• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Explain how the failure to prepare for war in the period 1940-43 contributed to Italy's failure in the Second World War

Extracts from this document...


Transfer-Encoding: chunked ´╗┐EXPLAIN HOW THE FAILURE TO PREPARE FOR WAR IN THE PERIOD 1940-43 CONTRIBUTED TO ITALY'S FAILURE IN THE 2WW. (8) It is undeniable that Italy was in no way prepared for the reality of war in 1940. Mussolini decided to enter war with the full knowledge that the Italian Commission on War Production had warned that Italy could not sustain a single year of warfare until 1949. No co-ordinating ministry was established to organise a future war effort with the result that the three armed forces competed against each other and no attempt was made to standardise equipment. ...read more.


The Air force possessed only 1000 effective planes with which to 'blot out the sun? and these were also of inferior quality. Army was also outdated, lacking tanks and they had virtually no anti-aircraft guns. The Chief of army staff complained to Mussolini but he assured him that there was no need for concern as the army was mainly intended for show and not for action. Furthermore, Italy was not economically prepared. The impact of the Abyssinian War and the Spanish Civil War had massively increased Italian levels of debt and Mussolini had failed to achieve autarky with the country still dependent on foreign imports of oil and fertilisers. ...read more.


In addition to this, Mussolini insisted on ?assisting? Germany on the Eastern Front ? this was despite the fact that German military leaders would have preferred for these resources to be directed for use in the Balkans and North Africa. Mussolini?s ignorance of the strengths of the USA and the USSR also demonstrated a lack of preparation. It was clearly an error to commit Italy so lightly and with so little thought of the consequences against the world?s two military giants, the USA and the USSR. The former played a key role in the defeat of the Axis in North Africa, whilst the latter drained off troops that could have been used to prevent this. Overall, Mussolini?s failure to prepare Italy both militarily and economically for the war was a major contributing factor to Italy?s defeat. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. The economic consequences of the First World War on Italy were the most significant(TM). ...

    To make matters worse as far as the industrialists were concerned, the end of the war led to a wave of labour militancy. Wartime discipline in the factories, enforced by the military, was relaxed. Workers who had resented the longer hours, the fall in real wages caused by inflation and the ban on industrial action vented their frustration.

  2. Why did Germany lose the second world war?

    By 1941, the Germans were steadily bombing British factories and civilians. If they had continued to do this they would have inevitably finished Britain off, for it was not a country with great industrial strength.

  1. Vietnam war

    feared that the communists would win the election. * Guerrilla activity in the South escalated, while U.S. military advisors continued to support the Army of the Republic of Vietnam. The result was the Second Indochina War, more commonly known as the Vietnam War. * However, the Diem government refused to enter into negotiations to hold the stipulated election,

  2. Trotsky - Succession, Revolutionary Success, Civil War Hero, Death, Failure and End

    Yet Trotsky's methods were criticised even by those in the Bolshevik party. Although in the eyes of many Trotsky was the 'champion of militarisation'32, his use of ex-Tsarist officers 'against bitter opposition from party members'33 as military specialists in the campaign against the Whites saw a sharp decrease in his popularity in the party.

  1. Unification of Germany and the period up to the second world war

    was to Italy but not the rhineland to France and so she was pissed off, and therefore she declared war after a problem from Spain arose as the rule was overthrown and they wanted Prussian ruler to come but Prussia said no and France wanted Prussia to swear never to

  2. The origins of the first world war

    the German states and under the popular Prussian leader they became one nation, now the balance of power in Europe started to tilt, as now a new potentially huge economic and military power existed in Europe that already proved to have aggressive policies.

  1. The battle of Britain was an important turning point in the second world war ...

    and they used the excuse to invade Poland in the September of 1939. Germany was really strong compared to Poland as on the first day that the attack took place the Polish air force was virtually wiped out. This was bad as the Poles could not defend themselves in the skies and stop bombs being dropped.

  2. The causes of the second world war - Problems 1919-1924.

    In September 1931 units in the Japanese army seized parts of a Chinese province of Manchuria, without any orders from the government. The Japanese government did nothing to terminate it because the Japanese people supported the army's action. By February 1932 the Japanese had occupied the whole of Manchuria.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work