• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Do you agree with the view that in 1515-25 Henry VIII wholly surrendered power in government to Cardinal Wolsey?

Extracts from this document...


Do you agree with the view that in 1515-25 Henry VIII wholly surrendered power in government to Cardinal Wolsey? From 1515 -1525 was the beginning of Wolsey's power to the height of influence. On one hand Henry did completely surrendered his power in government to Wolsey. For example when Wolsey was organising the expedition to France in 1513, although he had held none of the major offices of state he had been able to mobilise the whole machinery of government to carry out his commands. This had been possible not because Wolsey was some sort of power hungry nobody but because the king had given Wolsey the power in the organisation of the expedition to France. 'It must have seemed that a self indulgent king had wholly surrendered the care of state into the Cardinal's hands'1. ...read more.


Although Henry's like of Wolsey was seemed too much; Henry would bring financial ruin to any family when one of its members was reported to have said something unflattering about Wolsey in hearing of the King, the like from Henry gave Wolsey heads above his station. However, it seems that Henry did wholly surrendered power in the government to Wolsey because Wolsey wanted it; by 1515 Wolsey had the Lord Chancellorship from Archbishop Warham within two years of the invasion of France. However, on the other hand there is contradiction in the statement because the Wolsey couldn't have had definitive power because Wolsey is not King. 'Wolsey held a dominant position in the government and controlled the distribution of patronage. However, he lacked the daily contact that the king shared with the minions, his friends and associates among the nobility. ...read more.


In conclusion I don't agree with the statement because Henry couldn't of given exclusively power Wolsey but certainly gave as much as Wolsey would take to make him powerful and wealthier than the King. Even in 1520 Wolsey was doing the King's bidding 'writing is somewhat tedious to me... not to allow anyone else to bear this message. I desire you to keep a careful watch... any other others of whom you are suspicious'3 when the King didn't want to do himself. He was the end of something rather than the beginning; as someone who and little long term effect on anything, and therefore as being of little significance even if he did managed to have some sort of power in the short term. 1 Source 4 - (From J.J. Scarisbrick, Henry VIII, published 1968) 2 Source 5 - (From John Lotherington, The Tudor Years, published 1994) 3 Source 6 - (From a letter written by Henry VIII to Cardinal Wolsey in 1520) ?? ?? ?? ?? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Here's what a teacher thought of this essay

3 star(s)

*** This is a very real example of what might be produced under pressure of timed conditions. Essays must be planned before starting to write. There needs to be an argument that is set out at the start of the essay and there must be accurate and relevant detail from the period to support the key points. This essay has some but not enough supporting detail and the argument is too black and white.

Marked by teacher Kate Forbes 01/03/2012

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    The most important reason for Wolseys fall from power was his failure to obtain ...

    5 star(s)

    As Wolsey was unable to grant a divorce, he was not only depriving the King of a new wife whom he held feelings for, but also of a possible male heir which was one of the King's main priorities during his reign.

  2. Free essay

    To what extent did Henry VII reduce the power of the nobility

    4 star(s)

    As money was a significant part of power to the peerage, the implementation of these laws which restricted the nobility in terms of men at arms, finances and inheritance, severely lessened the power of the nobility, therefore being the second most significant factor in their reduction of power.

  1. Why was there a revolution in France in 1789

    This was in fact an illusion placed in front of the truth. There may have been 10 million livres, but there was also a 422 million livres debt, which was ever increasing due to 'Necker's policy' of boring money and let the economy revive its self.

  2. How effective was Henry VII’s government?

    Much of the money Henry gained came about because of the management of land. He made sure that all land that he could have either by claiming it or inheriting it, was his. Constant additions were made to the royal estate by the clever way his government used the acts of attainder.

  1. How successfully did James deal with religious problems throughout his reign?

    Puritans objected strongly, because they thought that the Sabbath day was a day of rest. Realising the upset, James withdrew the order that the Book of Sports should be read out from the pulpit. When Bancroft became Archbishop of Canterbury in 1604 he was determined to enforce some discipline in the church.

  2. Henry VIII foreign policy

    This was a problem as he had to get permission to marry her as she was her brother's widow. No pope should ever overturn any decision of another since they are god's voice on earth so what they say god says and if 1 pope says another is wrong that means god was wrong.

  1. Rebellions can be seen as the greatest challenge facing Henry VIIs rule 1485-1509 Explain ...

    Henry became suspicious of the French revival after Charles VIII invaded Italy in 1495. During Henry VII?s reign many parts of France were virtually independent of the French King (Charles VIII), this included Brittany and Calais (which was ruled by England).

  2. What was the impact of the Poor Law Amendment Act on the relief of ...

    be easily found and the second was to protect urban ratepayers from the demands of migrant workers before obtaining regular employment. The less eligibility principle drove potential paupers to find work rather than entering the workhouse and settlement laws prevented people claiming relief other than in their own parish.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work