• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How far is it accurate to describe Hitler as a 'weak dictator'?

Extracts from this document...


How far is it accurate to describe Hitler as a 'weak dictator'? The Third Reich, for Hitler, was supposed to have lasted 1000 years minimum, but it only lasted 12 years and four months. Many historians blame this on an individual that's Hitler himself. Whether it is accurate or not to describe Hitler as a 'weak dictator' has been questioned for decades, leading to the heart of the complex Intentionalist-Structuralist debate. The argument is based on Hitler being a weak dictator that was unable to unite Germany, as a new Fuhrer should had. On the one hand, there are the Intentionalist historians who argue forcefully that `Hitler was master in the Third Reich', while the Structuralists stress the many constraints on Hitler's power which range from his own personal inadequacies to the limits imposed upon him by the structure of the Nazi party and state. There are many themes both supporting and going against this debate, themes such as; the consolidation of power; decision-making and image and reality, all of which could be used to come to a conclusion on Hitler's dictatorship. It is certainly hard to make out a case for Hitler being a weak leader in the period 1925-33. ...read more.


When it came down to decision-making, Hitler's will was law! The Nazi structure put Hitler as a kind of absolute monarch, f�hrer, who was surrounded by officials, constantly competing with each other. As f�hrer he had the power to dominate and rouse an audience and masterminded the Nazi campaign for power by creating the Nazi ideology. Through doing so he established a dictatorship that had considerable popular support! Due to this f�hrer system it seemed to Nazi government that there was no need for a formal decision making structure and it could be apparent that from Hitler's political decision-making process that in effect laid the foundation for World War 2. It is clear that Hitler was central to the regime, as developments such as the SS developing, extermination of the Jews and involvement in the war, would not have happened without him. Intentionalists argue that Hitler was a strong dictator who controlled and planned everything. Whereas, it could also be seen that Hitler's power to make informed decisions was limited by the very system he had created and that he was a prisoner of his own structure. Although maybe providing an overall vision he was a man remote from public affairs who was uninvolved in actual decision-making. ...read more.


In reality also, Hitler was helped into power, through gaining an advantage from the collapse of international order and from being given the job in the first place, whereas his image had suggested otherwise. Hitler's tactics through propaganda in reality could also be seen as the weakness of a dictator as maybe he doubted his ability to gain support and power from the German people and therefore felt he had to fight off an beat opponents through methods such as the on station radios. In total conclusion, from the evidence I've provided Hitler seems to have been a weak dictator. He had definite powers and initiation, through his quick reaction to the international crisis and problem German fell into during the late 1920's and through his ability to gain such support and following from the majority of the German population despite lack of controlled organisation structure and decision making in his own party. He certainly achieved highly through the use of propaganda, yet in reality and behind closed doors he was failing fast, which is why the Third Reich ended when it did and why Hitler's dictatorship can be concluded as weak. Fiona Crookshank ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Was Hitler a Weak Dictator?

    The personal nature of his dictatorship was illustrated by the new oath of the army to Hitler personally. Therefore, to the outside world Hitler seemed to be the embodiment of a strong personal dictator. However, as historians have investigated the workings of the Nazi state many have come to revise their view of Hitler.

  2. Leni Riefenstahl The Propagandist or Artist? A Historiographical Debate.

    off the names of their hometowns, which range from every corner of Germany, are intended to highlight the Nazi belief in the superior Aryan race, and also the Nazi policy of Volksgemeinschaft. * Triumph of the Will- This film has been described as the most influential propaganda film of all time.

  1. "Mussolini was an all powerful dictator" - How accurate is this statement?

    However the main reason that there was no threat for Mussolini of the King attempting to dismiss him was the King's loyalty to him. This loyalty came from pressure from the elite to support Mussolini but also because Mussolini looked like the best political option for the king with no better alternative.

  2. Hitlers Germany

    The significance of the religious factor can best be seen in Bavaria: the northern part, which was heavily Protestant, tended to vote Nazi while Catholic southern Bavaria gave the Nazis their lowest vote in any section of Germany. This was, of course, where the party had started and where its leadership was still based.

  1. To what extent can Hitler be considered to be "weak"?

    Burleigh (2000), shows a insight that gives an idea that Hitler did not have to take hold of all his responsibilities as the Furher. "We should not expect a leader who saw himself as an artist-politician genius to behave like a hard working academic committee man"3.

  2. No Hitler: No Holocaust How far is this statement by the historian Michael Marrus ...

    The Nazi elite made up of individuals such as Hermann Goering, Reinhard Heydrich and Heinrich Himmler, although following orders and part of a system or process, in practicallity played huge roles in the Holocaust. The elite often originated the detail of anti-semetic policy, for example, Himmler's and Goering's role in

  1. Was Hitler a weak dictator?

    In some way the army controlled Hitler, they may had offered him revolution towards his regime if he didn't do so and as well Hitler needed a strong and loyal army by is side. Hitler had created several police forces that had major power and influence in Germany, these were the SS, the Gestapo (secret police)

  2. Hitler and the Nazi Regime - revision sheet.

    Treaty of Versailles and bring all of Germany, including its economy back to its place in the sun. This included funding a rearmament geared economy to build Germany's military might so that Germany would be prepared for invasion, or more appropriately...to invade. ??Type of Government:?Hitler eventually established a totalitarian dictatorship.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work