• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

ACCIDENTAL AND UNEXPECTED. DISCUSS THIS VERDICT ON THE FALL OF THE JULY MONARCHY IN 1848.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

HOLLY BLYTH "ACCIDENTAL AND UNEXPECTED." DISCUSS THIS VERDICT ON THE FALL OF THE JULY MONARCHY IN 1848. The July monarchy fell on the 24th of February 1848, after Louis Philippe was forced to abdicate from the throne. This was caused by a mass protest on the streets of Paris, after a banquet was declared illegal. Situations escalated into a full revolution when republican broke into the hotel de ville, and held the king to account. There is still much discussion over how far this was intended to be a revolution, and to what extent it was just a protest which got out of hand and eventually escalated into a revolution which was unplanned and unexpected. There are three main views on why there was a revolution in 1848: the Marxist view, that it was a spontaneous working class uprising against the bourgeoisie; the ideological view, that middle class intellectual debating ideas such as republicanism started the revolution; and that it was a reaction to an old outdated regime, that failed to inspire people. The banquet movement began in July 1847 and was organised by the central committee of the seine. ...read more.

Middle

Also, many of them had invested in the railways, and they lost their money after the stock exchange collapsed leaving them even more aggravated by the situation. Some of the members of the banquet movement had been calling for a republic, and the banning of one of their event was the spark that started the protest. In addition to this, it was the middle classes who made up the national guard who crucially defected to the revolution by handing over their weapons, meaning it was less of a working class uprising than Marx argued. This would mean that it was far more ordered, and the discontent of the middle class meant that it was more predictable than some would argue. An alternate interpretation of the 1848 revolution was that it was an ideological revolution, led by intellectuals, and that even though the workers did turn out in force; it seems unlikely they would have if it had not been for the intellectual questioning of the government. France had been through a turbulent political climate since the first French revolution in 1989, and the revolution of 1848 was the logical conclusion to be drawn from the development of new political ideas, Furthermore, the previous attempts to restore ...read more.

Conclusion

would have had the ability to orchestrate the uprising effectively without the support of the middle classes, who made up the national guard who handed over their weapons. The middle classes were dissatisfied with their bourgeois monarch who failed to meet their needs, and many of the intellectuals among them had developed comprehensive alternative systems of republicanism, and socialism, which were debated in full throughout his reign, and were reminiscent of the first revolution. These ideas however had been around for a while, and their level of influence may have been exaggerated, and the main middle class supporters of reform wanted to alter the current system not create a new one. Therefore the revolution of 1848 was in a way accidental, as the events of the day were meant as not more than a protest against the banning of the banquet movement, however in the long term it looked like there was widespread support for change, and those who desired a new system of government took the opportunity to make a move while the king was on the back foot, and as the king had no real supporters everyone just allowed him to be overthrown, meaning a revolution could hardly have been called an unexpected even. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Other Historical Periods section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Other Historical Periods essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    To what extent was warfare between Britain and France the main contributory factor in ...

    3 star(s)

    weaker than the British industrialised economy was that the bad winters of 1788 and 1789 brought the French to a complete standstill, a large blow to their production.

  2. Assess the political, social and cultural significance of Versailles in the reign of Louis ...

    Nobles lived under a discipline which would have astonished their forebears. The noblesse d'epee had to show deference to the endless ceremonies and rituals. These never-ending public rituals involved Louis and his nobles in stringent rules of etiquette. Every act in its rituals was designed to emphasise Louis as the personification of royal power.

  1. To what extent was the Dutch Revolt in 1572 primarily caused by Religion?

    1573 yet the revolt still continued, supporting instead Peter Limm's idea that it was Philip to blame, as his underlying social tensions lasted throughout his reign from paranoia of the amount of Calvinists - suggested by Geoffrey Parker. However it is important to see that Alva's presence was a significant

  2. Assess to what extent was Louis XIVs foreign policy less successful after 1684.

    Secondly, although the French were defeated on several occasions, it did win some important battles, namely at Brihuega and Villa Victoba in 1710. Plus, the results of the Treaty of Utrecht suggest that France was still the dominating power in Europe.

  1. Julius Caesars reform

    and that he took the greatest pains to cultivate it, so that in this field the second place was indisputably his."- in Plutarch- Caesar, 3.

  2. The outbreak of the 1905 revolution was due to the grievances of the peasants ...

    He believed that autocracy was the only possible government for imperial Russia. As Pobedonostsev was such a big influence on Nicholas and behind many notions, one could argue that his impact prolonged social and political development in Russia leading to the revolution in 1905.

  1. To what extent could the Crusades be described as failure within the years 1095-1195?

    The Emperor, when asking help, expected to see the mercenary to whom he could pay money and who would be under his control. Instead he got from 50 to 70 thousand warriors of different kinds and with low combat skills as well as feudal commanders who, Emperor believed, did not share same goal of returning lost Byzantine?s lands.

  2. This paper is in response to the 2001 documentary, "Conquistadors: The Fall of The ...

    She was young, naive and unaware of Cortez's true intentions. As a slave, doing whatever Cortez wished was part of her duty and she would have been killed and replaced if she hadn't. Therefore I don't see Malinche as a traitor at all, she was simply a girl put into a bad situation and did what she could.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work