• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Assess the reasons why Stalin was in dispute with his wartime allies from 1941-45

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Assess the reasons why Stalin was in dispute with his wartime Allies from 1941 to 1945. The Grand Alliance, also known as the Anti-Hitler Coalition, had one main aim-to defeat Hitler. When the completion of this goal was imminent, the wartime Allies were beginning to discuss the post war settlements, on which they had difficulties agreeing. There are many debates as to why these disputes arose, such as whether it was Stalin being too aggressive, or the USA being too selfish, or just the product of misunderstandings and ideological differences. The first view that Stalin was aggressive and expansionist, and his untrustworthiness was the main reason the wartime Alliance experienced disputes, has plenty of evidence to support it. One of the issues that arose during the post war settlements was Poland. At Yalta, the Allies had agreed on free elections in Poland, but Stalin failed to make these promises a reality. Orthodox historians would argue that this was because Stalin wanted Poland to have a pro-Soviet government, and therefore did want any aspects of a democracy introduced there. This view would be supported by the fact that in 1945 and 1946, pro-Soviet communist governments were set up in both Romania and Bulgaria and any opposition was strongly suppressed, and the establishment of the Lublin Committee in Poland in 1944. ...read more.

Middle

With 25 million left homeless, and losses in farms and factories amounting to a third of the countries wealth, Stalin felt that the Soviet Union deserved compensation, in the form of all the territories he'd gained. This desire for security would have been easier to understand for the Americans had Stalin informed them of the scale of the damage inflicted by the Nazi's. As the Americans were actually unaware of the losses suffered by the Soviet, it was perhaps unfair for Stalin to expect them to allow him compensation for it. Although it may have been mainly Stalin's fault there was a misunderstanding, America cannot be rid of all blame, and it can even be argued that America caused some of the disputes. Evidence to support this argument can be found in the failure to open the Second Front. One of the main reasons Russia suffered so much during the Second World War, the Second Front was an issue of great tension between the Allies. Roosevelt originally promised Stalin a second front by 1942, but was advised against this by his military advisors, and so postponed it until 1943. ...read more.

Conclusion

Whilst the issue of the Second Front may have increased mistrust between the Allies, it is undeniable that there was a large mistrust between the two already, based purely on ideological differences between Marxism-Leninism and the Capitalist and liberal democracies of America and Britain. This level of mistrust is shown early on in the Manhattan Project to build the atomic bomb that was later dropped on Japan. The Americans didn't trust the Russians enough to inform them of the bomb, but at the same time, Stalin had a large network of spies operating in America. This suggests that the disputes were caused by a fundamental problem of mistrust within the Alliance, and therefore lends support to the post-revisionist view adopted by many more recent historians. In conclusion, Stalin was in dispute with his wartime Allies from 1941 to 1945 mainly due to the inevitable mistrust between the leaders, causing each country to act selfishly and aggressively, for fear of betrayal from the other side. Whilst there is evidence to support the view that Stalin was aggressive, there is also evidence for America's aggression, yet both acts of aggression can be explained through the lack of trust, born from the ideological differences of the countries. ?? ?? ?? ?? Ellen Smyth ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Assess the view that Stalins suspicions of his western allies between 1941 and 1945 ...

    4 star(s)

    U.S losses included 62,000 casualties, 12,500 of whom were either killed or missing. Historian Robert Wolfson strongly challenges Lightbody's view with his argument that the complex preparations needed for the D-Day Landings of June 1944 show that the Second Front could not have been launched any sooner.

  2. Stalins leadership was the most significant reason for the Soviet victory over Germany in ...

    However much Stalin did for the actual victory of Russia is not really known but the terrible circumstances the people of Russia faced created a new bond with their leader and Stalin himself became the personification of victory. The Russian people or certainly many of them saw him as a

  1. Causes of show trials + purges of 1930s.

    Now that the threat of counter-revolution was real and tangible it can be seen as giving great weight to the argument of armed insurrection to get to Soviet state that the masses and the Bolshevik party wanted. This insurrection came to fruition in October and meant that the dual power system was finished when the Bolshevik party took over.

  2. Russia and the Soviet Union 1917-1924

    They did not like the idea that making a profit was the main 'power source' for smaller industries. They disliked stuff like the fact that the bosses of factories or Kulaks (rich peasants) could hire men to work for them.

  1. Russia 1905 - 1941

    The effect of the NEP was a great success, the amount of grain collected between 1922 and 1926 rose from 50.3 tons to 76.8 tons. Not only that but the amount of iron produced grew incredibly from 0.2 tons to 2.4 tons.

  2. Discuss the claim that Stalin(TM)s actions in Eastern Europe during 1944 and 1945 were ...

    These terms were actually agreed at Potsdam in ... By assenting to the Polish Boundary in the East the Western Allies fashioned a condition which no independent Polish government could acknowledge thus producing the perfect opportunity for Stalin to establish his own puppet Government, gaining more control over Poland.

  1. Assess the relative importance of the reasons why the July 1944 Bomb Plot to ...

    This supports Olbricht's failure to take initiative which is essential for any chance of success in such circumstances, Hence the second condition failed too. Even von Stauffenberg's energy and determination, however, could not make the three to four hours that had been lost during the three-hour flight from Rastenberg to Berlin.

  2. The Impact of Stalins Leadership in the USSR, 1924 1941. Extensive notes

    from 1933 onwards, grain output was measured in ‘biological yield’, the maximum possible yield as the grain stood in the fields. USSR claimed to have achieved Socialism as a result of the 1930s industrialisation. This was because by Soviet definition, Socialism meant ‘social’ ownership of the means of production ï

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work