• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent can it be argued that threats to Henry VII were as a result of his usurpation?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

"To what extent can it be argued that threats to Henry VII were as a result of his usurpation?" During the 15th century, the throne of England was passed between the House of Lancaster and York and was decided on the battlefield or by other violent means. Due to these Wars of the Roses, as they are known, the English people were used too a switch in power and more importantly English politics had been dominated for almost a century by the aristocracy switching allegiances, plotting and other activities associated with usurpations. Therefore Henry's usurpation of Richard III at the Battle of Bosworth in 1485 wasn't something new to England, and indeed was another in a long line of usurpations; at the time nobody knew it would be the last. Wolffe supports this; "Hindsight has led generations of historians to exaggerate his prospects of success." However, Henry VII did face many threats in his 24 year reign, and here we will discuss whether they were as a result of his usurpation. The first threat that Henry faced was the question of his legitimacy. Descended from Edward III through John of Gaunt and Katherine Swynford, his ancestor John, Marquis of Somerset, was originally illegitimate. This line, known as the Beauforts, was legitimized in 1397, but was banned from the succession. ...read more.

Middle

Simnel was a large threat to Henry, especially as this uprising began in 1486, less than a year after Henry took the throne. Simnel claimed to be the Earl of Warwick, and gained the support of the Earl of Lincoln. His main support was in Ireland, where there were strong Yorkist sympathies and the Lords supported him mainly as a show of independence from England. After Henry produced the real Warwick to prove Simnel was a fake, Lincoln and Simnel fled to Burgundy, where Duchess Margaret (Richard III's sister) protected them and organised an army of 2000 German mercenaries. This army landed in England along with an Irish one in June 1487 in a bid to take over the throne. Although Henry defeated them at the Battle of Stoke, the nobles hadn't stopped the army, showing their indifference towards Henry. This was a threat to Henry because it showed up the hostility of two of England's neighbours (Ireland and Burgundy) and the indifference of his own nobles towards Henry. However, it must also be remembered that the uprising gained almost no support on mainland England. The other Pretender was Perkin Warbeck, who claimed to be Prince Richard, younger son of Edward IV (it is accepted that he was really murdered in the Tower with his brother Edward V). ...read more.

Conclusion

With the exception of the Yorkshire rebellion, the rebellions that Henry faced, including those of the two Pretenders, were all directly or indirectly caused by his usurpation, as they all wanted him off the throne. All except the Cornish rebellion were doing this in support of the Yorkist claim, which wouldn't have occurred if he, a Lancastrian hadn't usurped the throne. Henry, however, handled all of these threats well and flexibly; he was ruthless and showed mercy depending on the situation. In conclusion, ignoring that all the threats were down to the usurpation because if he hadn't taken the throne, he wouldn't have the threats in the first place, it is possible to argue that to a partial extent the threats Henry VII faced were due to his usurpation. Some of the threats he faced had nothing to do with his usurpation e.g. his weak legitimate claim, and others can be linked to his usurpation, but would either always have been a threat to whoever the monarch ascended the throne was e.g. other claimants to the throne or weren't completely linked to the usurpation. Other threats can de directly (or indirectly) linked to his usurpation e.g. the rise of Pretenders and the Stafford/Lovell uprising and the Cornish rebellion. Although the many threats proved how fragile his position really was, Henry managed to keep his throne and achieve his greatest aim; securing the Tudor dynasty. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics essays

  1. Free essay

    To what extent did Henry VII reduce the power of the nobility

    4 star(s)

    As money was a significant part of power to the peerage, the implementation of these laws which restricted the nobility in terms of men at arms, finances and inheritance, severely lessened the power of the nobility, therefore being the second most significant factor in their reduction of power.

  2. Essay: How serious was the Yorkist threat to Henry VII?

    Lincoln had huge foreign support and backing from Ireland and Burgundy but also had hoped to gain further support from the north of England, which had largely remained loyal to Richard III. Nevertheless, the response they received was disappointing and the rebels, with 8,000 men faced Henry's 12,000 in a field near East Stoke.

  1. Were the pretenders a serious threat to Henry VII's throne?

    to be the one thing in which both Warbeck and Simnel failed miserably. It was the wrong time for them as the country was weary of civil strife, and reasonably content with Henry VII's rule. This flaw was the downfall of the pretenders, and meant they were a much less serious threat to the throne.

  2. Was Lambert Simnel a greater threat to the security of Henry VII than Perkin ...

    Henry also took the threat from Scotland and from Warbeck very seriously indeed and as with France, decided to retaliate by raising his own invasion forces.

  1. To what extent can the Revolt of 1381 be explained as a protest against ...

    As they were fewer in number, surviving Serfs found, as Dunn writes, they were 'in a world where the equation of supply and demand had been turned upside down'. 9 With the economic strain of labour shortage in the years following 1348, it was only natural for the peasants to feel a sense of entitlement and advantage.

  2. The Battle of Bosworth.

    This shows that Richard was facing the north. This also implies what Henry was doing at this stage. Richard was expecting Henry to come out towards him facing the north. However, Henry's military strategists knowing this to be the case faced him on the western flank away from the cavalry and towards the weaker flanks.

  1. How far does Somerset deserve his reputation as the Good Duke? (Somerset (then known ...

    he continuously debased the coins of the ordinary, spent much money on his own lavish property and funding a war that he seemed to have underestimated (both financially and skilfully - he realised the French Army was very strong), he refused to admit fault in his own policies, placing 'the

  2. The changing position of women and the suffrage question. Revision notes

    * After weeks of discussion the Speakers Conference submitted its report to Parliament, recommending that ?some measure of women suffrage should be conferred? on ?women who have attained a certain age?. (35 was suggested as a guideline) What had changed by 1916?

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work