• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How far did the problems of his reign stem from Edward VI's minority?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

How far did the problems of his reign stem from Edward VI's minority? It can be said that Edward VI's minority, like many other boy Kings caused most of the problem's in his reign simply because it was other men ruling the country to their preferences and not to the country's. However, Edward's minority was not entirely responsible for the problems of his reign, the financial situation, for instance, was inherited from Henry VIII. Edward's minority did bring problems to his reign. Although Edward was a minor, it can be said that he influenced his councillors with his views on religion as well as on politics. The minority, however, meant that the councillors appointed by Henry VIII would rule the country until Edward was of age. However, Somerset manipulated the court and was named Lord Protector. ...read more.

Middle

Northumberland had underestimated the amount of support for Mary in the country. This event would perhaps not have occurred if Edward had not been a minor at the time; a smooth succession would have probably taken place. Both Lord Protectors had different aims. Whereas Somerset was more concerned with foreign policy, Northumberland tried to secure the financial situation. They seldom took the King's views into account, thus his minority allowed the Lord Protector's to do as they pleased in which case the problems did result as a result of Edward's minority. Throughout the ages we see that boy Kings have been failures mainly because of their minority. An example of this is Edward V and his younger brother who were deposed by their uncle Richard Duke of Gloucester. We see that a minor King was weaker, less powerful and easier to control, thus many problems could arise as a result of the King's minority to the extent of a deposition which occurred in 1483. ...read more.

Conclusion

Whoever ruled England from 1547 to 1553 faced great problems of inflation, poor harvests, and the 'sweating sickness' that killed many thousands in 1551. It is evident that the King's minority cannot be held responsible for such uncontrollable things as disease and harvests. Somerset fell from power in 1549, despite this Edward remained in power. This is significant; it shows that in spite of Somerset's failure to secure his position as Lord Protector as well as the foreign and financial policy, people were loyal to their King thus his minority did not always cause problems. An adult King would have prevented trouble developing amongst his councillors. There would have been no rivalries over power. Clear policies would have also been established, whereas the changes and compromises of Somerset and Northumberland could have only improved the government. However, Edward's minority caused struggles over power, policies to the convenience and view of each councillor, and changes to suit each Lord Protector at the time, his minority seldom provided England with anything positive. ?? ?? ?? ?? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Other Historical Periods section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Other Historical Periods essays

  1. To what extent was the Dutch Revolt in 1572 primarily caused by Religion?

    the Blood Council was an overreaction to the amount of Calvinist activity, causing masses of unneeded massacre. His forceful introduction of the Tenth Penny heightened the economic crisis, and his intimidation made the rebels too afraid to surrender. Therefore the combination of Philip and Alva not only caused unrest in

  2. Who was more important in bringing about the end of Apartheid and minority rule ...

    De Klerk steered the government through these talks against increasing unrest and violence. He possibly stirred up some of the violence to weaken the ANC and strengthen its rivals Incarta. He also tried to get Mandela to agree to a system of sharing power between racial groups to safeguard White

  1. Assess the Reign of Amenhotep III

    Additionally, the Pharoah's viziers were namely Ptahmose, Ramose, Amenhotep, and Aper-el- all of whom he conferred with for legal and administrative advice. The benefits of building were twofold. As historian Kemp mentions, "Ideology needs architecture for its fullest expression", just as building represented the pharaoh's, thus all of Egypt's, prosperity.

  2. To what extent did a strong succession mean a strong reign in the years ...

    Many of the rebels who participated in the uprising were blinded and murdered. This demonstrated his authority and control of his kingdom, which reinforced his reputation as a strong king, authoritative king, perhaps derived from his personality. William went onto show great adaptation and innovation within the governmental infrastructure of England.

  1. How successfully did the Labour governments of 1945-51 solve the social problems of the ...

    However, National insurance still became "the key agency, providing ultimate protection to more than eight million persons." (Nicholas Timmins) These acts were backed up by the 1948 National Assistance Act which was meant to be a safety net, providing extra help for those whose needs were not met by National insurance, and was therefore means tested.

  2. The storming of the BAstille was the most significant event in 1789

    The revolt in Paris, led to a percentage of the nobles emigrating abroad. Again this showed the failure of the king as it was led by the kings brother, Comte d'Artois who led 20,000 �migr�s out of Paris in 2 months.

  1. In the context of India in the 1840s to 1947, how far can independence ...

    his special powers of interference or set aside the advice of ministers in regard to their constitutional activities.?[27] This showed that Congress was willing to concede and move forward. When the Second World War began in 1939, Viceroy Linlithgow announced India was now at war with Germany.

  2. To What Extent Was Russia Modernised During the Personal Reign of Peter the Great? ...

    Peters window on the west became a symbol of civilised society and looked very western as Peter took great influences from all over the world, Marshall says that ?foreign influence was everywhere? when building St Petersburg.. The construction of St Petersburg took place from 1703, A St Petersburg is built

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work