• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Assess the reasons why Stalin was in dispute with his wartime allies from 1941-45

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Assess the reasons why Stalin was in dispute with his wartime Allies from 1941 to 1945. The Grand Alliance, also known as the Anti-Hitler Coalition, had one main aim-to defeat Hitler. When the completion of this goal was imminent, the wartime Allies were beginning to discuss the post war settlements, on which they had difficulties agreeing. There are many debates as to why these disputes arose, such as whether it was Stalin being too aggressive, or the USA being too selfish, or just the product of misunderstandings and ideological differences. The first view that Stalin was aggressive and expansionist, and his untrustworthiness was the main reason the wartime Alliance experienced disputes, has plenty of evidence to support it. One of the issues that arose during the post war settlements was Poland. At Yalta, the Allies had agreed on free elections in Poland, but Stalin failed to make these promises a reality. Orthodox historians would argue that this was because Stalin wanted Poland to have a pro-Soviet government, and therefore did want any aspects of a democracy introduced there. This view would be supported by the fact that in 1945 and 1946, pro-Soviet communist governments were set up in both Romania and Bulgaria and any opposition was strongly suppressed, and the establishment of the Lublin Committee in Poland in 1944. ...read more.

Middle

With 25 million left homeless, and losses in farms and factories amounting to a third of the countries wealth, Stalin felt that the Soviet Union deserved compensation, in the form of all the territories he'd gained. This desire for security would have been easier to understand for the Americans had Stalin informed them of the scale of the damage inflicted by the Nazi's. As the Americans were actually unaware of the losses suffered by the Soviet, it was perhaps unfair for Stalin to expect them to allow him compensation for it. Although it may have been mainly Stalin's fault there was a misunderstanding, America cannot be rid of all blame, and it can even be argued that America caused some of the disputes. Evidence to support this argument can be found in the failure to open the Second Front. One of the main reasons Russia suffered so much during the Second World War, the Second Front was an issue of great tension between the Allies. Roosevelt originally promised Stalin a second front by 1942, but was advised against this by his military advisors, and so postponed it until 1943. ...read more.

Conclusion

Whilst the issue of the Second Front may have increased mistrust between the Allies, it is undeniable that there was a large mistrust between the two already, based purely on ideological differences between Marxism-Leninism and the Capitalist and liberal democracies of America and Britain. This level of mistrust is shown early on in the Manhattan Project to build the atomic bomb that was later dropped on Japan. The Americans didn't trust the Russians enough to inform them of the bomb, but at the same time, Stalin had a large network of spies operating in America. This suggests that the disputes were caused by a fundamental problem of mistrust within the Alliance, and therefore lends support to the post-revisionist view adopted by many more recent historians. In conclusion, Stalin was in dispute with his wartime Allies from 1941 to 1945 mainly due to the inevitable mistrust between the leaders, causing each country to act selfishly and aggressively, for fear of betrayal from the other side. Whilst there is evidence to support the view that Stalin was aggressive, there is also evidence for America's aggression, yet both acts of aggression can be explained through the lack of trust, born from the ideological differences of the countries. ?? ?? ?? ?? Ellen Smyth ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Assess the view that Stalins suspicions of his western allies between 1941 and 1945 ...

    4 star(s)

    U.S losses included 62,000 casualties, 12,500 of whom were either killed or missing. Historian Robert Wolfson strongly challenges Lightbody's view with his argument that the complex preparations needed for the D-Day Landings of June 1944 show that the Second Front could not have been launched any sooner.

  2. Causes of show trials + purges of 1930s.

    He wanted to do this in five years. He called it the five year plan. This was an almost impossible task as most countries have gradually become industrialized after about 50 years. The plan worked but at the great cost of human lives. Anyone that thought the plan wouldn't work and thought that it was a waste of money was dealt with by the police.

  1. Stalins leadership was the most significant reason for the Soviet victory over Germany in ...

    of our military and cultural forces' (the new Patriarch in November 1942) proving that people of the church and others at the time did look up to Stalin and had a real belief in his regime and it was him that led them to commit to the war-effort.

  2. Russia and the Soviet Union 1917-1924

    some different aims, some of them wanted to tsar back, some a military Dictator; others wanted revolutionary change. The only aim they had been in common was to defeat the Bolsheviks; they only agreed on little less. Leadership and unity Reds * Leader wise the reds had a great one, Trotsky.

  1. Assess the relative importance of the reasons why the July 1944 Bomb Plot to ...

    This supports Olbricht's failure to take initiative which is essential for any chance of success in such circumstances, Hence the second condition failed too. Even von Stauffenberg's energy and determination, however, could not make the three to four hours that had been lost during the three-hour flight from Rastenberg to Berlin.

  2. Russia 1905 - 1941

    Asses the impact that Lenin had on Russia and the Russian people. During his life Lenin did many things to Russia, some for better, some for worse. In this question I will try to explain the impact of Lenin on the Russia and the Russian people.

  1. Can historical parallels be drawn between democracies and dictatorships?

    Alexander was throned at the age of 20 after his father, Philip II, king of Macedonia, was assassinated in 336 BC. He had already showed his capabilities as a ruler at the age of 16 when he was left in charge of Macedonia as regent, with the power to rule

  2. The Impact of Stalins Leadership in the USSR, 1924 1941. Extensive notes

    and the standard of living improved, with consumer rationing abolished in 1935. 1937-41: Economic policy was focussed on rearmament, but was affected adversely by the terror. People had more money to spend, but fewer things to spend it on. The First Five Year Plan, 1928-32: Such good progress was made

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work