Page
  1. 1
    1
  2. 2
    2

Do you agree with the view that in 1515-25 Henry VIII wholly surrendered power in government to Cardinal Wolsey?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Do you agree with the view that in 1515-25 Henry VIII wholly surrendered power in government to Cardinal Wolsey? From 1515 -1525 was the beginning of Wolsey's power to the height of influence. On one hand Henry did completely surrendered his power in government to Wolsey. For example when Wolsey was organising the expedition to France in 1513, although he had held none of the major offices of state he had been able to mobilise the whole machinery of government to carry out his commands. This had been possible not because Wolsey was some sort of power hungry nobody but because the king had given Wolsey the power in the organisation of the expedition to France. 'It must have seemed that a self indulgent king had wholly surrendered the care of state into the Cardinal's hands'1. ...read more.

Middle

Although Henry's like of Wolsey was seemed too much; Henry would bring financial ruin to any family when one of its members was reported to have said something unflattering about Wolsey in hearing of the King, the like from Henry gave Wolsey heads above his station. However, it seems that Henry did wholly surrendered power in the government to Wolsey because Wolsey wanted it; by 1515 Wolsey had the Lord Chancellorship from Archbishop Warham within two years of the invasion of France. However, on the other hand there is contradiction in the statement because the Wolsey couldn't have had definitive power because Wolsey is not King. 'Wolsey held a dominant position in the government and controlled the distribution of patronage. However, he lacked the daily contact that the king shared with the minions, his friends and associates among the nobility. ...read more.

Conclusion

In conclusion I don't agree with the statement because Henry couldn't of given exclusively power Wolsey but certainly gave as much as Wolsey would take to make him powerful and wealthier than the King. Even in 1520 Wolsey was doing the King's bidding 'writing is somewhat tedious to me... not to allow anyone else to bear this message. I desire you to keep a careful watch... any other others of whom you are suspicious'3 when the King didn't want to do himself. He was the end of something rather than the beginning; as someone who and little long term effect on anything, and therefore as being of little significance even if he did managed to have some sort of power in the short term. 1 Source 4 - (From J.J. Scarisbrick, Henry VIII, published 1968) 2 Source 5 - (From John Lotherington, The Tudor Years, published 1994) 3 Source 6 - (From a letter written by Henry VIII to Cardinal Wolsey in 1520) ?? ?? ?? ?? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Here's what a teacher thought of this essay

3 star(s)

*** This is a very real example of what might be produced under pressure of timed conditions. Essays must be planned before starting to write. There needs to be an argument that is set out at the start of the essay and there must be accurate and relevant detail from the period to support the key points. This essay has some but not enough supporting detail and the argument is too black and white.

Marked by teacher Kate Forbes 01/03/2012

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics essays

  1. How far do you agree with the view that cultural imperialism was the main ...

    This is further proved by the expansion of British settlements in Sierra Leone and the Gold Coast, despite the fact that in 1865, the parliamentary select committee had forbidden them to expand any further in West Africa, highlighting the determination driven by potential economic gain.

  2. England was a Protestant country by 1553. To what extent do you agree ...

    Therefore, people may have been accepting the religious changes based purely on the benefits they were getting economically or through protection, the fact that they were unsure or ignorant about what was happening, or just out of fear of the consequences - rather than feeling wholeheartedly Protestant.

  1. Marked by a teacher

    The most important reason for Wolseys fall from power was his failure to obtain ...

    5 star(s)

    In this period of time (Wolsey's later years) the King became intrigued by Anne Boleyn and started to distrust Wolsey. This was because the King wanted to divorce the current queen at the time - Catherine of Aragon - and marry Anne Boleyn. The King's divorce was dealt with by Wolsey, yet because he could not grant this he was almost immediately removed from power.

  2. To what extent was Mary, Queen of Scots the major cause of instability in ...

    increased their numbers and Puritanism offered the mainly illiterate people a simple, direct form of worship with the promise of salvation. Moreover, puritans received support from Lutheran and Calvinist Churches in Europe, which could have led to a religious campaign against Elizabeth.

  1. Assess the view that the importance of Cromwells military role in the Civil War ...

    struggleâ as the Royalists held many advantages but Cromwellâs decision to rally his cavalry after victory and aid the other side of the battlefield was the decisive tactic that won the Parliamentarians the battle. Without the discipline that Cromwell used in his cavalry he would not have been able to rally his men the way he did.

  2. ' But everyman has his price.' Show the part that corruption plays in the ...

    "If the King takes that matter any further, with me or the Church, it will be very bad, if I even appear to have been in the pay of the Church" Other characters also appear to corrupt, often in their attempts to please the King.

  1. Why did Pitt dominate politics 1783-93?

    His reputation dramatically improved due to this as Pitt had tackled this problem quickly and efficiently and it had been going on for a long time, it had caught also out his predecessors and rivals, Fox and North.

  2. How successfully did James deal with religious problems throughout his reign?

    Once again the king and his parliament had treated the Catholic harshly, although aggravated by the assassination plot, it was simply another method to make their opinions heard, as previous attempts had been stopped. If James had tolerated the Catholics instead of taxing and forcing laws upon them and ignoring

  • Over 180,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work

Marked by a teacher

This essay has been marked by one of our great teachers. You can read the full teachers notes when you download the essay.

Peer reviewed

This essay has been reviewed by one of our specialist student essay reviewing squad. Read the full review on the essay page.

Peer reviewed

This essay has been reviewed by one of our specialist student essay reviewing squad. Read the full review under the essay preview on this page.