• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

A WAR ECONOMY?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

A WAR ECONOMY? This may seem a slightly odd topic for a program on Nazi foreign policy. However, it is imperative to understand the degree to which Germany had prepared for war in 1939, especially given the comment in the Hossbach Memorandum that a large-scale European war should not be delayed beyond 1943. The preparedness or otherwise of Germany needs considering when interpreting the importance of foreign policy priorities and initiatives. In his famous memorandum of 4 September 1936 on Goering's Four Year Plan, Hitler set the Reich two goals: (i) The German armed forces were to be operational within four years; (ii) The German economy was to be ready for war within four years. These goals cannot be separated, and the development of a Wehrwirtschaft (or defence economy), which could avoid the difficulties faced in WW1, cannot but have influenced the pace and course of foreign policy making. Post-WW2 Marxist historians, like Eichholtz, have traditionally taken the view that Nazi foreign policy and war aims were decisively influenced by economic factors. The Mason thesis has taken up this idea, and argues that by 1939 Hitler was forced into launching his attack on Poland because of a domestic crisis caused by popular discontent at restricted living standards. ...read more.

Middle

Independent supply departments within the three armed services (eg the Army's Wi-R� Amst. under General Thomas, who loathed and sought to undermine Goering and his officials); and from March 1940... 3. An additional Ministry of Armaments and Munitions under Fritz Todt. Moreover... - Much of the rearmament programme for the German Luftwaffe and Navy was not designed to reach its peak until the mid-1940s - a date in accordance with Hitler's own foreign policy analysis in the Hossbach Memorandum. This helps to explain why Goering was so luke-warm about Germany making any moves against Czechoslovakia or Poland, which might lead to an outbreak of large-scale hostilities in 1938-39. - Hitler had underestimated the problems involved in converting the German economy into one geared to the needs of the military; Industrialists were loath to foresake the lucrative consumer markets for that of the military, and often it took the direct involvement of Goering's army of officials to force them to re-gear their plants. - There were many occasions where resistance from a leading Nazi to taking resources from a pet, prestige project hampered the drive towards a true 'defence economy'. eg Hitler's obsession with the motor-car and the road network meant that it was not until 1942 that Albert Speer was able to persuade him to halt even unnecessary repair work on the Autobahnen. ...read more.

Conclusion

Even Hitler was forced to concede on the eve of war (in a conversation with the League of Nations Commissioner in Danzig, Carl Burckhardt, on 11 August 1939: 'I need the Ukraine so that they cannot starve us out, as they did in the last war.' Nonetheless, Hitler asserted his confidence in Germany's economic ability: 1. To finance a long war Hitler believed that the age-old adage about States being unable to bear the cost of prolonged warfare was erroneous. In a speech to military commanders in May 1939 he argued that the only threat to a modern Power's ability to cope with the demands of prolonged war was the quick destruction of its major industrial regions (eg the Ruhr); 2. To withstand an enemy blockade In his last-minute address to military commanders on 22 August 1939 Hitler claimed not to be even expecting such an eventuality, which would be ineffective anyway: 'because of our autarky and because we have supply sources in Eastern Europe.... There is no need for us to be afraid of a blockade. We will be supplied by grain, livestock, coal, lead and zinc from the east.' In other words, the profits of conquest in the East, in terms of both land and mineral resources would adequately compensate for any weaknesses that were still evident in the German economy at the outbreak of war. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Causes of show trials + purges of 1930s.

    correct by instigating a number of reforms which were motivated by a desire to strengthen the autocracy. Alexander II marked the opening of a period of reform in Russian politics and social issues, in which such reforms were to have implications for the future of Russia.

  2. Vietnam war

    Americans: * Americans never really learned to fight a counterinsurgency war and used force in largely traditional ways. * Lansdale: "One fought battles to influence opinions in Vietnam and in the world, the other fought battles to finish the enemy keeping tabs on body counts."

  1. Hitlers Germany

    A cynical opportunist and shrewd realist, Goebbels switched to Hitler's side in 1926 and was rewarded with the position of Gauleiter of Berlin. His tremendous success in Berlin, achieved through the brilliant use of propaganda and his oratory (many thought he was as good an orator as Hitler), brought a

  2. Propaganda in WW1

    which was also used to advertise and promote a range of events such as silent movies. The messages were often bold and immediate to catch people's attention, and they tended to promote a single message. They used text in combination with a visual image to appeal to a broader audience.

  1. Did the Nazi arms economy make war an economic necessity?

    The fruits of the `Reinhardt Plan' of September 1933 and of the `recovery' period of the German economy were tangible and widespread: employment was boosted through the stimulation of demand, the business cycle was revived, investment encouraged through tax concessions and subsidies, and public works schemes created the Autobahnen as well as other roads, canals, and office buildings [5].

  2. Why was the league so ineffective in dealing with the Abyssinian Crisis?

    These "talks" were then leaked to the press. So everyone knew that the British and French and the league were ready to just give in and give the aggressors what they wanted. With this the Italians then fully invaded Abyssinia and the league do nothing to stop it as the two main powers didn't want too provoke the Italians.

  1. Why was the league so ineffective in dealing with the Abyssinian Crisis?

    They even let Italy use the Suez Canal to supply their army; they could have closed it which would probably have stopped the Italian invasion outright. Secretly Britain and France agreed a plan that they thought would bring the invasion to an end.

  2. Evaluate the Nazis economic policies from 1933 - 1939. To what extent were the ...

    For instance, the Nazis leaders still applied the Reich Labor Service (Reichsarbeitsdienst) created in 1931 to give military training in advance of actual army service5. All of these gave an immediate improvement on the labor market and a relief to all German citizens.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work