• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How far do you agree that the impact of the First World War was the main reason for the appointment of Mussolini in 1922?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

´╗┐How far do you agree that the impact of the First World War was the main reason for the appointment of Mussolini in 1922? By 1900 Italy's process of unification, the Risorgimento, had been largely completed territorially, but not in any other respect. As a result of Italy's more-than-apparent weaknesses (following the First World War) a cultural, industrial, military, and colonial power compared to older European states the inferiority complex about their nation so widespread among the educated classes was deepening, while the vast majority of the population still felt no real attachment to Italy at all. This situation gave rise to various projects for the total renewal of national life, both from the extreme right (the Italian Nationalist Association, the Futurists, D'Annunzio, the Florentine avant-garde) - enter Mussolini. When the war broke out in August 1914 the government remained neutral, and only took the decision to declare war on Germany and Austria-Hungary in May 1915 under intense pressure from `interventionism?, an alliance of all the anti-parliamentary forces just mentioned with a pro-war lobby in parliament. A prominent interventionist was Benito Mussolini. Though initially a Marxist, and until late in 1914 both a Socialist leader and a `neutralist', he had as early as 1909 made Italy rather than international capitalism the focal point of his revolutionary energies, and saw himself called upon to lead the process of social and political transformation - hence we can see it was in-fact the First World War which planted the roots for Mussolini?s successes, flourishing finally when appointed Prime Minister in 1922. ...read more.

Middle

The government had so far failed to restore law and order or public confidence, while the only effective barrier against a `Bolshevik' takeover was apparently being provided, not by the police or the army, but by the squadre d'azione. These black-shirted action squads were taking thelaw into their own hands in punitive expeditions against left-wing radicals or their headquarters. It was the rise of squadrismo which marked the establishment of a new force in Italian politics, Fascism - Mussolini had combined an opportunity arisen which had arisen from the war, and combined it with his own, showing to us that perhaps it wasn?t solely an element of the First World War which lead to the appointment of Mussolini. This initial sign of Mussolini?s personal actions leading to his success grew into a tactical game-plan from Mussolini. This is seen where Mussolini had formed the Fasci di combattimento in Milan in March 1919, but the national elections later that year had only demonstrated Fascism's irrelevance to the political life of the country, but despite this it did show Mussolini?s desire to make his way to political power. Fortuneately for Mussolini at this stage, with the rise of squadrismo during the biennio rosso the situation changed dramatically. Since each `action squad' was coordinated by a local Fascio and hence connected to the Fascist headquarters in Milan, the spread of squadrismo turned Fascism into a powerful outlet for populist counter-revolutionary and revolutionary passions, especially in areas where the left had its strongholds. ...read more.

Conclusion

Another factor in Mussolini=s rise was the and to re-enfor Finally it should not be forgotten that had Victor Emmanuel chosen to sign the emergency decree in October 1922 then Mussolini's gamble would not have paid off. In short, the First World War provided the necessary, but not the sufficient conditions, for Mussolini's rise to power. Even after the March on Rome, it was further miscalculations by parliamentarians and the tacit support of both the Church and the Monarchy which enabled him to take shrewd advantage of the Matteotti crisis of 1924 and so lay the foundations of an authoritarian (`totalitarian=) state. Only then had Mussolini=s `rise to power' progressed to the point where he could embark on the doomed Fascist experiment in the creation of a `new Italy'. Mussolinis rise to power was undoubtly his own tactical astuteness. He cleverly applied a blend of paramilitary violence and diplomacy, extraparliamentary and parliamentary tactics, or, as he once put it himself, `legalism and illegalism', to exploit to the full the opportunities created by the spread of squadrismo, radically changing policies and resisting several challenges to his leadership on the was - but clearly without the First World War, this would have most definitely not been a possibility as there simply wouldn?t have been the conditions present for a full Political takeover to take place - as it did so - ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. How far were White weaknesses responsible for Red success in Russian Civil War?

    had full popular support from the working class, they published a heroic poster whereby three representatives of the different categories of people within the working class are keen to come "to the defence of Petrograd". Moreover, propaganda was a key aspect of Trotsky's Red Army policy and he recognized the

  2. Assess in general terms the economic, social and political impact of the First World ...

    The impact of this mass movement was to inflict more misery on the governments of war torn Europe. Less investment meant less money in the economy and much less to rebuild with. Inflation rose as the French and in particular German governments printed more and more money.

  1. The impact of the First World War

    protect their empire and maintain the sea routes between the different colonies. The Kaiser William II of Germany hated and envied Britain for having a stronger navy than his. He increased the German navy and built many warships. Britain responded with building more ships and increasing its navy too.

  2. To what extent was the Civil War the main factor in the Bolshevik

    have weakened this argument as they were included like the war against the greens which leads me to the impression that this source is not very credible. And they would be cautious on what sort of signal they would have emitted to the rest of the world as the communist soviet government was still in power in during the time.

  1. How can we account for the rise of fascism in Italy after the First ...

    to the war, like Pirelli Tyres, Montecatini Chemicals and Fiat ( the largest vehicles manufacture in Europe by 1918). But after the there were several problems in the factories. Obviously the production had to be changed into peace industry, which took a long and cost again a big amount of money.

  2. Britain and the First World War

    For this reason the source is not reliable. Haig says in his concluding sentence 'Germany was within six months of the total exhaustion of her available manpower if the fighting continues at its present level on the Western Front'. Haig believed that Germany was exhausted.

  1. Armed forces.

    1711 Tuscarora war between settlers and Indians in North Carolina; Dismissal of Marlborough 1712 Last execution for witchcraft Handel arrives in London Thomas Newcomen invents steam powered piston engine 1713 Utrecht treaty gives Britain Newfoundland, St. Kitts and Hudson bay.

  2. In the context of the period 1905-2005, how far do you agree that Khrushchev ...

    Likewise, Stalin?s Collectivisation process had failed to produce an economic structure of continuity, with state farms operating at a loss, since procurement prices which were set by the state, had hardly been increased since 1928.[19] Stalin was indeed conscious of this, stating to the party that they had become ?dizzy

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work