• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
Page
  1. 1
    1
  2. 2
    2
  3. 3
    3
  4. 4
    4
  5. 5
    5
  6. 6
    6
  7. 7
    7
  8. 8
    8
  9. 9
    9
  10. 10
    10
  11. 11
    11

Europe and the Suez Crisis 1956 - To what extent was the military action undertaken by the British and French in the Suez Crisis 1956 really necessary?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

HISTORICAL INVESTIGATION Europe and the Suez Crisis 1956 To what extent was the military action undertaken by the British and French in the Suez Crisis 1956 really necessary? Erika Udd�n IB 2C Words: 1901 Table of Content A. Plan of investigation 3 B. Summary of evidence 4 C. Evaluation of sources 6 D. Analysis 7 E. Conclusion 9 F. List of sources 10 Appendix 11 A. Plan of investigation To what extent was the military action undertaken by the British and French in the Suez Crisis 1956 really necessary? This historical investigation seeks to evaluate and compare the factors influencing the relationships and discussions between France and Britain during the Suez Crisis and thereby provoked them to commit military force to the region. The mainbody will look at the differences and similarities in Britain's and France's intentions in the Middle East, the internal situation (mainly in Britain), Nasser�s actions, public opinion in Western Europe as well as American and UN policies on the crisis. In order to carry out his investigation a variety of sources will be consulted primary and secondary, from which relevant information will be selected. Carlton�s "Britain and the Suez Crisis" and Thomas "The Suez Affair" will be of particular use. The sources used reliability (date of publication, author etc) ...read more.

Middle

Although it is acknowledged in the preface that there are problems of bias, subjectivity and perspectives in studying the past, the value of reading history "outweigh the drawbacks"10. Carlton�s book is far more analytical than Thomas� and includes different historical interpretations of the Crisis, which is of usefulness when studying the crisis from a broader perspective. However, Carlton�s book might be quite biased as it is very much written from a British perspective. Although both Carlton�s and Thomas�s books are British, they present a different view of the Suez Crisis, probably due to the different date of publication of the sources first edition. Although Thomas rewrote some parts of the book in his latest edition, the most substantial parts of his book, are based on sources available when the condemnation of the military action after the crisis made the propaganda turn against the British and French. In Carlton case, he has made an extensive use of materials released in the 80s, which seem to be friendlier towards he British and the French. By taking both sources in account they tell us how the history of the Suez Crisis has been reshaped due to political controversy and propaganda. D. Analysis If the Suez problem possibly could have been solved in a more diplomatic way, British and French prestige during the Cold War would doubtlessly have been more favorably after the crisis. ...read more.

Conclusion

and Israel to the Suez War, Longman, New York, 1991 Cornwell, R.D, World History in the twentieth century, Longman, England, 1984 Lowe, Norman, Mastering Modern World History, Third Edition, Macmillian Master Series, Biddles Ltd, Britain, 1997 Gildea, Robert, France since 194, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1996. Appendix The Six Principles: 1. There should be free and open transit through the Canal without discrimination, overt or covert. 2. The sovereignty of Egypt should be respected. 3. The operation of the Canal should be insulated from the politics of any country. 4. The manner of fixing tolls and charges should be decided by agreements between Egypt and the users. 5. Unresolved disputes between the Suez Canal Company and Egypt should be settles by arbitration. 1 Hugh Thomas, The Suez Affair, page 39 2 Ibid., page 41 3 Norman Lowe, Mastering Modern World History, page 230 4 David Carlton, Britain and the Suez Crisis, page 50 5 Hugh Thomas, The Suez Affair, page 40 6 Peter L. Hahn, The United States, Great Britain, and Egypt, 1945-1956, page 211 7 David Carlton, Britain and the Suez Crisis, page 52 8 Keith Robbins, The Eclipse of a Great Power, page 195 9 Hugh Thomas, The Suez Affair, page 7 10 David Carlton, Britain and The Suez Crisis, General Editor's Preface 11 David Carlton, Britain and the Suez Crisis, page 109 12 Ibid., page 63 7 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    To what extent is the oil crisis of 1973 a turning point in postwar ...

    5 star(s)

    While it was argued previously that the 1973 oil crisis caused a slight shift in power away from the US, it must be noted that it still only signified the start of the breakdown of American hegemony, and that American dominance over the world economy did not break down completely right after the oil crisis.

  2. Why did tension increase in Europe between 1900 and 1914?

    The death of Stalin In March 1953 Joseph Stalin died and was eventually replaced by Nikita Khrushchev. * Khrushchev believed in COEXISTENCE. Rather than try to destroy the West, the Soviet Union should accept that it had a right to exist.

  1. What were the similarities and differences between the events in Hungary in 1956 and ...

    The Hungarians did not give in and after 2 weeks an estimate of 30,000 Hungarians were killed. In Czechoslovakia however the USSR tried to slow Dubcek down. Polish and East German troops performed public training exercises on the Czech border.

  2. The Arab-Israeli conflict 1956, 1967 and 1973.

    a 'Government of National Unity' in which all political parties had a place. General Moshe Dayan, the former Minister of Defence was appointed as leader and he declared that the best form of defence for the Israelis was to attack.

  1. To what extent can the Suez Canal crisis of 1956 been said to have ...

    If Britain could maintain and control the Suez Crisis then Britain's self image would not change, yet if they were unable to handle the situation and Nasser then they would be perceived by other country's as being incapable of controlling their empire and would not be seen as a world power.

  2. American History.

    This was acceptable to negotiators b/c Napoleon had been defeated, which meant impressment was no longer a concern. - So what did the war do? It reaffirmed American independence [taught the British a second lesson] and? further convinced the US to stay out of European politics.

  1. The Prelude to the 1975 War and the Cairo Agreement.

    figures and issued a statement calling for the freedom of guerrilla action. An attempt tp convene a meeting by Shiite cleric Musa al-Sadr in support of the guerrillas was not successful as the meeting was boycotted by leading Shiite figures.

  2. To what extent did the reasons for and the nature of American and Soviet ...

    Egypt became heavily dependant on The USSR during 1955-1975. The Suez Canal Crisis was the impetus of behind the Soviets removal of support of Israel. America?s reluctance to finance Nasser in his grand schemes for turning Egypt into the primary economic and political power of the Arab world made Nasser turn to the USSR for support.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work