• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Discuss the idea that Shakespeare presents Henry as an ideal king for the Tudor age, but subsequent audiences may interpret him rather differently. How do you respond to Shakespeare's Henry?

Extracts from this document...


Henry V Coursework Discuss the idea that Shakespeare presents Henry as an ideal king for the Tudor age, but subsequent audiences may interpret him rather differently. How do you respond to Shakespeare's Henry? The Tudors perceived their ideal king as strong powerful and decisive. A king that could defend the country and lead the armies into battle. Shakespeare described his ideal king in Macbeth as having: "The king-becoming graces, As justice, verity, temp'rance, stableness, Bounty, perseverance, mercy, lowliness, Devotion, patience, courage, fortitude." In order for the character of Henry to be popular, regal and a king of his time, it was important, that Shakespeare portrayed him as a great leader of his country. Shakespeare presented Henry as a strong, magnificent and admired leader of the armies and ruler of England. In the play our first impressions of Henry are just this. The Chorus describes him as "war-like Harry", giving the audience a strong first impression. The Churchmen reinforce this impression when describing Henry's reformation from an immature boy with uneducated companions, to a man with morals, piety and a sense of justice. Throughout the play Shakespeare builds upon Henry's character. Shakespeare makes use of the Chorus to present Henry to the audience as if he were Mars, the God of War. ...read more.


This image illustrates that Henry is the 'strawberry' and has developed into a better king after growing under the shadow of nettles. Shakespeare is contrasting Henry's past and present, so the audience believes him to be an even greater king. As the audience can see the huge contrast between his past wildness and the good leadership qualities he now possesses. This is illustrated by his reaction to the Dauphin's insult. He does not allow himself to show anger but speaks with composure and irony saying: "We are glad the Dauphin is so pleasant with us." Shakespeare illustrates that Henry believes in justice and honesty. He proves that he is a good leader when he condemns his own friend Bardolph. When he hears of Bardolph stealing from a church, he puts aside his personal feelings and does his duty, beheading his friend to uphold justice. Shakespeare presents Henry as a moral and honest man; Henry asks the churchmen about his claim to the French throne, saying: "May I with right and conscience make this claim?" Some believe Henry wants a clear conscience because he is an honest man. Arguably he doesn't want to lose the war and the confidence of his people and therefore wants an acceptable reason to go to war with France. ...read more.


The Branagh film uses this scene to make Henry seem more human and a vulnerable man with emotions. I believe that the two films are both good versions of Shakespeare's "Henry V", each appealing to the audiences of its own date. However, I believe that the Olivier version is more "correct" in portraying Henry in the way that Shakespeare would want him to be presented to his Tudor audience, but the Branagh film in my opinion is a more convincing account of Henry as a human being. When reading the play during a war I believe that a modern audience would want to have a strong, decisive, honest leader. But they would still want the leader to have good morals and be portrayed as an ordinary man. Modern audiences like to see and understand the moral issues, difficult decisions and inner turmoil whereas Tudor audiences would no doubt prefer the strength, poser and decisive monarch. There are major differences between the impact of the film versions of "Henry V" and reading the play. When watching "Henry V", on stage or on film the audience can see the actors and can see their reactions and emotions better than some readers can visualize it. The Tudor audiences would have had high expectations of their king. Henry is portrayed as a strong glorious, warrior king, who is a great ruler of England. Lauren Mayer 6A Bury Grammar School (Girls) 33221 - 1 - ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics essays

  1. What kind of king does Shakespeare create in Act 3 Scenes 1 and 2? ...

    Shakespeare continues to refer to the characteristics of the tiger: "Disguise fair nature with hard-favoured rage," by asking his troops to disguise how nice they are and to bring forward rage like the tiger Henry is coming across as motivating to his men to be ruthless, cunning and strong in times of war.

  2. Hisotyr Coursework

    There was also again continued pressure from the radicals such as Joseph Chamberlain and Charles Dilke, it is said that together they both launched a national campaign to revive the flagging spirit of radicalism. This is clearly public pressure as they both tried to rally the public to swing their support behind them.

  1. arctic story

    "No, I was answering another question," "Well I did not ask you any other question," "No, that's right I was doing a check list of all the things that I had in my bag, and I did not have my binoculars," he answered "Right, anyway, what is this place like

  2. Shakespeare Portrays Henry V as the Model Monarch

    to fight and kill each other but they are both too cowardly to do anything. Also we learn that an old drinking companion of the King, Sir John Falstaff is ill. At Southampton, King Henry exposes the traitors, Lord Scroop, Grey of Northumberland & Richard Earl of Cambridge, who actually

  1. Examine how Ackroyd presents ideas of originality in the novel 'Chatterton'.

    Again and again, the detective tries to reconstruct the timing of the killings which in this case seem to be a futile task because there are no fixed points from which to associate events. The first of these consists of Chatterton's short but important life and uses late eighteenth century

  2. Analyse the ways in which Shakespeare dramatises his exploration of the idea of leadership ...

    They wondered whether he was suitable for the highest royal office. Another concern of the public was that he was estranged from his father. They did not know how he was going to cope being King without his father teaching him anything on how to be a good King.

  1. Economic and social issues were the main cause of Tudor Rebellion in Tudor England. ...

    their influence in the government in the northern counties and increase their financial and political fortunes. To finish, Essex?s rebellion was a weak revolt against Elizabeth and Robert Cecil. Essex?s revolt was his last attempt to restore his influence after his humiliating defeat and barging in to Elizabeth?s bedchamber without her permission.

  2. Wives & War: To what extent did these two aspects undermine Henry VIIIs rule ...

    Visibly Katherine was a pawn sent by the courtiers of the ?Howard family? to grab Henry?s affections to create rewards and benefits for the family such as for the Duke of Norfolk, this indeed was no unusual sort of behaviour for people in court (Ives 2007, pg 79)

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work