• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How far do you agree that the developmemt of the Cold War between the USA and the Soviet Union was primarly due to traditional great power rivalries?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

´╗┐How far do you agree that the developmemt of the Cold War between the USA and the Soviet Union was primarly due to traditional great power rivalries? Great power rivalry can be defined as two nations with ?overwhelming power? (McMahon) competing to exert their influence on the wider international scene. Following the Second World War, the traditional great power rivalry was between the USA and the Soviet Union. Ideological differences over conflicting political, economic and social systems introduced a particular potency to the conflict as ?each side? saw their countries acting for much broader purposes than the mere advancement of national interests?. Whilst other factors such as the role of personality and domestic pressures on the superpowers can be seen to have a role in the development of the Cold War. Nevertheless, overall the development of the Cold War between the USA and the Soviet Union in the years 1945-53 was primarily due to traditional great power rivalries. In seeking to exert their influence in the post-war power vacuum left by the defeat of Nazi Germany, the superpowers inevitably came into conflict with one another regardless of opposing ideology, and therefore traditional great power rivalries can be seen as the primary cause for the development of the Cold War. ...read more.

Middle

These events clearly show the respective superpowers manoeuvring for power in the unstable post-war climate, and therefore traditional great power rivalries can be seen as the primary factor in developing the Cold War. The role of ideology was to increase the potency of the great power rivalries between Communist Russia and Capitalist America. McMahon argues ?Ideology imparted? a strong faith in the world-historical roles of their respective nations?, the United States ?viewed the establishment of a freer and more open international economic system as indispensable to the post-war order? seen with the Marshall Plan in 1948; although, it may be argued the plan also had a purely economic element as Communism threated the US?s economic access to the lucrative European market. Whilst the USSR ?assumed conflict between the socialist and capitalist world to be inevitable? and set up Comminform in 1947 to coordinate Communist movements worldwide to entice a worldwide Communist revolution, whilst Commecon in 1948 in response to Marshall Aid. However, the primary aim of Stalin?s Russia was ensuring the security of the regime rather than spreading Communism worldwide. The Berlin Blockade of 1948-49 can be seen as ideologically motivated: Stalin attempted to prise the prosperous West Berlin, which due to the economical depravity of East Berlin was highly embarrassing for Communism, from the Western sphere of influence. ...read more.

Conclusion

In addition, internal pressure within the superpowers can be seen to have contributed to the Cold War. Following the end of the Second World War both nations? economies were dominated by the military industrial sector. These groups had a vested interest to see arms orders continue, and the Cold War provided the opportunity to exaggerate the threat posed by their respective ?enemy? to see these lucrative orders continue. Nevertheless, despite the effect internal pressure had on the development of the Cold War, the argument that traditional great power rivalry was the primary cause for the development of the Cold War remains more persuasive. In conclusion, the development of the Cold War between the USA and the Soviet Union was primarily due to traditional great power rivalries. Hobsbawn and McMahon provide evidence to support this argument, despite the latter emphasising the role of ideology. Own knowledge and Hobsbawn?s insights into Kennan?s long telegram demonstrate the role of ideology was to introduce a ?more dangerous? (Hobsbawn) aspect to the Cold War. Personalities also played a role in the development of the Cold War as Gaddis argues, whilst internal pressure placed political pressure on the Superpowers to develop the Cold War. Nevertheless, traditional great power rivalries were the primary cause for the development of the Cold War. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. How far was the USSR responsible for the outbreak of the Cold War?

    The reverse is applicable to Stalin's Bolshoi speech which was interpreted as a prediction of a Third World War. These constant suspicions of each other made fear dominate the thinking of both sides' as they both thought that the other was aiming to expand and compromise the other.

  2. The Cold War was a big rivalry that developed after World War II.

    Following the Soviet Union's destalinization campaign, the U.S.S.R. and Communist China began to move along different paths. In 1960, at the third Congress of the Romanian Communist Party, the U.S.S.R. and China quarreled bitterly and openly. The Soviet Union soon cut off technical aid to China.

  1. Free essay

    The Korean War represented total defeat for the Truman Doctrine? H. Brogan. How far ...

    Here the US weren't helping "free peoples" and were instead killing them. This is a definite failure for the Truman Doctrine, as there were people in the North who wanted to live under a democratic government, who wanted to be free and who were wrongly targeted as the enemy.

  2. The Origins of the Cold War.

    With increasing numbers and accuracy of delivery systems, particularly in the closing stages of the Cold War, the possibility of a first strike doctrine weakened the deterrence theory. A first strike would aim to degrade the enemy's nuclear forces to such an extent that the retalitatory response would involve "acceptable" losses.

  1. American economic foreign policy and the origins of the cold war

    Orthodox historians are quick in attributing the blame for the Cold War on the Red Army's imposition of communist governments in certain Eastern European capitals. In this light, the U.S. administration's ensuing repressive policies marked a purely defensive reaction to Soviet political authoritarianism in Eastern Europe.

  2. This graduation paper is about U.S. - Soviet relations in Cold War period. Our ...

    Throughout most of its history, Wall Street has opposed a bellicose position in foreign policy. Similarly, although historical differences are important, it makes no sense to regard them as determinative. After all, the war led to extraordinary examples of cooperation that bridged these differences; if they could be overcome once, then why not again?

  1. How far did peaceful coexistence ease Cold War tensions between the Soviet Union and ...

    But by 1954, Khrushchev saw that the Porkalla region was more of a financial drain than an asset, and so he gave it back to Finland, and the influence the Soviets had over the region was reduced significantly(although the Soviets still ensured that Finland would not pose a threat to the Soviet Union when necessary, especially by intervening in elections).

  2. How far do you agree with the view that the origins of the Cold ...

    When under the circumstances that would allow these two competing views to be executed, it was likely that conflict would ensue, as it did, in the form of a Cold War between the two powers. However, it is the inherent hostility that divided the USSR and the US, which was

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work