• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How far did Pitts domination of politics from 1783-1792 rest upon his reforms?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

How far did Pitt’s domination of politics from 1783-1792 rest upon his reforms? Pitt’s reforms dramatically changed the way the country was run and greatly helped him to dominate politics and consolidate his position as Prime Minister from 1783-1792. When Pitt took over in 1783, Britain was in economic crisis. The American War of Independence (which lasted 8 years) caused the value of exports to decline and the National Debt had risen to £242 million by 1784. He needed to act fast and make drastic change to avoid complete financial ruin in Britain. To do this, Pitt made a variety of changes and reforms. His first one was stopping the smuggling trade, in order to halt the thousands of pounds being lost in revenue due to smuggling. He introduced the Communication Act, which was designed to lower the import duty on tea and therefore make smuggling less profitable. Also, a Hovering Act introduced meant that smugglers’ vessels could be searched up to 12 miles out to sea, which deterred and reduced the number of smugglers. The fact that Pitt also reduced duties on items such as brandy led to an increase in the value of food and raw material imports, which was good news for Pitt, as it allowed the government to gain more money. Pitt then decided to put extravagant taxes on the rich. ...read more.

Middle

Ideas from the French could spread to the British, and a revolution was the last thing Pitt needed. To prevent such a thing from happening, it was essential for him to introduce a variety of reforms to laws and acts. Between May 1794 and July 1795 and 1798 to 1801 the Habeas Corpus Amendment act was suspended, which meant that people could be arrested on suspicion of committing a crime! Although it was extreme, it made sure that people would be completely deterred from plotting or committing a crime, which helped decrease the likelihood of a revolution starting. The second acts that Pitt implemented where the Seditious Meetings Act and Treasonable Practices act. Best known as the ?two acts?, they banned meetings that had not been approved of by the local magistrate. They attempted to keep an eye on illegal gatherings and broadened the definition of treason to allow more arrests of known radicals. This stopped people from organising gatherings and so prevented the ideas of individuals to be spread onto other people. In 1797, a law was passed which increased the penalty for undermining authority to the military. This was implemented after a mutiny in the Navy, and the law was extremely effective as it ensured troops to stay loyal, or get a severe punishment. It was also essential, as Britain needed to be fully prepared to fight off any revolution, especially after shortages in the military following the war with America. ...read more.

Conclusion

Also, Earl Grey and Samuel Whitbread, who were two for Fox?s political allies, demanded parliamentary reform just at the time when events in France were becoming more extreme. Whig landowners, who were traditionally on the side of Fox, felt endangered by Fox?s extreme views in supporting the French Revolution, and feared for their lands and property. Not only did other fellow Whigs disagree with Fox?s ideologies, voters also became repelled by the views, and the Whigs lost a great deal of support and public sympathy, which led to their downfall and their eventual failure to seize power from Pitt. Pitt saw this an opportunity to ?win over? moderate Whigs who felt let down by Fox?s views, and as a result, many moderate Whigs, led by the Duke of Portland, joined Pitt?s Conservative administration in 1794. This was a large step in Pitt stabilising and securing his government, and this new-looking government was the foundation of what became the Conservative Party of the 19th and 20th centuries, which highlights the significance of moderate Whig?s breaking free from Fox and joining Pitt. In conclusion, although other various factors greatly helped him to secure his place in power during 1783-1792, it was his cunning government reforms that helped keep the country in order and helped restore the economy, which were the defining part in Pitt?s domination of British politics towards the end of the 18th Century. Thomas Smith 6F3 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics essays

  1. How and Why Did Pitt Stay in Power for so Long?

    These three reasons kept the opposition weak; factions arguing amongst themselves, connections to the previous government and the French revolution. A weak opposition guaranteed Pitt's longevity as long as it stayed weak. As said before, the King wanted Pitt to be Prime Minister and in late-18th century politics this guaranteed Pitt's longevity.

  2. Free essay

    Liberal reforms

    Prior to these reforms the unemployed had suffered greatly. Middle classes blamed poverty among the unemployed on their inability to find work on laziness and reluctance. Two acts were introduced to try and aid the unemployed from the poverty crisis. The first of these acts was the National Insurance act part II of 1911.

  1. The British reforms to change India failed because the British would sometimes use force ...

    Lord Chelmsford toured India listening to local views on the British Government and other political matters. But in 1915 the British put forward the Defence of India Act, which made it possible for an Indian to be arrested for no charge.

  2. East of Eden: An Interpretation

    Aron Trask - Aron was steadfast in his morality and was disgusted by the filth of society, very much like his mother. But unlike Cathy, Aron would not have surrounded himself with anyone or anything against his beliefs. Aron's brother, Cal could be described as Aron's opposite.

  1. Changes in Crime and Punishment.

    This is why the writer of source C blames the taxation law for making smuggling into a crime when it 'should never have been.' The very fact that the writer blames the government shows that they also saw smuggling as a victimless crime and felt hard done by the government and its tax policy.

  2. How far & to what extent was Louis responsible for the turn of events ...

    By the time Necker came to office (Turgot fell from favour after trying to reintroduce free trade in grain) France finances were in a perilous position. The Compte Rendu gave an appearance that France had a small annual surplus, yet by 1786, the annual deficit itself stood at more than 100 million livres.

  1. Why did Pitt dominate politics 1783-93?

    Pitt also built support outside parliament with the reputation as a reformer, and someone who put Britain before his and his party?s financial gain and power. The new Prime Minister was also known for his honesty and integrity, compared to his predecessors who had mainly just wanted to have power.

  2. How well did Pitt deal with the radical threat?

    Unrest in the unions could have caused an uprising, which may not have ended nicely for Pitt due to the volume of workers in Britain at the time. Also, the workers would have been almost all the people in Britain influenced by the events in France and wanting to revolutionize,

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work