• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Discuss the relationship between Richard II and its source 'How kyng Richarde the seconde....'

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

AA306 - TMA 02 Discuss the relationship between Richard II and its source 'How kyng Richarde the seconde....' (Reader, pp. 6-9). The relationship between Richard II and The Myrroure for Magistrates is considered here predominantly in the context of the differences between the two texts.1 The function of each text is discussed initially, the didactic purpose of the Myrroure contrasted with the function of Shakespeare's play as, primarily, theatrical entertainment. The conflicting accounts of certain events from Richard's reign are looked at subsequently and the manner in which they reflect the different function of the texts. Finally, consideration is given to the different way in which the Myrroure and Richard II each reflect upon the theme of kingship through their portrayal of Richard's reign. In relation to each of these points of discussion, it is argued that Richard II delivers a more complex, multi-dimensional portrayal of character, events and themes than the Myrroure. The Myrroure is imbued with moral didacticism and Richard II's reign is employed to encourage rulers to govern virtuously and lawfully. Rulers must abide by 'right' and 'lawe' (l. 32), observe 'faythful counsayle' (ll. 35) and beware 'false Flatterers' (l. 33). Richard, however, is portrayed as a king who 'ruled all by lust' (l.31), 'passing not a straw' (l. ...read more.

Middle

An example is the description of Worcester's abandonment of Richard in the Myrroure, when he 'did... / Bebreake his staff, my houselhold stay/Bad eche man shifte and rode him selfe away' (ll.75-77) while in Richard II Bushy informs the Queen that 'Worcester / Hath broke his staff, resigned his stewardship / And all the household servants fled with him' (2.2.58-60). In the Myrroure, Richard describes how he surrounded himself with 'false Flatterers' (l.33) and 'gaping Gulles' (l.52), an aspect of Richard's rule highlighted in Richard II; Gaunt declares to the king that 'A thousand flatterers sit within thy crown' (2.1.100). Similarities extend to the use of imagery, Richard acknowledging in the Myrroure that 'Three meals a day could scarce content my mawe' (l.39), Gaunt declaring the danger of such avarice, for 'With eager feeding food doth choke the feeder' (2.1.37). However, Richard II and the Myrroure also differ in the presentation of events, particularly those relating to Richard's deposition. The Myrroure treats Richard's actual fall from power in cursory fashion, Richard complaining that 'Henryes pride / Dyd cause me yeld him up my crowne and throne.' (ll.85-6). Shakespeare, by contrast, presents the events leading up to Henry's deposition as more complex, contrasting Richard's apparent resignation of power with the suggestion that he struggles to do so. ...read more.

Conclusion

Yet Shakespeare also undermines this argument. Gaunt, one of the principal advocates of automatic allegiance to the king, dies abusing him roundly. As the king's position appears increasingly tenuous, York declares his neutrality and subsequently manages to justify Richard's deposition as the will of heaven, in doing so making the notion of an anointed king meaningless for it argues that an attempt to remove a king is the will of heaven if successful, treason if not: But heaven hath a hand in these events, To whose high will we bend our calm contents. To Bolingbroke are we sworn subjects now. (5.2.37-39) Conversely, and finally, the fact that Richard appears to voluntarily rescind can suggest that his deposition is indeed the will of heaven, his actions being God's will exercised through him. The two-dimensional approach to the theme of kingship contributes to the complexity of Richard II and it is this complexity which differentiates it from the Myrroure. The principal function of the latter is as a didactic text, its one-dimensional portrayal of character, historical events and the nature of kingship contributing to its didacticism. Richard II, in contrast, employs the same tools to provide for theatrical entertainment and also possibly reflects Shakespeare's ambiguous stance towards the events of Richard's reign, his person, and contemporary debates regarding the extent of a monarch's power. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics essays

  1. Does Alexander II deserve the title of 'Tsar liberator'?

    The first notable detail of the zemstvos is that they were selected local assemblies, and all classes could vote for zemstva members. This meant that more power was awarded to the Mir, and local problems were dealt with much more effectively.

  2. What kind of king does Shakespeare create in Act 3 Scenes 1 and 2? ...

    In latter scenes, our impressions of Henry do not change, scenes such as Act 4 Scene 1 were Henry tours his camp in disguise compound our impressions of him as a good king. In Act 4 Scene1 we see the private man Henry, he wants his soldiers to think that

  1. Henry II (1154 - 1189) is generally seen as the main catalyst in the ...

    2 BBC -History- Monarchs and Leaders The Character and Legacy of Henry II ' by Dr Mike Ibeji pages 1-2 http://www.bbc.co.uk/cgibin/history/renderplain.pl?file=/history/state/monarchs_lead... [Visited 17/12/2002] 3 Britain Express, 'Stephen and Maud -The Civil war in England in the early 12th century', http://www.britainexpress.com/History/Stephen_and _Maud.htm [Visited 16/12/2002] 4 Dr Mike Ibeji BBC History -Monarchs

  2. Discuss Shakespeare's presentation of women in Richard III. Are they convincing characters?

    At this point, Lady Anne absolutely loathes Richard. It is ironic that she agrees to marry him knowing at some point she'll be killed. It also suggests that her curse is somewhat false. The purpose of this scene is for Lady Anne to get married, as part of the historical

  1. Examine how Ackroyd presents ideas of originality in the novel 'Chatterton'.

    Meredith voices our thoughts as he says "this face is familiar...is it a poet, I wonder?" I find it hard to believe that this is a coincidence. Ackroyd has deliberately placed this here to make a connection between time zones.

  2. How do the poets in 'Charlotte O'Neils song' and 'Nothing Changed' show their feelings ...

    She is saying that it isn't the natural way of the world at all. By leaving England she can start a new life abroad where she will be able to have a better standard of living. The poet has explained some of the background to this poem.

  1. The changing position of women and the suffrage question. Revision notes

    went on hunger strike, this became the protest weapon of choice for imprisoned suffragettes. * At first, hunger strikers were released from prison. Then the Government, terrified of a hunger striking suffragette dying in prison and anxious not to create a martyr for the cause introduced forcible feeding.

  2. Wives & War: To what extent did these two aspects undermine Henry VIIIs rule ...

    Porter (2010, pg 200) argues that Henry favoured and took pleasure in Katherine adapting to the ideal role of being queen by relishing in an expensive wardrobe (exactly as he treated Katherine Howard-?a trophy wife?), Henry had no intention of a woman particularly his wife seeing him in a weak state as being confined to his bedchamber.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work