• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How far did the problems of his reign stem from Edward VI's minority?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

How far did the problems of his reign stem from Edward VI's minority? It can be said that Edward VI's minority, like many other boy Kings caused most of the problem's in his reign simply because it was other men ruling the country to their preferences and not to the country's. However, Edward's minority was not entirely responsible for the problems of his reign, the financial situation, for instance, was inherited from Henry VIII. Edward's minority did bring problems to his reign. Although Edward was a minor, it can be said that he influenced his councillors with his views on religion as well as on politics. The minority, however, meant that the councillors appointed by Henry VIII would rule the country until Edward was of age. However, Somerset manipulated the court and was named Lord Protector. ...read more.

Middle

Northumberland had underestimated the amount of support for Mary in the country. This event would perhaps not have occurred if Edward had not been a minor at the time; a smooth succession would have probably taken place. Both Lord Protectors had different aims. Whereas Somerset was more concerned with foreign policy, Northumberland tried to secure the financial situation. They seldom took the King's views into account, thus his minority allowed the Lord Protector's to do as they pleased in which case the problems did result as a result of Edward's minority. Throughout the ages we see that boy Kings have been failures mainly because of their minority. An example of this is Edward V and his younger brother who were deposed by their uncle Richard Duke of Gloucester. We see that a minor King was weaker, less powerful and easier to control, thus many problems could arise as a result of the King's minority to the extent of a deposition which occurred in 1483. ...read more.

Conclusion

Whoever ruled England from 1547 to 1553 faced great problems of inflation, poor harvests, and the 'sweating sickness' that killed many thousands in 1551. It is evident that the King's minority cannot be held responsible for such uncontrollable things as disease and harvests. Somerset fell from power in 1549, despite this Edward remained in power. This is significant; it shows that in spite of Somerset's failure to secure his position as Lord Protector as well as the foreign and financial policy, people were loyal to their King thus his minority did not always cause problems. An adult King would have prevented trouble developing amongst his councillors. There would have been no rivalries over power. Clear policies would have also been established, whereas the changes and compromises of Somerset and Northumberland could have only improved the government. However, Edward's minority caused struggles over power, policies to the convenience and view of each councillor, and changes to suit each Lord Protector at the time, his minority seldom provided England with anything positive. ?? ?? ?? ?? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Other Historical Periods section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Other Historical Periods essays

  1. To what extent was the Dutch Revolt in 1572 primarily caused by Religion?

    the Netherlands but their ill-made decisions increased William of Orange's popularity and forced him into rebelling.

  2. The storming of the BAstille was the most significant event in 1789

    it condemned the Ancien regime and outlined the rights of citizens as outlined in the cahiers. The declaration was later attached to the constitution, and became an inspiration to Europe in the 19th century. Showing that the events started by the Bastille were significant not just in 1789, and in France but across time and other countries.

  1. Assess the Reign of Amenhotep III

    Additionally, the Pharoah's viziers were namely Ptahmose, Ramose, Amenhotep, and Aper-el- all of whom he conferred with for legal and administrative advice. The benefits of building were twofold. As historian Kemp mentions, "Ideology needs architecture for its fullest expression", just as building represented the pharaoh's, thus all of Egypt's, prosperity.

  2. Who was more important in bringing about the end of Apartheid and minority rule ...

    In the late 1980's international pressure and domestic unrest forced the government to strike a deal offering Mandela freedom only if he gave up politics and condemned militant ANC leaders. He refused to be released early unless ANC was allowed to be legal and the rest of the prisoners were freed.

  1. To what extent did a strong succession mean a strong reign in the years ...

    The meticulous control of his new kingdom can again demonstrate his authoritative, intolerant, supremely dominant personality that lead to a strong, efficient reign as king. In direct juxtaposition however, Stephen, who most certainly had the strongest succession of all the Norman kings, failed to effectively deal with such a threat to his kingship.

  2. In the context of India in the 1840s to 1947, how far can independence ...

    be made, followed by the ?transfer of responsibility from British to Indian hands.?[31] This was a crucial step towards independence, in which Gandhi played no part. American public opinion also turned against Gandhi and according to Brendon, foiled ?Nehru?s hope of hitching ?India?s wagon to America?s star and not Britain?s.?[32]

  1. By 1598, Spain was essentially bankrupt and Philip III inherited a nation seemingly doomed ...

    ports as well as building up his navy between 1560-1574 at a cost of 3.5 million ducats.

  2. To What Extent Was Russia Modernised During the Personal Reign of Peter the Great? ...

    in a strategically place of being close to the river Narva allowing Peter access to the Baltic sea which allowed him to establish new trade routes and encourage merchants to come and live in St Petersburg. As I stated previously Peter took many influences from across Europe in the design

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work