• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Evaluate Baldrick's explanation of the origins of the First World War.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

"I heard that it started when a bloke called Archie Duke shot an ostrich because he was hungry." Evaluate Baldrick's explanation of the origins of the First World War. There are few historical debates that have aroused such controversy as that of the causes and origins of World War One. There is an abundance of sources, both reliable and not so, and the blame for the war has been thrown around and indeed at everybody involved. Unlike the Second World War, where Germany is generally accepted as being to blame, WW1 is steeped in disagreement even to this day. Unfortunately for the historian, the blame for the war simply depends on who you ask. Britain, Germany, France, Russia, even capitalism itself have strong arguments against them. A problem one faces when investigating the crisis is that each argument does have its strong points, and, if approached unwarily, each could be accepted as the main cause of the war. Perhaps it is not surprising, then, that Baldrick should become a little confused as to the state of affairs. ...read more.

Middle

Marxist historians state Imperial rivalry and capitalism as the underlying causes of war. I agree with the idea that Imperialism significantly contributed to the war. The fact that there was a fairly hefty rivalry between nations is clear from their aggressive actions overseas, with the major powers such as Britain and Germany scrabbling to obtain and retain significant areas around the globe. The Marxist theory, however, goes on to say that the acquisition of new territory led capitalists to look for new markets abroad, which in turn encouraged governments to obtain more and more land, adding to the tensions between states. They claim that this ultimately led to war. I disagree with this theory, one, because the hostilities in Africa and Asia never truly threatened international war, and two, because I think that business heads at the time were keen to encourage amiable relations between states, with trading between nations truly coming into is own at this time. Fritz Fischer, a prominent German historian, claimed that all of the nation's international diplomacy was ruled by domestic policy. ...read more.

Conclusion

There is an idea that if Britain had made its stance clear during the July crisis in 1914 (we must remember that the triple entente was only an informal agreement, rather than a binding alliance), then Germany would not have gone to war with France. I think that this is plausible, as Germany would certainly have been reluctant to fight such a close rival, but I retain the belief that war would have taken place, if not that month, perhaps not in 1914, but at some point in the near future. So how close was Baldrick to the truth? It could be argued that he is right in saying the war started when Franz Ferdinand was assassinated, but I think it would be wrong to say it started because of his death. The tangled web of alliances in Europe at the time ensured that if one country went down, they all went down. Because of this I believe that if Princip had not shot Ferdinand and his wife, there would have been another incident to act as a catalyst to war. Ben Taylor ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. Total War, Britain during the Second World War

    It was one example of many of Hitler interfering in matters that he knew little about. The RAF had also bombed Berlin for the first, which Goering, the head of the Luftwaffe, had said would never happen. The switch to bombing London was by way of reprisal.

  2. The 'cause' of the First World War.

    This becomes apparent when we look at the July crisis; each country involved had pressure from an ally who felt obliged to respond in whatever manner without limitation. This is apparent when the Germans offered reassurance even if it meant war with the 'blank cheque' to Austria, and the Russian

  1. The origins of the 6 day war -June 1967.

    BUILD-UP TO THE 6 DAY WAR Lay in clashes between Syria & Israel from autumn of 1966-spring of 1967. Russians told Egyptians in May 1967 that Israel was preparing to attack Syria. This was false. What was Russian objective? -May have been trying to bolster Syrian government.

  2. Disadvantages of Capitalism.

    All resources are privately owned and will only be used for obtaining the highest profit. Advantages of Capitalism There are many advantages to a Capitalist economic system which could make it very appealing to society. The system allows the powers of market forces to operate which in turn gives the consumer a wider range of goods and services.

  1. American Capitalism.

    Of course, some people survived relatively unscathed, but, as normal, those people were the rich. The whole concept of an American dream could have worked if the country had taken their time, realised that there was no rush, if companies had expanded slowly and if people hadn't been so interested in the stock market.

  2. Interpretations of The First World War.

    It looks a really hot, sunny day out there and the is not one thing out of place. This is a piece of propaganda (a real life event that has been turned around to be used for advertisement). There is no way that these people could stand over the wall

  1. The Prelude to the 1975 War and the Cairo Agreement.

    Syrian mediation had been on the mind of the Syrian leadership since November 1975. Damascus was using a 'carrot-and-stick' approach with the Maronite leadership. Syrian support for Palestinian, Leftist and Muslim forces was intended to keep the Maronite leadership under pressure to reach a settlement that favoured Syrian interests.

  2. Britain and the First World War

    The King and MP's never visited the front line and relied on others for the latest news. Haig could have lied and made the situation sound better and consequently got his attack. Haig had a disliking of Lloyd George, because he found him irritating, and consequently he had a disliking to his way of thought and tactics on the battlefield.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work