• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Do you agree with the view that in 1515-25 Henry VIII wholly surrendered power in government to Cardinal Wolsey?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Do you agree with the view that in 1515-25 Henry VIII wholly surrendered power in government to Cardinal Wolsey? From 1515 -1525 was the beginning of Wolsey's power to the height of influence. On one hand Henry did completely surrendered his power in government to Wolsey. For example when Wolsey was organising the expedition to France in 1513, although he had held none of the major offices of state he had been able to mobilise the whole machinery of government to carry out his commands. This had been possible not because Wolsey was some sort of power hungry nobody but because the king had given Wolsey the power in the organisation of the expedition to France. 'It must have seemed that a self indulgent king had wholly surrendered the care of state into the Cardinal's hands'1. ...read more.

Middle

Although Henry's like of Wolsey was seemed too much; Henry would bring financial ruin to any family when one of its members was reported to have said something unflattering about Wolsey in hearing of the King, the like from Henry gave Wolsey heads above his station. However, it seems that Henry did wholly surrendered power in the government to Wolsey because Wolsey wanted it; by 1515 Wolsey had the Lord Chancellorship from Archbishop Warham within two years of the invasion of France. However, on the other hand there is contradiction in the statement because the Wolsey couldn't have had definitive power because Wolsey is not King. 'Wolsey held a dominant position in the government and controlled the distribution of patronage. However, he lacked the daily contact that the king shared with the minions, his friends and associates among the nobility. ...read more.

Conclusion

In conclusion I don't agree with the statement because Henry couldn't of given exclusively power Wolsey but certainly gave as much as Wolsey would take to make him powerful and wealthier than the King. Even in 1520 Wolsey was doing the King's bidding 'writing is somewhat tedious to me... not to allow anyone else to bear this message. I desire you to keep a careful watch... any other others of whom you are suspicious'3 when the King didn't want to do himself. He was the end of something rather than the beginning; as someone who and little long term effect on anything, and therefore as being of little significance even if he did managed to have some sort of power in the short term. 1 Source 4 - (From J.J. Scarisbrick, Henry VIII, published 1968) 2 Source 5 - (From John Lotherington, The Tudor Years, published 1994) 3 Source 6 - (From a letter written by Henry VIII to Cardinal Wolsey in 1520) ?? ?? ?? ?? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Here's what a teacher thought of this essay

3 star(s)

*** This is a very real example of what might be produced under pressure of timed conditions. Essays must be planned before starting to write. There needs to be an argument that is set out at the start of the essay and there must be accurate and relevant detail from the period to support the key points. This essay has some but not enough supporting detail and the argument is too black and white.

Marked by teacher Kate Forbes 01/03/2012

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    The most important reason for Wolseys fall from power was his failure to obtain ...

    5 star(s)

    As Wolsey was unable to grant a divorce, he was not only depriving the King of a new wife whom he held feelings for, but also of a possible male heir which was one of the King's main priorities during his reign.

  2. Why did King Charles I Resort to Personal Rule in 1629?

    After the death of Buckingham, there were some improvements in Crown-Parliament relations. Some previously anti-Buckingham MPs felt they could now rejoin the King again, for example Thomas Wentworth. Also, Anglo-French relations improved as Charles moved closer to Henrietta Maria. However, there were increasingly disputes on such issues as Religion (Charles had promoted William Laud to Bishop of Chichester)

  1. How effective was Henry VII’s government?

    Ways Henry achieved this was by changing some of the methods of collection. Under the guidance of Sir Reginald Bray, his estates were managed more profitably from the early 1490's and the annual income from the crown lands increased from �29,000 in 1485 to �42,000 in 1509.

  2. Intertextuality in John Fowles' The French Lieutenant's Woman.

    The word "prisoner" suggests that Ernestina's actions are limited by her cultural inheritance. Sarah, on the other hand, represents the more liberated woman. She becomes "adept at handling [Mrs. Poulteney] as a skilled cardinal, a weak pope" (50). She seems bent on destroying the male fantasy of provider and

  1. How successfully did James deal with religious problems throughout his reign?

    In 1618, James' foreign policy interfered with the religious struggle in England. In order to create safety and allegiance for the future, James tried to marry Charles off to the Spanish Infanta. In pursuing this goal his policy towards Catholics at home softened.

  2. To What Extent Was Henry Vll Secure?

    During Henrys reign there were two great pretenders, the first was Lambert Simnel, he was an imposter to the English throne, he met Richard Symonds who trained him to impersonate Richard, Duke of York, younger son of Edward IV, but the plan was changed and Simnel was taken to Ireland,

  1. Why did Henry break with Rome?

    allowing Parliament to withhold annates from Rome but gave Henry the option of allowing them to continue. It also prevented the Pope from delaying the consecration of bishops, conveniently permitting Thomas Cramner to become Archbishop of Canterbury.

  2. Religion was the most serious problem facing Elizabeth in 1558? How far do you ...

    Finance was also a major issue for Elizabeth. Money was important; it gave a country security and presented the idea of wealth and power - a good image. Without this Elizabeth and England would be weak. Elizabeth had inherited around £300,000 in debt from Mary, a huge sum of money.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work