• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
Page
  1. 1
    1
  2. 2
    2
  3. 3
    3
  4. 4
    4
  5. 5
    5
  6. 6
    6
  7. 7
    7
  8. 8
    8
  9. 9
    9
  10. 10
    10
  11. 11
    11
  12. 12
    12
  13. 13
    13

How did Stalin, who was illustrated by Leon Trotsky himself as 'the most eminent mediocrity' [1] rise to develop into the epithet, 'the Red Tsar of all Russia?'

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

I. Table of Contents Section (I-VII) Page Number * I. Table of Contents.......................................................................................1 * II. Introduction.............................................................................................2 * III. Background information..............................................................................2 * IV. Luck * A. Nature of the infant Bolshevik state...................................................................4 * B. The Nature of Stalin........................................................................................4 * C. The Death of Yakov Sverdlov.........................................................................4 * D. 'Ban upon factionalism' policy...................................................................... 5 * E. The 'Lenin Enrolment'.................................................................................5 * F. Stalin versus Lenin, Lenin's Death (1924) & the failure of demoting Stalin ...................6 * G. The attitude towards Trotsky and his errors.........................................................8 * V. Skill * A. Introduction to Stalin's Skills........................................................................8 * B. Stalin as General Secretary of the Bolshevik Party................................................9 * C. Stalin as the Orator at Lenin's funeral in 1924 and active support of Leninism...............9 * D. Stalin takes advantage of the attitude towards Trotsky: 'Permanent Revolution' versus 'Socialism in One Country'.........................................................................10 * E. Stalin's economic and political pragmatism.......................................................10 * VI. Conclusion........................................................................................... 11 * VII. Bibliography....................................................................................... 13 II. Introduction There is no doubt that Josef Stalin represents the ultimate figure of paradox in the world of communism, as this 'man of steel' was early on concurred as the 'safe gray blur' yet later acknowledged as the 'Red Tsar' of all Russia. How did this pedestrian man, who was illustrated by Leon Trotsky himself as 'the most eminent mediocrity' 1 rise to develop into the epithet, 'the Red Tsar of all Russia?' The multifaceted and ironic process of his ascension to supremacy defines Stalin as an exceptional phenomenon. His rise to the top is remarkable on the grounds that Stalin was neither a philosopher nor a cogent orator, but managed to administer his way to the top. Many maintain that his rise was a combination of political genius and sheer luck. But when we examine the factors of luck, it can be clearly seen that it was due to this dynamic that Stalin was able to rise to the top. Without the factor of luck as an underlying basis to his accomplishment in succeeding Lenin, Stalin would not have been able to use his abilities and skills to rise to the top in any case. ...read more.

Middle

Exacerbating his head-to-head clash with Lenin, Lenin dictated a letter to Stalin warning that he would break off relations if he did not apologize to his wife, Nadezhda Krupskaya, whom he had personally insulted, calling her a "syphilitic whore" for allowing Lenin to write a letter to Trotsky four days after the Central Committee placed Stalin in charge of Lenin's health. 18 Stalin's actions could lead us to a perception that Stalin did want power badly and that he did have tendencies of rebellion despite being referred to a pedestrian. However, again luck seemed to favor Stalin. If Lenin had not been ill and died in 1924, Stalin could have been relieved of his post, absolutely ruling out any possibility to his rising up to power. The failure of reading out Lenin's Testament a year before Lenin's death in 1923 as he had requested and its neutralization after his death in 1924 definitely played a significant role in the failure of having Stalin removed from his post. Concerned of what might happen after his death, Lenin wrote a Testament in which he acknowledged the strengths and weaknesses of Central Committee members. Reflecting back on Stalin's policies towards national groups, most significantly Georgia, Lenin was clearly concerned over the power that was currently in Stalin's hands and how he had the potential to misuse his power, 19 Lenin's codicil unquestionably proved his concern over Stalin which reached it paramount point just previous to his death, by requesting that Stalin to be removed from his post and to be replaced by "appointing another man in his stead who in all other respects differs from comrade Stalin...more tolerant, loyal, polite and more considerate to the comrades, less capricious etc..." 20 This was a definite deterrent to achieving supremacy for Stalin. Yet Lenin was not able to convey publicly his final thoughts before his death due to his illness that restricted him from taking active part in Bolshevik politics. ...read more.

Conclusion

But when examining the relative importance of luck and skill, it can be concluded that luck was most significant as it provided Stalin with the grounds and basis for him to rise. Another may argue that Stalin's rise to supreme authority was purely on the basis of his skills, maintaining that without the skills Stalin exercised, he would not have been promoted to his posts through which he manipulated central organs of the Party that eventually crowned him with triumph. However, considering many crucial factors that were based purely on luck, such as those of the death of Lenin that saved Stalin from a certain demotion and Yakov Sverdlov's death in 1919 which placed Stalin in the chair of General Secretary, an essential position which we can refer to as the ultimate catalyst to Stalin's triumph, we may argue that without these essential luck factors, Stalin would not have had the chance to use his adroit aptitudes to manipulate his way to the top. Hence in reality Stalin did prove to be the consummate player in the game of politics, along the way verified himself to be the cleverer politician by outmaneuvering his rivals through the use of many unintentional readily available resources provided by the Party and by exploitation of his rivals' miscalculations which made him look positive and constructive while making his opponents look negative and destructive. Despite the findings, a new issue could be raised regarding Stalin's head on clash with Lenin that led to the request of Stalin to be removed of his post, why did the 'grey blur' clash with his leader? "Couldn't he have acted as the obedient cohort and wait for the wounded lion to die before challenging some of his views?" 32 Does this prove that Stalin had tendencies of rebellion, fighting to justify his beliefs despite considerable political risks? Nonetheless, Josef Stalin was a 'lucky inheritor,' ascribing luck as the basis of his rise. So many 'if only's' could have saved Russia from the so-called 'grey blur,' whom, with the aid of time, would be referred paradoxically as the 'Red Tsar' of Russia. VII. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Role of Women Under Stalin

    24 Perhaps Stalin only responded this way for fear of upsetting his military leaders and soldiers, the nucleus of support in his position of ruler in Russia. He unmistakably reveals that he views women as less than human, who did not merit compassionate treatment, and sadly, this is not the last time that this attitude is brought up.

  2. To what extent was Stalin responsible for the modernisation of Russia?

    Under Alexander II's rule, Russia was an expanding giant; however, it could not generate enough capital to support the rapid industrial development or to compete with advanced countries on a commercial basis. Therefore, it must be said that industrialisation was ready to go ahead at this time, however, the resources it needed were not available.

  1. To what extent was Hitlers rise to power due to Economic Problems?

    There is a theory that it was the hidden international power brokers who wanted him in power because they knew that he would start World War Two, and this would create enormous wealth for the international elite and the global war machine.

  2. Mussolini(TM)s rise to power up to 1922 owes more to the failures of others ...

    The system of Trasformismo meant that parties were not clearly defined; governments relied on consensus between the different political parties as no one had an overall majority. This coalition system encouraged politicians to use bribery and political favours, and did nothing to restore the public's faith in their democracy or to solve the social and economic problems.

  1. How did Joseph Stalin rise to power?

    Also luck played a part in the fact that there were many weaknesses in Stalin's political opponents. For instance, Trotsky was an arrogant man, strangely this helped Stalin. Of all the times Stalin manipulated Trotsky, like the incident at Lenin's funeral, not once did Trotsky speak out and state what Stalin had been doing.

  2. Stalins Russia, 1924-53 revision guide

    He wanted 'Permanent Revolution'. * 1925 Party Congress: Stalin had many supporters at the congress as a result of his position as General Secretary. Kamenev was the Chairman of the Moscow branch of the Party, and Zinoviev of the Leningrad branch. All votes went against Trotsky. He lost his position as Commissar for War.

  1. Did Stalin betray the Russian Revolution?

    Nationalism was not a Marxist feature. Nor was it particularly one of Lenin's; he ignored Trotsky's protests and ordered the signing of the 1917 treaty of Brest-Litovsk, sacrificing vast swathes of his own country to Germany. Stalin, however, made his stance clear in his 'Mother Russia' speech of 1931.

  2. History - Mussolini's Rise to Power

    The Fascist Party has primarily been presented as a 'catch-all party' maintained with hierarchical vigour, as stated above. Incidentally this contributed massively to their following. Blinkhorn again emphasises Mussolini's influence on his opponents, believing that 'Fascism obtained power not through revolution but as the result of Mussolini's compromise with conservative and ostensibly liberal interests' (3).

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work