12 AS Coursework Bismarck and the Unification of Germany c. 1848 - 71 Question 2 (50 marks) "How significant was Bismarck in securing the unification of Germany 1862 - 1871?" To credit Otto von Bismarck with uniting Germany throughout the period of 1862 to 1871 seems absurd, given his "contempt for nationalism and liberalism"(i). However, there are several perspectives on which a historian can view the events leading up to the eventual unification of Germany, all with differing attitudes towards exactly how attributable Bismarck was for the unification of the German states. The focus of this essay is, bearing all of these viewpoints in mind, to analyse Bismarck's motives and intentions behind his decisions from 1862 to 1871 as well as other factors, and to present them from the differing viewpoints with the intention of assessing the importance of his contribution to the eventual unification of Germany. The Bismarckian interpretation is one mostly advocated by modern historians such as Gall and Craig, Bismarck in his memoirs of 1890, and also by statements made by ministers of the time: Disraeli was told by Bismarck of his plans to "attack Denmark in order to get Schleswig-Holstein; he will put Austria out of the confederation." ...read more.

Middle

The manoeuvre to aid Russia in the Polish revolt was more self-preservation than anything else; practically speaking, Bismarck sealed off the borders with Poland to prevent the riots spreading to Prussia and its lot in Poland. It is quite possible that Bismarck was first and foremost a pragmatist, with the aim of expanding Prussian territory as much as possible but with events leading, quite accidentally, to the unification of Germany - similar in many ways to Cavour in Italy. His decisions in Schleswig-Holstein again could be interpreted as a move to prevent it's independence, as this would prove a formidable barrier to annexation. While it is difficult to argue Bismarck did not in some way pre-plan this - many decisions made by Bismarck indicate he was antagonising Austria into war - the logical reason for his doing so is more in line with his own 'realpolitik' ideals than the romanticist notions he ridiculed. As Michael John states in The Unification of Germany, "Bismarck's only clear policy was his determination to prevent any attempt by the Austrians to reassert their leadership of the German States. Bismarck certainly entertained the idea of a united 'Kleinduschland' under Prussian domination, but he was not committed to fighting a war to make this possible." ...read more.

Conclusion

His statesmanship and ability to manipulate the political and international situation of the time are undeniable, but the factors he was not able to foresee and prepare for are evidence that Bismarck had not masterminded the entire series of events, and could not be credited for them except if to congratulate his 'strategy of alternatives'. It could be argued that his significance in unifying Germany stretched only as far as his ability to facilitate current events to successfully secure the next - for example, had Austria had won the war against Prussia, there would have been little hope for the creation of a North German Confederation and France would never have intervened. Bismarck was ostensibly the most important factor in the unification of Germany in 1871 - of course, Prussia was gaining strength and the international situation was ripe for a change in the balance of power, but it took the Prussian minister-president to utilise these individual factors for the eventual formation of a united Germany, whether it was his original intention or not. (i) Whitfield, Germany 1848 - 1914 (ii) Michael John, The Unification of Germany (iii) Breuilly, The First German Unification, 1847-71 (iv) Smith, Bismarck's planning of German Unification (v) Breuilly, The First German Unification, 1847-71 (vi) AJP Taylor, The Struggle for Mastery in Europe (vii) Whitfield, Germany 1848 - 1914 (viii) Michael John, Early Modern History ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. To what extent was Bismarck responsible for German unification?

    This made the French declare war on Prussia just as Bismarck had wanted. The southern states declared their support for the Prussians. The Prussians won the war and made the treaty harsh on the French as it was a hard fought war and he wanted to weaken them.

  2. What were the obstacles to German Unification immediatly before the 1848 Revolutions

    foolish to come into conflict with the Habsburgs, so while Austria was oppose to unification was impossible. Another obstacle to German Unification in the beginning of 1848 was the power of Austria and Prussia, I have already said why they were so powerful, these two states worked in a state

  1. To what extent was the contribution of Bismarck to German unification the most important ...

    The more successful Bismarck gets the more power he achieves The northern German confederation was established after the Astro- Prussian war. All the land annexed by Prussia and all the states north of the river Main were members. It had control of the armed services and foreign policy.

  2. To what extent was German Unification driven by primarily economic forces?

    The developments in weapons technologies enable the unification of Germany because it allows Prussia to defeat Austria and then France, which allows Prussia to dominate Germany. Economics contributes to this because without a strong economy Prussia could not have had the budget to afford new weapons which would aid the

  1. Bismarck did not plan the unification of Germany. He merely reacted to events.

    Generally, France would not stood still to see a strong united Germany to be at her border. When the crown in Spain was vacant, it had literally opened another great spot for the other great powers to fill in the place.

  2. "To What Extent Can Bismarck Claim The Credit For German Unification".

    When this was of no help either he announced that in view of the constitutional crisis owing to parliament inability to act the king would have to rule by himself. This measure was a result of a gap in the Prussian constitution.

  1. To what extent should Bismarck receive credit for the unification of Germany?

    Bismarck was a very successful statesman greatly due to the fact that he was a practitioner of realpolitik. He had the ability to manipulate events to Prussia's advantage but also to the advantage of the Prussian monarchy. Bismarck knew very clearly that for a unified Germany to be under Prussian

  2. How far do you agree that Cavour made the most significant contribution to Italian ...

    His conquests of Sicily and Naples were a worrying development for Cavour who was deeply suspicious of Garibaldi?s republican and democratic views. Garibaldi?s intervention in the south forced Cavour to complete the unification process. Cavour now took the view that if Italy was going to be unified it would be

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work