• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Evaluate Baldrick's explanation of the origins of the First World War.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

"I heard that it started when a bloke called Archie Duke shot an ostrich because he was hungry." Evaluate Baldrick's explanation of the origins of the First World War. There are few historical debates that have aroused such controversy as that of the causes and origins of World War One. There is an abundance of sources, both reliable and not so, and the blame for the war has been thrown around and indeed at everybody involved. Unlike the Second World War, where Germany is generally accepted as being to blame, WW1 is steeped in disagreement even to this day. Unfortunately for the historian, the blame for the war simply depends on who you ask. Britain, Germany, France, Russia, even capitalism itself have strong arguments against them. A problem one faces when investigating the crisis is that each argument does have its strong points, and, if approached unwarily, each could be accepted as the main cause of the war. Perhaps it is not surprising, then, that Baldrick should become a little confused as to the state of affairs. ...read more.

Middle

Marxist historians state Imperial rivalry and capitalism as the underlying causes of war. I agree with the idea that Imperialism significantly contributed to the war. The fact that there was a fairly hefty rivalry between nations is clear from their aggressive actions overseas, with the major powers such as Britain and Germany scrabbling to obtain and retain significant areas around the globe. The Marxist theory, however, goes on to say that the acquisition of new territory led capitalists to look for new markets abroad, which in turn encouraged governments to obtain more and more land, adding to the tensions between states. They claim that this ultimately led to war. I disagree with this theory, one, because the hostilities in Africa and Asia never truly threatened international war, and two, because I think that business heads at the time were keen to encourage amiable relations between states, with trading between nations truly coming into is own at this time. Fritz Fischer, a prominent German historian, claimed that all of the nation's international diplomacy was ruled by domestic policy. ...read more.

Conclusion

There is an idea that if Britain had made its stance clear during the July crisis in 1914 (we must remember that the triple entente was only an informal agreement, rather than a binding alliance), then Germany would not have gone to war with France. I think that this is plausible, as Germany would certainly have been reluctant to fight such a close rival, but I retain the belief that war would have taken place, if not that month, perhaps not in 1914, but at some point in the near future. So how close was Baldrick to the truth? It could be argued that he is right in saying the war started when Franz Ferdinand was assassinated, but I think it would be wrong to say it started because of his death. The tangled web of alliances in Europe at the time ensured that if one country went down, they all went down. Because of this I believe that if Princip had not shot Ferdinand and his wife, there would have been another incident to act as a catalyst to war. Ben Taylor ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. Disadvantages of Capitalism.

    Included in this system was Slave plantations. The goal of English colonial settlement was to secure raw goods and markets for English products. In England merchants invested in the colonial industries. Other people from Europe began to immigrate into the colonies with the hope of becoming small farmers.

  2. How Significant were the Normandy landings in Defeating Germany in World War Two?

    Good, because he is analysing other factors into the vents leading up to Normandy and other factors that helped the invasion succeed. Source G also gives more precise key names and dates throughout the text. This relevant because this shows the historian knows what he is writing about.

  1. The Origins of War.

    On the other hand blaming him as the whole cause would be as imprudent as saying that the Great War was only caused by the death of the Arch Duke Franz Ferdinand or by saying that the Spanish Civil War's origin was only by the influence of Italian fascism and German Nazism.

  2. Total War, Britain during the Second World War

    During the second week of September London was bombed every night and there was nothing that the RAF could do about it. On the first night of bombing the anti-aircraft defences around London fired 140,000 shells and did not hit a single German plane.

  1. The 'cause' of the First World War.

    in the establishment of the German Empire which had upset the balance of power and agitated the British; with them pledging to guarantee Belgium's neutrality in any resulting conflict. Without such support / pressure / rivalry, disputes could have been contained and war avoided, however the alliance obligations to one

  2. The Prelude to the 1975 War and the Cairo Agreement.

    On the eve of the war in 1975 the military balance in the country was largely in favour of the PLO. Of the eight PLO organisations, with a total strength of 22,900 troops, Fateh had the largest number of fighters (7,000) and was the best equipped, followed by Saiqa (4,500).

  1. Interpretations of The First World War.

    Source F is a cigarette advertisement from 1915. It shows a man looking over the top of a trench to see if there are any snipers looking out for them. It shows them having nice clean uniforms and they have a happy face.

  2. After the collapse of the Twin Towers of the World Trade Center, the world ...

    Likewise the fact that the distinction between a crime and war becomes very ambiguous is very true, especially in the sense that even the word "terrorism" is universally undefined as what some call a terrorist attack, others refer to as Jihad or war on aggressors, which also works in favor of the theory.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work