• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Germany was to blame for the outbreak of the First World War do you agree?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Germany was to blame for the outbreak of the First World War do you agree? I do not agree fully that the Germans were to blame for the outbreak of war. German intentions were not to start a war, however there are a few events where they unintentionally helped to escalate the situation. There is no doubt that they did help to escalate the situation between Serbia and Austro Hungary. In this essay I will be arguing that Germans did not cause the outbreak of the war. I will be doing this by discussing the blank cheque, the Schlieffen plan, the September programme, the actions of the Kaiser and the actions of Bethmann Hollweg. Many historians argue that because Germany pre-planed for war that when the chance of war arose they obviously provoked it. The evidence for this argument is the Schlieffen plan, it was a military strategy devised in 1882 as a means of coping with a two front war. Some people argue that the Schlieffen plan is the first traceable reason why the war started. However this is hardly true the Schlieffen plan was drawn up because of the increasing pressure Germany was under because of the triple Entente. ...read more.

Middle

The September programme was a document that set out Germany's war aims, including a list of territorial acquisitions. This is seen to be incriminating because it was written so soon after war broke out. However Bethmann Hollweg was under a lot of pressure from military who needed to know their objectives. It should also be considered that the German army had been mobilised for a few months so plans for the army had to be drawn up. Some people argue that because the September programme was released so quickly that these objectives must have been premeditated. This is not completely true, it was important for the germens to think quickly what they were going to have to achieve in the war after all they were fighting on two fronts. Some of the objective might have been premeditated but these were probably defensive ones thought up long ago. It is clear to see that Bethmann Hollweg was caught between the Kaiser and Moltke. Bethmann Hollweg's behaviour is often criticized during the July crisis. It is Bethmann Hollweg's actions that are used as the argument against him. However what he did can be seen as a gamble that went horribly wrong. ...read more.

Conclusion

The real nation that was to blame for the outbreak of war was Austro-Hungary who even after finding no evidence that linked the assassins to any terror groups in Serbia and after Serbia agreed to their ultimatum still invaded their country. This is really the behaviour of a nation with war on their agenda. Austro-Hungary it can be said had to avenge the death of Franz Ferdinand. Russia too could have avoided war but much like the Kaiser the Tsar kept on changing his mind. In conclusion from the evidence above it can be seen that everyone muddled into war and that no one power is to blame. The September programme and the Schlieffen plan which are seen to highlight German guilt, do not and are actually defensive precautions not premeditated plans for war. Bethmann Hollweg and the Kaiser both were trying to achieve the same objective but were both communicating very well. The nations involved in the July crisis can be blamed for standing by their alliances instead of sorting out the situation. Germany did contribute to the mix up between nations in the Balkans and for inciting Austro-Hungary however they are not ultimately to blame for the outbreak of war. William Woollett 6D1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. Explain how the Schlieffen Plan was meant to work?

    He did not command the individual forces, but he did receive all the relevant information and he came up with military plans that made the most effective, co-ordinated use of all the of resources of the Allies. At the same time as the Allies began to co-ordinate effectively, German forces began to run out of manpower, resources, ammunition and equipment.

  2. To what extent were germany to blame for the outbreak of ww1

    industry had overtaken Britain's and was second in the world only to the USA. It is evident that Germany was rapidly improving its empire and was therefore in a position for war. Leaders of Germany were very ambitious but also had concerns.

  1. Who is to be blamed for the outbreak of the First World War?

    First, politicians during the peace conference at Versailles in 1919, and later historians, felt obliged to asses who bears the greatest burden of guilt for outbreak of the World War I, by analyzing the individual guilt of each particular state.

  2. The Prelude to the 1975 War and the Cairo Agreement.

    To avoid armed conflict with the Lebanese Front who exerted enormous pressure on him to order his fighters to retreat, he moved his fighters to the mountains of Aqoura from where he conducted miltary operations against the Syrian forces. In the following months, the Syrian presence grew to 27,000 troops.

  1. Interpretations of The First World War.

    Source E is an extract from the News of the World in July 1916. It tells of the latest updates regarding the war. It says that, "The British have stormed the German trenches 16 miles North of the Somme. Sir Douglas Haig reports that a great battle is raging."

  2. How Significant were the Normandy landings in Defeating Germany in World War Two?

    The anniversary is a celebration of freedom and victory and 'commemoration' so for a British newspaper, the British public is not going to want to hear about D-Day's flaws. Secondly, this is secondary evidence. This means the writer wasn't there to actually see what happened- he/she is just going on the basis of what they have heard and researched.

  1. To What extent was Germany Responsible for the outbreak of World War One?

    It only reveals that they were prepared to take a huge risk on European safety to achieve their aims and due to their inadequate war plans (which relied upon Russia being ill prepared for war) needed to take that risk sooner rather than later.

  2. Britain and the First World War

    This advertisement presents us with a picture of a British soldier standing above a trench saying 'Time for one more'. This means there is always time for one more attack on enemy lines.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work