• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How far was the First World War responsible for the downfall of the Romanovs 1917?

Extracts from this document...


How far was the First World War responsible for the downfall of the Romanovs 1917? Nicholas ruled Russia from 1894-917 and was to be its final tsar. Nicholas accepted the throne under the impression he would rule his whole life as its undisputed leader as it was believed that he had been chosen by god and therefore had divine right to the throne. Nicholas had been determined to rule as harshly as his father; however, he was very weak and did not posses qualities capable of guiding Russia through its time of turmoil. The World War One alone did not cause the Romanovs to fall, it did however play a major part in the collapse of the monarchy. Many historians believe that Russia was on the brink of collapse in 1914, and therefore the war didn't matter as the tsar would have fallen very soon in any case. However I agree with the view that the war simply accelerated the revolution, speeding up something that would have not occurred for a while, or possibly no at all, had the war not occurred. Before the war many problems faced the country, including issues stemming from their economic situation and he political problems. ...read more.


Economic troubles began in 1914 when the government suspended the ability to convert rubles into gold and gave the treasury permission to print paper money without any regard to the amount of gold that was in the vaults in order to repay loans and pay for the war. As a result, there was the huge issue of uncontrollable inflation. Inflation did not hurt the peasants too much as they controlled the food. They hoarded what grain that they produced, and were reasonably comfortable. In contrast, inflation was very much felt by those who lived in the cities, and it hurt. As more were being printed and as inflation rose the actual value of the wages dropped from 85.5 gold rubles 1913 to 38 gold rubles in 1917. Prices increased with inflation, and many people could not afford to buy what little food was available. Long bread lines formed in the cities. Large numbers of poor people waited in line for hours in the cold to purchase a little bit of bread. The output for the national market suffered with the emphasis on war goods. There was little a peasant could buy and the shortage of goods prompted the farmers store their food. ...read more.


The Duma had only begun to work in such a way as to take power away from the government, revolutionary groups were weak as they had been penetrated heavily by the police, and the Tsar could still rely on the army to put down any disturbances. The war, however, changed that. Though there was a brief period of relative calm, anti-Tsarist feelings began to arise again after situations on the home and real fronts, including losses and the lack of food and consumer goods, became increasingly prevalent. It was not only the workers, students, and revolutionaries: there was no group that wanted the Tsar to stay. The economic problems faced by Russia were certainly not around before the war, and they had huge effects. During the course of the war the Duma had begun to take power away from the government. Revolutionaries began to provoke the population even more, eventually bringing about the strikes and demonstrations of February and March 1917. In addition, the Tsar could no longer count on his army for support in suppressing the population, as moral dropped lower with each recurring defeat. They no longer wanted to fight and showed this by joining with others who did not want the government to remain in power. Therefore it can be concluded that the revolution was accelerated by the First World War. By Bethany Brandon Blatch ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Explain how the effects of the First World War caused the collapse of the ...

    4 star(s)

    the wartime government in the hands of the Tsarina, Alexandra, and Rasputin. This was a mistake, as the Russian population disliked both Alexandra and Rasputin. They didn't like the Tsarina because she was German and they thought she was a spy for the war.

  2. How far can the downfall of Napoleon be explained by the continuous opposition of ...

    battle forced Napoleon to march further and further into Russia in terrible weather conditions that reduced his force by 150,000 in the first two months. What followed was described by Tulard as "one of the greatest disasters in history" whilst Ellis describes it as "without doubt his greatest single miscalculation, one from which he never fully recovered".

  1. How far was the Russian Provisional Government responsible for its downfall?

    After the Tsarist system collapsed there was a huge rise in inflation, due to the rising prices there was a lot of upset for the poor.

  2. To what extent were the actions of Tsar Nicholas II during the First World ...

    and the Masurian Lakes in 1914, as well as the failure of the aforementioned Brusilov Offensive in 1916. By 1917 there had been 7 million casualties: 1.8m killed, 2.8m wounded and 2.4m taken prisoner. This happened because of myriad reasons - the soldiers had a poor supply of equipment -

  1. How far was the First World War the main cause of the fall of ...

    The Tsar is as much to blame for his downfall as the First World War is. He was absolutely unsuited to be the ruler of such a diverse country, primarily because of his secluded childhood, which meant that he never grew an appreciation for how people lived, and his ideas about important issues were very independent.

  2. "The first world war was the result of long-standing rivalries between the great powers". ...

    It spurred the formation of the alliance between Britain and France, which proved to be a vicious circle concerning the development of hostility, that is, Germany felt further threatened by this alliance. It can also be argued that Britain would not have entered the fray of war, were it not for the imperialistic rivalry with Germany.

  1. "The Wannsee Conference was entirely responsible for the Holocaust" How valid is this assessment ...

    Although my argument supports the intentionalist perspectives. It seems implausible that the Nazi's anticipated all aspects of Jew killing. However there was a plan, the Nazi's seized opportunity and manipulated their ideas. It was this ability of opportunism that allowed the Nazi's to create the single most aggressive act of mass genocide in the history of man.

  2. How far do you agree that WW1 was mainly responsible for the February Revolution ...

    From June to August 1916, after moving to the Eastern front, the Tsar launched his last major offensive which was met with initial success but ended in a mass retreat of Russian forces. The Tsar was then blamed for the failure of the offensive because he had vowed to take

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work