• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent can it be argued that threats to Henry VII were as a result of his usurpation?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

"To what extent can it be argued that threats to Henry VII were as a result of his usurpation?" During the 15th century, the throne of England was passed between the House of Lancaster and York and was decided on the battlefield or by other violent means. Due to these Wars of the Roses, as they are known, the English people were used too a switch in power and more importantly English politics had been dominated for almost a century by the aristocracy switching allegiances, plotting and other activities associated with usurpations. Therefore Henry's usurpation of Richard III at the Battle of Bosworth in 1485 wasn't something new to England, and indeed was another in a long line of usurpations; at the time nobody knew it would be the last. Wolffe supports this; "Hindsight has led generations of historians to exaggerate his prospects of success." However, Henry VII did face many threats in his 24 year reign, and here we will discuss whether they were as a result of his usurpation. The first threat that Henry faced was the question of his legitimacy. Descended from Edward III through John of Gaunt and Katherine Swynford, his ancestor John, Marquis of Somerset, was originally illegitimate. This line, known as the Beauforts, was legitimized in 1397, but was banned from the succession. ...read more.

Middle

Simnel was a large threat to Henry, especially as this uprising began in 1486, less than a year after Henry took the throne. Simnel claimed to be the Earl of Warwick, and gained the support of the Earl of Lincoln. His main support was in Ireland, where there were strong Yorkist sympathies and the Lords supported him mainly as a show of independence from England. After Henry produced the real Warwick to prove Simnel was a fake, Lincoln and Simnel fled to Burgundy, where Duchess Margaret (Richard III's sister) protected them and organised an army of 2000 German mercenaries. This army landed in England along with an Irish one in June 1487 in a bid to take over the throne. Although Henry defeated them at the Battle of Stoke, the nobles hadn't stopped the army, showing their indifference towards Henry. This was a threat to Henry because it showed up the hostility of two of England's neighbours (Ireland and Burgundy) and the indifference of his own nobles towards Henry. However, it must also be remembered that the uprising gained almost no support on mainland England. The other Pretender was Perkin Warbeck, who claimed to be Prince Richard, younger son of Edward IV (it is accepted that he was really murdered in the Tower with his brother Edward V). ...read more.

Conclusion

With the exception of the Yorkshire rebellion, the rebellions that Henry faced, including those of the two Pretenders, were all directly or indirectly caused by his usurpation, as they all wanted him off the throne. All except the Cornish rebellion were doing this in support of the Yorkist claim, which wouldn't have occurred if he, a Lancastrian hadn't usurped the throne. Henry, however, handled all of these threats well and flexibly; he was ruthless and showed mercy depending on the situation. In conclusion, ignoring that all the threats were down to the usurpation because if he hadn't taken the throne, he wouldn't have the threats in the first place, it is possible to argue that to a partial extent the threats Henry VII faced were due to his usurpation. Some of the threats he faced had nothing to do with his usurpation e.g. his weak legitimate claim, and others can be linked to his usurpation, but would either always have been a threat to whoever the monarch ascended the throne was e.g. other claimants to the throne or weren't completely linked to the usurpation. Other threats can de directly (or indirectly) linked to his usurpation e.g. the rise of Pretenders and the Stafford/Lovell uprising and the Cornish rebellion. Although the many threats proved how fragile his position really was, Henry managed to keep his throne and achieve his greatest aim; securing the Tudor dynasty. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics essays

  1. Free essay

    To what extent did Henry VII reduce the power of the nobility

    4 star(s)

    However it is valid to say that this only happened a handful of times so as an overall effect to the peerage as a whole it is relatively insignificant, however As a result it is reasonable to assume many of these severe fines crippled the nobility financially.

  2. Marked by a teacher

    To what extent was Henry VII a successful monarch?

    3 star(s)

    This problem tested Henry VII's capabilities in keeping with the appeasement of the citizens to keep them happy - and of course with his control over the use of his money. He overcame this problem with increased mobility across the land so that peasants and the poor could find work elsewhere and earn more wages.

  1. The Battle of Bosworth.

    This would mean disaster for Richard. Richard and Northumberland would have been unable to join the battle. Meanwhile, Henry was on the steeper western slope meaning the army of Richard would have to come down the slope and Henry would wait and defend.

  2. Securing the Tudor Dynasty: The Reign of Henry VII.

    The alliances also show that the major foreign powers like Spain and France recognise Henry as the rightful ruler of England, which is crucial, especially in the early part of his reign, as it means his right to the throne will not be readily challenged.

  1. How effective was Henry VII as a monarch?

    of Henry VII's foreign policy", and rightly so; Henry achieved all of his main aims with this treaty. The King gained recognition through the treaty as the Spanish Monarchs, who had emerged as a giant power in Europe, recognised him as a peer.

  2. How dangerous were the threats to Henry VII's government?

    the king were so sure that the king would win the battle and stayed back until they were sure that the King could win. The rebel army was the weakest army, due to lack of a leader, and the fact that the Irish retainers were poorly equipped.

  1. Were the pretenders a serious threat to Henry VII's throne?

    to be the one thing in which both Warbeck and Simnel failed miserably. It was the wrong time for them as the country was weary of civil strife, and reasonably content with Henry VII's rule. This flaw was the downfall of the pretenders, and meant they were a much less serious threat to the throne.

  2. This essay will be based around the Government of Henry VII and will view ...

    it was used as a pressure point in order to restore the French pension that Britain once got, in order for not attacking or invading France. Henry however did receive funds for a war against Scotland from Parliament but he never actually encountered a battle with them.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work