• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How far was the Provisional Government responsible for its own downfall

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

How far was the Provisional Government responsible for its own downfall? Although there are many reasons for the failure of the provisional government, such as the fact they had to share power with the soviets. Their decision to continue fighting in the First World War was the most important because of this they lost support from the people and more importantly, from the armed forces, who they relied on to defend them. Therefore you could say that to an extent the Provisional Government was responsible for its own downfall. The biggest problem facing the failure of the Provisional Government was the First World War, Russia had already lost territory in Poland and morale within the armed forces was low. The continuation of the First World War meant that the Provisional Government lost support of the people. There were many within the provisional government who believed that Russia had a duty to stay in the war. Additionally Russia owed large amounts of money in foreign loans, and the British and French banks were willing to continue loaning money as long as Russia continued fighting, therefore influencing the Provisional Government to continue with war. ...read more.

Middle

In February 1917 the Provisional Government shared political power with the soviets; this meant that major areas of policy had to be agreed by both. The Provisional Government remained a liberal body however the soviets were dominated by left wing groups. The fact that the Soviets had introduced 'Order number 1' meant all army officers had to be elected by their own troops, therefore unpopular or enthusiastic officers were dismissed, undermining the authority of the officers. This Order states that military orders of the Provisional Government would only be recognised if they were agreed by the Soviet. This tipped the balance of power away from the Provisional Government as the Soviet had effective control of the army, because of this the provisional government asked for help from the Bolsheviks. This made the Provisional Government seem weak and additionally made the Bolsheviks popular and they took control of the Soviets. A significant factor contributing to the downfall of the Provisional Government is their inability to tackle land reforms. ...read more.

Conclusion

Therefore you could also say it was due to Lenin that the Provisional Government collapsed. The Kornilov Affair brought about a fatal blow to the position of the Provisional Government; Kerensky panicked and feared that Kornilov was planning a military takeover, when in fact Kornilov was more concerned about a radical left-wing plot against the government. Kerensky ordered his arrest and armed groups of workers in the capital; many of the Bolsheviks were also released from prison. The fact that Kerensky had relied on the Bolsheviks made them look strong and set them up as defenders of Petrograd, the Provisional Government then lost most of its authority by October 1917. Therefore the Provisional Government can be seen as responsible for its own downfall. In Conclusion the failure of the Provisional Government was due to a wide variety of reasons, such as poor leadership, in particular by Kerensky, and sharing power with the Soviet. However I believe that the Provisional Government was responsible for their downfall as it was their decision to continue fighting in the First World War, which was the main reason for the failure of the Provisional Government. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Other Historical Periods section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Other Historical Periods essays

  1. The First English Civil War

    On 11 July he came down and invested Hopton's foot in Devizes itself. The Royalist cavalry, Hertford and Maurice with them, rode away towards Salisbury. But although the siege of Devizes was pressed with such vigour that an assault was fixed for the evening of 13 July, the Cornishmen, Hopton directing the defence from his bed, held out stubbornly.

  2. The structures of the Soviet State were created by Lenin and abused by Stalin. ...

    If a target number was not met, punishments would follow - it is therefore likely that many workers exaggerated their numbers of output for fear of being tortured and/or punished. The targets produced were clearly lower than what Stalin wanted, but were within what could actually be produced so the

  1. Why did bolsheviks win civil war

    The success of the Bolsheviks coordinated attacks on the White Armies was also down to the qualities of their leaders, in particular, Lenin and Trotsky. Lenin had led the Bolsheviks to victory in the October Revolution and throughout the Civil War provided the energy and drive needed to inspire success,

  2. To what extent is it true to say the Provisional Government faced an impossible ...

    and who were desperate for democracy, because to them it seemed that although the Provisional Government was barely hours old, it held already an air of being a product of the old regime. The fact that the Provisional Government was made up of the bourgeoisie and the upper classes also

  1. How far was the First World War the main cause of the fall of ...

    Another important reason for why the war damaged Tsarism was the fact that it caused inflation in Russia, which lead to extreme poverty and high food prices. In 1914, Russia's economy had been strong but between 1914-1917 government spending rose from 4 million to 30 millions roubles, causing severe inflation by 1916.

  2. To what extent could the Crusades be described as failure within the years 1095-1195?

    At 1137 Byzantine Emperor John II invaded Antioch and conquered it. Failure of Crusader states to help Antioch showed to what extent the states were disorganized and the lack of support they had between each other. By the end of 1143 Muslim commander Imad al-Din Zenghi attacked the county of Edessa and tore it from the Crusaders.

  1. In the context of India in the 1840s to 1947, how far can independence ...

    Inadequate attempts by the British to deal with Indian grievances by giving them partial ruling power in a limited capacity did not pacify them, and the Rowlatt Act passed in 1919, simply added to criticism with its ?emergency measures?[15] to control unrest and conspiracy.

  2. Isolated, backwards and weak how far do you agree with this assessment of Russia ...

    There was also salt production on the shores of the white sea at perm and again in the south east in the lower Volga. Tar, pitch, potash and wax were already regular exports. Grain was the main product of the Volga basin and of the lands south of Moscow towards the warm water ports of the black sea.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work