• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How far was Lord Liverpool's government a reforming one in the years 1822 to 1827?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Transfer-Encoding: chunked How far was Lord Liverpool?s government a reforming one in the years 1822 to 1827? The restructuring of Lord Liverpool?s cabinet in the early 20?s was thought of by many as a change in the direction of the government. Several Historians say that 1822 was a turning point in Lord Liverpool?s government which was, before this date, a government focusing only on repression. I agree with this point of view and will put across evidence and justification for this, throughout my essay. Firstly, as mentioned in my introduction, a restructuring of Lord Liverpool?s cabinet took place in 1822. As a result of this, Sir Robert Peel was introduced and was responsible for the reforming of the Penal Code between 1824-6. Because of this, a more humane system of punishment was introduced and the death penalty was abolished for the majority of crimes. This, together with the passing of the Jail?s Act in 1823, meant that the treatment of prisoner?s was a lot fairer. ...read more.

Middle

Nevertheless, another reason that provides evidence for Lord Liverpool?s government not reforming to a high extent in this time is the repealing of the Combination Laws, which suggested that the government was now less concerned with public unrest. However the repealing of the Combination Laws still accounts for reform, whether that reform is positive or negative in the eyes of the public is a different story. Another argument against mines is that there was no major reform of the Corn Laws. Many Historians argue that the introduction of the sliding scale meant that the Corn Laws still benefited the landed classes, and were not catered for the middle and working classes, and that The new strength of the economy meant that as amendment to the Corn Laws was economically viable, and also meant there was less unrest, meaning that trade unions would now be allowed. Thus Liverpool?s government 1822?27 could hardly be called a reforming one. Nevertheless, I disagree and argue that modification of the Corn Laws was reforming as prices at which foreign corn could be ...read more.

Conclusion

All in all, it is argued by many critics of Lord Liverpoo. that the reforms passed at the time were significant for that particular time and by modern standard, were not very reforming. Nevertheless I disagree with this and believe that what matters is the effect that the reforms had on the people that had to endure them. It is unfair to compare the severity of the reforms in a then-now style as the situation of living is a lot different nowadays. Furthermore, those who argue that very little reforms helped the working class are exaggerating as reforms were put into place to help to lower classes, albeit not as much. For example, the allowing of Trade Unions in 1825 was a very important step for the working class who now had support and a voice. It is for these reasons along with those listed throughout my essay that I argue that Lord Liverpool?s government was a reforming one between this time period, to a large extent as a lot was changed/achieved in a small amount of time that benefited the country as a whole. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics essays

  1. How and why did Lord Liverpool survive the Radical Challenges of 1812 ...

    There for they were easily defeated by the government. Cato Street was organised by a number of Spenceans who wanted to assassinate the cabinet as they meet at Grovesnor Square in February 1820, this would, they hoped, paralyse decision making in the capital creating chaos and confusion leading to uprisings.

  2. How successful was Lord Liverpools government in defeating the radical demands in the years ...

    eventual stability and relative prosperity of the latter stages of the period. Finally, the impact of the death of Lord Liverpool highlights just how important he was in his role as Prime Minister, as leader of the government in this period.

  1. Charlemagne Essay.

    Quentin in 806, the missi oversaw the mobilisation authorities who had to ensure that servers and helpers were notified and their equipment inspected. The process for this was slow, and there was often a major delay between the alert and arrival of the forces at the place of concentration.

  2. arctic story

    I do not really, want to be walking back to where we are now this afternoon. We do not have enough food and supplies to waste a whole day going round in circles. "Can we just start walking then, and don't you dare blame me if we are going in

  1. 'George Stephenson was the most important reason for the building of The Manchester to ...

    The parliament did not wish to put forward any money or commitments for the British manufacturers to help develop the country's international exports. There was at that time a lot of pressure from the factory owners and merchants for a new faultless method of transport.

  2. Nell Gwyn (Playhouse Cretaures) essay

    Gwyn and the other ten "women comedians in His Majesty's Theatre" were issued the right (and the cloth) to wear the King's livery at the start of this exile, proclaiming them official servants of the King.[16] After the theatres reopened, Gwyn and Hart returned to play role after role that

  1. "Tory Government in the Period 1822 to 1830 had a genuine desire to introduce ...

    It had previously been based on how much the person earnt. Also, due to aristocratic influence over the Government, there was little opposition to the repeal of the income tax as it was not a major issue to them. The corn laws held the prices of wheat at a certain

  2. The changing position of women and the suffrage question. Revision notes

    * After weeks of discussion the Speakers Conference submitted its report to Parliament, recommending that ?some measure of women suffrage should be conferred? on ?women who have attained a certain age?. (35 was suggested as a guideline) What had changed by 1916?

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work