• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Germany was more responsible than Britain for the naval race before the First World War. Discuss.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

SBQ: "Germany was more responsible than Britain for the naval race before the first world war" To identify who was to blame for the naval race between Germany and Britain, we need to assess the sources and each individual's opinion. The Naval race was a competition for naval power, for many years Britain had always had the strongest and largest navy until recently they invented a new powerful battle ship called the Dreadnought and not long Germany began to build them. Which lead to the race of who had the most. Source B tells us the opinion of the British government that the increases in warship numbers were for the national security for Britain and no reason to justify starting a naval race. "Maintaining superiority at sea is essential to the security of the British Empire." The source also tells us that Germany states its reason for naval increase has nothing to do with Britain's actions. "The German government has repeatedly declared that their naval policy has not been influenced by British actions" Source B tells us so far that both parties are very defensive about their naval increments and have reasons to justify their decisions. We can also see that both parties don't want to take blame by their reasons and further on in the source a statistical factor of Britain's support that they did not provoke the call for a naval race but rather Germany did. ...read more.

Middle

However because this was written after the war the opinions of the Admiral of the German navy may not have been the same as it was. The intentions for constructing a rapid growth of the German navy could have been intended for war however in Source B the British government states that "The naval expansion of Germany has not been provoked by British naval increases". This was written in 1912 which supports source C statement of "we never wished to replace British world power". We can conclude from this that Germany certainly felt that it shouldn't been blamed on the naval race as they have not demonstrated aggression but only growth in numbers with only defensive intentions and instead Britain's intimidation of Germany's naval fleet caused more tension therefore disagreeing that they should be more to blamed. Source D was written by Kaiser William II, the source tells us that from conversations with Bismarck. The source tells us that William intended for the Germany's navy as a defense for the country's important assets in foreign colonies. Telling us also that the colonies relied on naval protection, which required a fleet constructed in time. "Bismarck intended to use the colonies only for trade or as objects to exchange land in treaties and not to make any other use for them in Germany. ...read more.

Conclusion

Tells us that after the war the truth about British intentions of, in source A "Anybody who knows Britain a little knows that Britain has no intention to threaten Germany with the British fleet or attack Germany at all." Was false and that they were wanting war like the Kaiser stated "I am not impressed by their shouts of war". We can conclude that in this source Germany felt like Britain was to blame as they were being unfair in regards to the unfair demands of ship numbers even though there were no plans or intentions stated or shown from Germany asking for war. To conclude we can see that overall that all sources agree that both parties had reason to be blamed from sources A,D,C as they all pointed out that Germany's navy was for the intentions of protections of their own colonies and businesses. Even Source B stated this as well and that these sources were written before, during and after the naval race and world war, to prove that their intentions were real. Source B's Statistical evidence didn't prove that Germany was a threat and was merely used as an excuse to build more ships. From all this we can see that to a certain extent of wanting peaceful competition was Germany responsible but mostly it was Britain's fault to a large extent for causing aggravation from unfair demands and restrictions. ?? ?? ?? ?? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Hitlers Germany

    . . Adolf Hitler enters a hall. He sniffs the air. For a minute he gropes, feels his way, senses the atmosphere. Suddenly he bursts forth. His words go like an arrow to their target, he touches each private wound on the raw, liberating the mass unconscious, expressing its innermost aspirations, telling it what it most wants to hear."

  2. How far was the First World War responsible for the downfall of the Romanovs ...

    In addition the formation of the progressive bloc (236 of the Duma deputies who were denied a voice in the national policy)) which persuaded the Tsar to make political concessions were horrified at his stubbornness, and as a result the Tsar had lost a support and gained an enemy at

  1. Vietnam war

    * The NVA and NLF regular forces engaged US troops in major conventional battles once or twice a year to maximise US casualties. * Giap's overall strategy was to prolong the war, to destabilise the Saigon Government and to reduce public support in the USA for the war.

  2. The origins of the first world war

    In order to capture the new German public's heart, the Kaiser must create the wants and needs of the people in order to secure power. Could the new idea of nationalism be point blame of the long-standing rivalries between nations?

  1. "The First World War was the result of a badly mismanaged Balkan Crisis in ...

    Every nation was shocked; even Russia was shocked at what had happened. Upon 5 July, Berchtold consulted the Kaiser and his Chancellor. Bethmann-Hollweg showed support by giving Austria-Hungary the "blank cheque," or unconditional support. It then took Austria three weeks to draft the ultimatum that would be presented to Serbia.

  2. The extent to which Germany was responsible for world war one

    This event was Germany's responsibility and the part it played in the worsening relations in addition to this if it hadn't of been for this telegram then it is quite possible that Flottenpolitik and the alliance system would not have had the effect they did or give off such a stigma of being threatening.

  1. The Battle Of Britain

    This left Germany with it's eastern border open to the Russians as they advanced towards them. The soviets had no mercy on the Germans and in the end got revenge for the awful things that the Germans had done to the Russian people.

  2. Unification of Germany and the period up to the second world war

    Character * Influencible and too impulsive, sensible to flattery and such II. Policies internal * Domestically he gave free hand to the chancellor and tariffs were lowered and income tax and further social welfare too, suddenly attacked socialists again and he didn't care for internal policies at all really but

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work