• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How far was the Provisional Government responsible for its own downfall

Extracts from this document...


How far was the Provisional Government responsible for its own downfall? Although there are many reasons for the failure of the provisional government, such as the fact they had to share power with the soviets. Their decision to continue fighting in the First World War was the most important because of this they lost support from the people and more importantly, from the armed forces, who they relied on to defend them. Therefore you could say that to an extent the Provisional Government was responsible for its own downfall. The biggest problem facing the failure of the Provisional Government was the First World War, Russia had already lost territory in Poland and morale within the armed forces was low. The continuation of the First World War meant that the Provisional Government lost support of the people. There were many within the provisional government who believed that Russia had a duty to stay in the war. Additionally Russia owed large amounts of money in foreign loans, and the British and French banks were willing to continue loaning money as long as Russia continued fighting, therefore influencing the Provisional Government to continue with war. ...read more.


In February 1917 the Provisional Government shared political power with the soviets; this meant that major areas of policy had to be agreed by both. The Provisional Government remained a liberal body however the soviets were dominated by left wing groups. The fact that the Soviets had introduced 'Order number 1' meant all army officers had to be elected by their own troops, therefore unpopular or enthusiastic officers were dismissed, undermining the authority of the officers. This Order states that military orders of the Provisional Government would only be recognised if they were agreed by the Soviet. This tipped the balance of power away from the Provisional Government as the Soviet had effective control of the army, because of this the provisional government asked for help from the Bolsheviks. This made the Provisional Government seem weak and additionally made the Bolsheviks popular and they took control of the Soviets. A significant factor contributing to the downfall of the Provisional Government is their inability to tackle land reforms. ...read more.


Therefore you could also say it was due to Lenin that the Provisional Government collapsed. The Kornilov Affair brought about a fatal blow to the position of the Provisional Government; Kerensky panicked and feared that Kornilov was planning a military takeover, when in fact Kornilov was more concerned about a radical left-wing plot against the government. Kerensky ordered his arrest and armed groups of workers in the capital; many of the Bolsheviks were also released from prison. The fact that Kerensky had relied on the Bolsheviks made them look strong and set them up as defenders of Petrograd, the Provisional Government then lost most of its authority by October 1917. Therefore the Provisional Government can be seen as responsible for its own downfall. In Conclusion the failure of the Provisional Government was due to a wide variety of reasons, such as poor leadership, in particular by Kerensky, and sharing power with the Soviet. However I believe that the Provisional Government was responsible for their downfall as it was their decision to continue fighting in the First World War, which was the main reason for the failure of the Provisional Government. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Other Historical Periods section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Other Historical Periods essays

  1. How effective were National Government of 1931-1939 in dealing with the problem of unemployment? 20 ...

    The report also recommended that the Government subsidy should be withdrawn and the miners' wages should be reduced. The month in which the report was issued also saw the mine-owners publishing new terms of employment. These new procedures included an extension of the seven-hour working day, district wage-agreements, and a reduction in the wages of all miners.

  2. How far was the Russo-Japanese war responsible for the 1905 revolution

    was to be entitled political power and a form of responsibility however any plan or formation of this was crushed by the Tsar. Witte's economic policy was an economic and political cause contributing to an atmosphere towards the 1905 revolution as Under Witte's industrialisation policy; urban workers and peasants squeezed very hard by high indirect taxes and low wages.

  1. How far was the conservative government responsible for the outbreak of the General Strike ...

    defending themselves than worrying about the demands of the miners causing them to go on strike. We could argue that the TUC was more into achieving moderate changes and wanted to negotiate with the government however the miners wanted actual change and decided to do it by themselves as the

  2. The First English Civil War

    It was on the rock of local feeling that the King's plan came to grief. Even after the arrival of the Queen and her convoy, Newcastle had to allow her to proceed with a small force, and to remain behind with the main body.

  1. Louis XIV's fondness of war resulted his downfall

    As an absolutist monarch, Louis wielded unlimited decisions made by him; however, it wasn't despotism nor arbitrary power, as kings would have still had to justify their actions to the nobles and clergy. From 1679 to 1688, many of Louis' actions combined to cause the Nine Years War.

  2. How far would agree that the strength of the British government was the main ...

    many radical voices whose demands were considerably further than what the Whigs were prepared to grant, and this, coupled with popular discontent arising from widespread social distress posed a potentially explosive situation. However, the government's response to this was to try to keep Ireland under control by any means necessary.

  1. How and why did the Bolsheviks gain power in 1917?

    Unfortunately, the Tsar was not at the Winter Palace, and the protestors arrived to a hostile reception. This day would become known as "Bloody Sunday" and the beginning of the end for the Royal Family of Russia. This event had now allowed both the Social Revolutionaries (practically anarchists)

  2. In the context of India in the 1840s to 1947, how far can independence ...

    In June 1945, Clement Attlee was elected Labour Prime Minister, and had long been in favour of independence. This change in government and their attitude towards India would be crucial; because the promise of independence had been made, it was just a matter of when it would happen.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work