• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Describe the stages in 1642 by which England slipped into civil war

Extracts from this document...


Describe the stages in 1642 by which England slipped into civil war In the years preceding 1642 Charles 1st had managed to restore much of the support that he had lost during the '11 year tyranny'. Members of parliament began to think Pym had done enough and that his shocking revolutionary reforms were going too far; the 'Grand Remonstrance' had only passed by the narrowest of margins, a few more votes and it would not have passed. Despite this England fell into a state of civil war on 22nd August 1642 - Charles' radical, ill-advised moves led to many of his former supporters once again turning to parliament, having lost faith in the strong leader they used to favour. Charles' advisors and catholic wife Henrietta Maria had encouraged Charles to make a stance against Pym and his increasingly radical parliamentary policies. ...read more.


This physical distance made it almost impossible for the 2 sides to communicate effectively. In February Charles also sent his wife back to the continent to raise an army and pawn the crown jewels for money that could be spent on armaments. This signified the final step in the communications break down and any settlement would be a lot harder now the king feared war so much he had sent his wife abroad. Charles began to prepare for war; he attempted to secure the arsenal at Hull, a large cache of weaponry that had been placed there in anticipation of campaigns against Scotland. Hull was also a bristling port and would allow any troops or supplies his wife could obtain to be landed and secured without having to go through the English channel to get to the west cost of England. ...read more.


This generated more anger between the 2 sides. The king issued a reply to parliament a few days later signifying he did not agree with the propositions. Final attempts at communication had failed. Towns began to pledge their allegiance to either side or try and avoid the war, the navy sided with parliament and the king finally raised his standard in Nottingham on the 22nd of August 1642. England reached a point where civil war was possible when after a series of blunders, Charles lost enough support for the commons to be split equally in favour of him and parliament. Without such a close split civil war would have been impossible. Once the king left London communications broke down, coaxing the king back into London would be difficult without humiliating him and war seemed to be almost inevitable. Once the sides were armed war could not be avoided, the 2 sides would fight now they were armed. This was proved when attempts of peace such as the 19 propositions failed. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics essays

  1. Why did the civil war break out in 1642?

    Worst of all for Charles, his most able minister, the Earl of Strafford, was put on trial by Parliament and executed for treason. Archbishop Laud was imprisoned. Up until 1641, Parliament had been united against the King but now it began to split.

  2. The roles and leadership of Charles Stuart and John Pym in the English Civil ...

    So how did Charles act, believing he was not to become King? According to Charles Carlton3 Charles tried to protect himself by being submissive, something which is very rare in an heir, he became withdrawn and always seeking affection. So this was the attitude that Charles felt was appropriate, as

  1. What was the most significant cause of civil strife in England from 1455-61?

    However it does seem that Henry's own irresolution and negligence allowed the development of minor disagreements and transformed bastard feudalism from a vaguely interesting sideshow into an effective and useful weapon for any prospective troublemakers. The most notable of these is quite obviously Richard Duke of York and although there


    Religion paid a bigger part in people's lives during this period so when Charles tried to change the Church it was always going to cause distrust between parliament and the King. Money was closely tied in with what had happened throughout Charles' reign.

  1. Why did Civil war break out in 1642?

    For a king to pass on new laws, he had to pass them on through Parliament. Between 1629 and 1640 King Charles ruled without Parliament's help at all. During this period of eleven years there was a conflict of interests.

  2. Why did Civil War break out in 1642?

    The role of the individual should not be overlooked however, as the revisionist historians suggest, the actions of single people are key in the breakout of war. Charles I's aspiration for 'Personal Rule' was he intending to retake control after he had dealt with the Scots?

  1. In August 1642 the Civil War began, it was between Parliament and the King ...

    But most Scots were strong Protestants. So it didn't go down very well. The Scots refused and then rebelled. They formed an army, and in 1640 they marched into England, and made demands on Charles. This is a promise made by Scottish people in 1638: " We promise and declare

  2. Describe the stages in 1642 by which England slipped into civil war

    This is a key stage in England's slide into war as it created more anger against the King, alienating him from the MPs.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work