• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. 9
  10. 10
  11. 11

Europe and the Suez Crisis 1956 - To what extent was the military action undertaken by the British and French in the Suez Crisis 1956 really necessary?

Extracts from this document...


HISTORICAL INVESTIGATION Europe and the Suez Crisis 1956 To what extent was the military action undertaken by the British and French in the Suez Crisis 1956 really necessary? Erika Udd�n IB 2C Words: 1901 Table of Content A. Plan of investigation 3 B. Summary of evidence 4 C. Evaluation of sources 6 D. Analysis 7 E. Conclusion 9 F. List of sources 10 Appendix 11 A. Plan of investigation To what extent was the military action undertaken by the British and French in the Suez Crisis 1956 really necessary? This historical investigation seeks to evaluate and compare the factors influencing the relationships and discussions between France and Britain during the Suez Crisis and thereby provoked them to commit military force to the region. The mainbody will look at the differences and similarities in Britain's and France's intentions in the Middle East, the internal situation (mainly in Britain), Nasser�s actions, public opinion in Western Europe as well as American and UN policies on the crisis. In order to carry out his investigation a variety of sources will be consulted primary and secondary, from which relevant information will be selected. Carlton�s "Britain and the Suez Crisis" and Thomas "The Suez Affair" will be of particular use. The sources used reliability (date of publication, author etc) ...read more.


Although it is acknowledged in the preface that there are problems of bias, subjectivity and perspectives in studying the past, the value of reading history "outweigh the drawbacks"10. Carlton�s book is far more analytical than Thomas� and includes different historical interpretations of the Crisis, which is of usefulness when studying the crisis from a broader perspective. However, Carlton�s book might be quite biased as it is very much written from a British perspective. Although both Carlton�s and Thomas�s books are British, they present a different view of the Suez Crisis, probably due to the different date of publication of the sources first edition. Although Thomas rewrote some parts of the book in his latest edition, the most substantial parts of his book, are based on sources available when the condemnation of the military action after the crisis made the propaganda turn against the British and French. In Carlton case, he has made an extensive use of materials released in the 80s, which seem to be friendlier towards he British and the French. By taking both sources in account they tell us how the history of the Suez Crisis has been reshaped due to political controversy and propaganda. D. Analysis If the Suez problem possibly could have been solved in a more diplomatic way, British and French prestige during the Cold War would doubtlessly have been more favorably after the crisis. ...read more.


and Israel to the Suez War, Longman, New York, 1991 Cornwell, R.D, World History in the twentieth century, Longman, England, 1984 Lowe, Norman, Mastering Modern World History, Third Edition, Macmillian Master Series, Biddles Ltd, Britain, 1997 Gildea, Robert, France since 194, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1996. Appendix The Six Principles: 1. There should be free and open transit through the Canal without discrimination, overt or covert. 2. The sovereignty of Egypt should be respected. 3. The operation of the Canal should be insulated from the politics of any country. 4. The manner of fixing tolls and charges should be decided by agreements between Egypt and the users. 5. Unresolved disputes between the Suez Canal Company and Egypt should be settles by arbitration. 1 Hugh Thomas, The Suez Affair, page 39 2 Ibid., page 41 3 Norman Lowe, Mastering Modern World History, page 230 4 David Carlton, Britain and the Suez Crisis, page 50 5 Hugh Thomas, The Suez Affair, page 40 6 Peter L. Hahn, The United States, Great Britain, and Egypt, 1945-1956, page 211 7 David Carlton, Britain and the Suez Crisis, page 52 8 Keith Robbins, The Eclipse of a Great Power, page 195 9 Hugh Thomas, The Suez Affair, page 7 10 David Carlton, Britain and The Suez Crisis, General Editor's Preface 11 David Carlton, Britain and the Suez Crisis, page 109 12 Ibid., page 63 7 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    To what extent is the oil crisis of 1973 a turning point in postwar ...

    5 star(s)

    progress in the global economy , and would not have been possible without the onset of the 1973 oil crisis that sparked its formation- thus justifying the latter as a crucial turning point in the world economy's development. Yet, despite the fore-mentioned positive impacts of the oil crisis, it is

  2. Why did tension increase in Europe between 1900 and 1914?

    * There were many disarmament talks, but all went nowhere. * In Britain the Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament was set up in 1958. This tried to persuade the British government to give up its weapons and in 1960 'Blue Streak', the British missile was cancelled.

  1. To what extent was the Suez Crisis a major turning point in Britain's relationship ...

    This provoked some Arab resentment, and for an Arab league to form to establish a stronger position for themselves.

  2. What were the similarities and differences between the events in Hungary in 1956 and ...

    The Hungarians did not give in and after 2 weeks an estimate of 30,000 Hungarians were killed. In Czechoslovakia however the USSR tried to slow Dubcek down. Polish and East German troops performed public training exercises on the Czech border.

  1. What influence did the Suez Crisis have on British decolonisation 1956-64?

    The US ending of Lend-Lease and the harsh loan negotiated by Keynes made Britain heavily reliant on USA for economic reasons, as well as the military and diplomatic reasons and therefore, to improve relations following the crisis, decolonisation could be seen as appeasement by granting "self-determination" as America was opposed to the idea of the Empire.

  2. The Arab-Israeli conflict 1956, 1967 and 1973.

    the USA, Israel was given strength and was able to fight the second war in 1967. There were eight Arab nations ready beforehand to fight against Israel and so Israel's chances of survival seemed remote. Since Arab nationalism had by now increased and the Arabs were more than ready to

  1. American History.

    total crap [the navy had a whopping 17 ships]. Nobody enlisted in the national army, only in some of the state militias. In? the West there was initially a good response, but after word spread that the War Dept. wasn't paying people on time and they were low on supplies, nobody wanted to join anymore.

  2. Was the West justified in ignoring the 1956 events in Hungary and Poland as ...

    and the Warsaw Pact. As the Cold War matured and as the Soviets tried to maintain their position in Eastern Europe, the USSR had to commit all its efforts to the maintenance of its systematic powers. The Soviet Union was committed to weakening and ultimately destroying the 'capitalist world', which

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work