• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Britain and the First World War, 1914-1918 Sources Questions

Extracts from this document...


BRITAIN AND THE FIRST WORLD WAR, 1914-1918 1) The posters shown in sources A and B were published before 1916 and the poster shown in source C was published after 1916. We know this because the poster in source C was published by the American government and the U.S.A. did not join the war until 1917. We also know that sources A and B were published before 1916 as the posters, published by the British government, are recruiting volunteers and volunteers only. The term conscription means being forced to fight for your country. Conscription was only introduced in Britain in 1916 so the posters in source A and B must have been produced before 1916. 2) Sources A, B and C have many similarities and differences: Firstly, all the posters are source of propaganda. Secondly, they are all posters for the allied forces that give a swift message, encouraging people to fight for their country. Sources A and B do not make any explicit reference to Germany or her allies; source C does and tells Americans to "destroy this mad brute", referring to the picture of the vicious gorilla. Sources A and B are emotional blackmail whereas source C is more dramatic. In sources A and B we can see clear signs of emotional blackmail. This is making whoever is reading it think as though it is his "duty to fight" and makes him feel a certain amount of guilt if he doesn't. ...read more.


Because of this and the fact that the language he employs is emotive and poetic the image of war may be depicted with more horror and description. As Siegfried Sassoon, who writes the passage, strongly detests war, the passage will be highly bias. All together, the two sources give different impressions of what the conditions of the trenches are like because they were used for different purposes: source I used the nations patriotism to sell a product, whereas source J describes the conditions of the trenches so horribly because the writer hates war and wants other people to be shocked into hating it too. 7a) Sources E, F and G are not at all reliable as they purposefully give people at home the wrong impression of what life in the trenches was like. Source E shows a postcard that soldiers were allowed to send home to family and friends. It is very restrictive in what they can say, with it in fact being more of a multiple choice type card. This would have been because the British government did not want anyone at home to know the true reality of the conditions in the trenches, in order to maintain high spirits. The same is true of source F. The picture shows the East Surrey Regiment playing football in No Mans land. This could not be further from the truth, yet people at home would believe it. ...read more.


The government would not let the public know the reality of war and would only give them exaggerated good points and no bad points to keep moral high. That is why I agree with the statement: "The British government did everything it could to mislead the British public about what it was really like in the trenches." 9) I believe that a historian writing about the trenches in 1918 would have produced a different account to a historian writing on the same topic today. Sources A, B and C all give the impression that war was a good thing. Source E shows all the reality of war a historian at that time would have to go on. Articles in the newspaper, shown in sources F and G are all a historian would have to write about. These articles are of course not giving the whole picture and exaggerating the good points. Sources H and J are real accounts of what war was actually like. However these were written many years after the war and would therefore be no use to a historian in 1918. As the press were not allowed to print any article on the reality of war such as 'Dulce et Decorum est' by Wilfred Owen, and the government were misleading everyone, a historian in 1918 would have as much genuine information as the public, which is not a lot. Because of this, a historian writing today, who had all the information, would write a different account to a historian writing in 1918 who had inaccurate information. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. Why did tension increase in Europe between 1900 and 1914?

    reached an agreement on arms limitation, but the talks only dealt with strategic weapons, long-range nuclear weapons. They did not cover multiple warhead missiles or battlefield weapons (tactical nuclear weapons). In fact the USA continued to produce multiple warheads, at the rate of three a day, throughout the 1970s.

  2. Assessing the impact of the first world war on international relations in the decade ...

    This agreement was greeted with wild enthusiasm all over Europe and the reconciliation between France and Germany was referred to as the "Locarno honeymoon"( )The most significant feature of the Locarno agreements was the spirit of hope they had awakened in Europe.

  1. Assess the effectiveness of the governments in Britain and Germany in maintaining the war ...

    will shortly be controlled" This shows the Departments focused on war materials, rather than food resources. Secondly, due to coal shortages, food which was produced within Germany, could not be transported to the areas which needed it. Britain however, had much more success in making use of what it had in order to overcome its shortages.

  2. Newton D. Baker, "The Treatment of German-Americans" (1918)

    Many attempts were made to prevent the annexation of the Philippines; however, these attempts failed. No one expected a war with the Filipinos, especially guerrilla warfare. After three years of fighting the war was finally over. The Filipinos were defeated!

  1. Why did Germany lose the First World War in 1918?

    It did not work because the Allies attacked from the West just when the Germans were trying to win on the Eastern front. This left shortages of men and they were unable to cope with the attack and this was the breaking point for the army.

  2. Total War, Britain during the Second World War

    bath, no unnecessary journeys, either by car or by train were among the requests made by the government. Entertainment To help support the British people in the long years of the war, the government tried to provide entertainment for boosting morale.

  1. American History.

    - For the colonies, the war had (1) united them against a common enemy for the first time and (2) created anger against the British, who were viewed as overly harsh commanders who had distain for the colonists. - The end of the war also led to another key event.

  2. Vietnam Coursework Sources Questions

    This made the soldiers terrified to move around the jungle as a Viet Cong trap could be lurking anywhere. The Viet Cong had a series of underground tunnels they could escape into if they were ever pursued making it very difficult for the Americans to locate and kill any of them.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work