• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

ACCIDENTAL AND UNEXPECTED. DISCUSS THIS VERDICT ON THE FALL OF THE JULY MONARCHY IN 1848.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

HOLLY BLYTH "ACCIDENTAL AND UNEXPECTED." DISCUSS THIS VERDICT ON THE FALL OF THE JULY MONARCHY IN 1848. The July monarchy fell on the 24th of February 1848, after Louis Philippe was forced to abdicate from the throne. This was caused by a mass protest on the streets of Paris, after a banquet was declared illegal. Situations escalated into a full revolution when republican broke into the hotel de ville, and held the king to account. There is still much discussion over how far this was intended to be a revolution, and to what extent it was just a protest which got out of hand and eventually escalated into a revolution which was unplanned and unexpected. There are three main views on why there was a revolution in 1848: the Marxist view, that it was a spontaneous working class uprising against the bourgeoisie; the ideological view, that middle class intellectual debating ideas such as republicanism started the revolution; and that it was a reaction to an old outdated regime, that failed to inspire people. The banquet movement began in July 1847 and was organised by the central committee of the seine. ...read more.

Middle

Also, many of them had invested in the railways, and they lost their money after the stock exchange collapsed leaving them even more aggravated by the situation. Some of the members of the banquet movement had been calling for a republic, and the banning of one of their event was the spark that started the protest. In addition to this, it was the middle classes who made up the national guard who crucially defected to the revolution by handing over their weapons, meaning it was less of a working class uprising than Marx argued. This would mean that it was far more ordered, and the discontent of the middle class meant that it was more predictable than some would argue. An alternate interpretation of the 1848 revolution was that it was an ideological revolution, led by intellectuals, and that even though the workers did turn out in force; it seems unlikely they would have if it had not been for the intellectual questioning of the government. France had been through a turbulent political climate since the first French revolution in 1989, and the revolution of 1848 was the logical conclusion to be drawn from the development of new political ideas, Furthermore, the previous attempts to restore ...read more.

Conclusion

would have had the ability to orchestrate the uprising effectively without the support of the middle classes, who made up the national guard who handed over their weapons. The middle classes were dissatisfied with their bourgeois monarch who failed to meet their needs, and many of the intellectuals among them had developed comprehensive alternative systems of republicanism, and socialism, which were debated in full throughout his reign, and were reminiscent of the first revolution. These ideas however had been around for a while, and their level of influence may have been exaggerated, and the main middle class supporters of reform wanted to alter the current system not create a new one. Therefore the revolution of 1848 was in a way accidental, as the events of the day were meant as not more than a protest against the banning of the banquet movement, however in the long term it looked like there was widespread support for change, and those who desired a new system of government took the opportunity to make a move while the king was on the back foot, and as the king had no real supporters everyone just allowed him to be overthrown, meaning a revolution could hardly have been called an unexpected even. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Other Historical Periods section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Other Historical Periods essays

  1. To what extent was the Dutch Revolt in 1572 primarily caused by Religion?

    intimidated"; Alva's army was reduced and control over its financing was handed to the rival Eboli faction. Alva felt cheated of the King's support which led to his obsession with victory, turning what might have been a reasonable response into a catastrophic regime of terror.

  2. Julius Caesars reform

    - Head Priest of Jupiter (Flamen Dialis) - Flamen Dialis had many restrictions - Becoming priest helped him slowly to gain power - Believed that he only held this position for a very short period of time because he was more interested in his future career (being a politician and a soldier)

  1. Assess the political, social and cultural significance of Versailles in the reign of Louis ...

    Perhaps the most renowned and iconic room was the Hall of Mirrors, designed by Jules Hardouin-Mansard. Charles Le Brun's ceiling centrepiece pictures Louis in Roman armour but mantled like a French king, dedicated to the military victories of Louis. Louis would use this room daily as he walked from his "private" apartment to Mass.

  2. Assess to what extent was Louis XIVs foreign policy less successful after 1684.

    The balance of power was extremely important because the balance of power had been in favour of France from 1661 - 1688. Despite these setbacks, both Louis and France were still able to gain some gloire. Firstly, gaining the Spanish Succession implied that the Bourbons had the upper hand in the dynastic struggle with the Hapsburgs.

  1. How effectively did the design and decoration of the Parthenon suit its function?

    These were also painted is bright glorious colours. The whole frieze shows the procession of the festivals that I have previously talked about. The frieze shows the order in which the festival would have made its way either side of the temple.

  2. How far was the monarchy stronger in 1603 than in 1485?

    In 1603 there is a stronger partnership between the monarchy and the nobility which is reflected in parliament. Like with Henry VIII, Elizabeth is not weary of powerful nobles. We do see however, a lot of power being given to the new men, especially Cecil.

  1. The outbreak of the 1905 revolution was due to the grievances of the peasants ...

    The kadets were the party of the liberal intelligentsia and contained land owners and the smaller industrial entrepreneurs. To contrast this, The Social Democrats had an entirely different aim. Their hope was to achieve revolution in Russia by following Karl Marx; he believed that that history was a continuous class struggle.

  2. To what extent could the Crusades be described as failure within the years 1095-1195?

    Innumerable crowd followed his call. Soon the whole army went on campaign. German King Conrad III and French King Louis VII took the helm of the army. In the 1147 spring Crusaders came out of Regensburg. The French preferred the way across the Mediterranean. German troops also without any troubles went through Hungary and entered the Byzantine lands.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work