• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Assess to what extent was Louis XIVs foreign policy less successful after 1684.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Assess to what extent was Louis XIV's foreign policy less successful after 1684. Up to 1684, Louis XIV's foreign policy had allowed him to acquire strategically important territory which made France more secure. In doing so, he also defended the reputation of the House of Bourbon on the battlefield and thus increased its gloire. However after 1684, his foreign policy enjoyed less success due to a combination of factors. The latter half of Louis' reign was marked by two major wars: the Nine Years War and the War of Spanish Succession. Both of these wars emphasized a decline in France after its peak in 1684. For instance, the results of the Nine Years War suggest that France had clearly lost most of the territory gained at the Treaty of Nymegen in 1678. Meanwhile, the War of Spanish Succession did not result in as much success as Louis' previous wars. This indicates a less successful foreign policy after 1684. In terms of territory, Louis' only real gain was Spain from the War of Spanish Succession. On the other hand, Louis surrendered all possessions gained since Nymegen, with the exception of Strasbourg, such as Trier, Breisach, Philippsburg and most of Lorraine. ...read more.

Middle

The Dutch opposed him because he had fought them in the Dutch War, which resulted in sever disruption to Dutch trade. German Princes opposed him because Louis had taken land from them via the Policy of Reunion. Leopold also wanted revenge because Louis had "illegally" seized Strasbourg. Compared to the beginning of Louis' reign, the European balance of power has shifted against France; whereas before there was disunity in Europe, now Europe was unified in hatred of France. This unity is very important because it shifts the balance of power against France. Whereas in previous wars France was able to isolate enemies, now she had to fight against the whole of Europe. Previous wars had used up France's resources. Even by 1680 France was already in debt. On the other hand, her enemies enjoyed better provisions for finance, for example the William III was able to borrow money at low rates from of interest from the Bank of England. The minister and generals in the latter part of the reign did not have the same standard as at the beginning. This is particularly true of the army; Villeroi and Villars were mere shadows of their predecessors. ...read more.

Conclusion

Some reasons are more than important than others; for example, the hatred of France from the Policy of Reunion drove other nations together against France and so the power vacuum, which was there at the beginning of the reign, disappeared. However, ultimately it was the combination of these reasons which caused French foreign policy to be less successful following 1688. Unity in Europe alone wouldn't have stopped French aggression. Similarly loss of French resources alone wouldn't have had as much effect had Europe been in disarray. In conclusion, the foreign policy in the latter half of Louis' reign was clearly less successful than pre-1684. In terms of achievements she had secured her status in Europe by acquiring the Spanish Succession, which ensured that she was no longer surrounded by Hapsburgs; Louis had built a Bourbon base in Western Europe which would secure and strengthen both France and Spain. He also left behind a legacy of unprecedented French supremacy during which France was arguably the most powerful country in the world. However, there were failures from his foreign policy as well. The North-Eastern and Eastern frontiers was yet again weakened by the loss of lands which he had worked so hard to acquire before 1684. Furthermore, he left his successor with a Europe united in hatred of France who wanted to curb French power and hegemony. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Other Historical Periods section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Other Historical Periods essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    To what extent was warfare between Britain and France the main contributory factor in ...

    3 star(s)

    Frances dominance over Europe was starting to fade, but it took until 1701 in the War of the Spanish Succession for Frances downward spiral to really pick up speed. The War of the Spanish Succession started in 1701 with disputes over Phillip V of Spain succeeding Charles II as the King of Spain.

  2. To what extent was the Dutch Revolt in 1572 primarily caused by Religion?

    he had no intention of keeping traditional policies like the nobles wished, but instead wanted to pursue a stronger policy against heresy. His absence was significant; between October 1555 and August 1559 Philip spent all but three months in the Netherlands and was fully aware of the instability there, yet never returned.

  1. Assess the political, social and cultural significance of Versailles in the reign of Louis ...

    For instance, to attend the king in the first intimate moments of the day, to see him rubbed down with rose water and spirits of wine, shaved and dressed was the privilege of the highest in the land. This centralization of government strengthened the position of the monarch because it

  2. Explain how Philip II became King of Portugal in 1581. Although Philip II devoted ...

    When Henry announced his conversion to Catholicism Philip made the fatal mistake of continuing to attempt to change the succession. This move united the French people behind Henry and he joined England and the United Provinces in wars against Philip.

  1. To what extent were Mussolini's economic policies successful in the years 1922-40?

    This was only a minor success as while Mussolini managed to peg the value of the Lira at 90 Lira to the pound, gaining some prestige within the Italian public and foreign banks, the immediate knock-on effect was significant; exports fell significantly as prices increased for foreign buyers, and unemployment eventually trebled by 1928.

  2. To what extent could the Crusades be described as failure within the years 1095-1195?

    There was lack of ships as too many people wanted to go, and so it was decided to go by land despite the fact that the path was not easy. Agreements with Balkan states were signed to have a free pass through their lands.

  1. Despite frequent changes in policy, Russian and Soviet governments were spectacularly unsuccessful in securing ...

    However, the tertiary sector also contributed to the economy. Although some historians critique Russia?s dependence of Western investors, these ties had corresponding benefits in the shape of trade. [13] Business also boomed within Russia with eight large banks emerging in 1899 which owned more than half the total bank capital.

  2. To What Extent Does History show that there is no such thing as absolute ...

    This is further supported in 1070 when the newly elected Barons began to quarrel and over-taxed and bullied the defeated Saxons. This provoked a revolt, depicting an image that the Saxons didn?t like or agree to Williams forced reign over the English.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work